MODELS OF NATIONAL INTEGRATION IN POST-WAR GERMANY, FRANCE, THE UK, THE US AND CANADA WITH GROWING IMMIGRATION INFLUX
https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2014-5-3(17)-109-127
Abstract
The article presents immigration models of Germany, France, Great Britain, the US and Canada. North-American states differ from the ‘classic-nationalist’ European states in that they have considered immigration an important factor in their development from the very beginning of their political existence. Although political culture in these countries (the US and Canada) was formed under certain influence, the idea of an ‘ethno-cultural core’ is foreign to them. One of the biggest problems of immigrant integration in Western countries is that immigrants insist on having cultural rights within the public sphere of the receiving country and expect to see them respected. The difference in political culture between immigrant countries of North America and ‘nation states’ of Europe determine the two ways cultural rights are institutionalized in those countries and consequently the exact type of integration problems the countries face.
References
1. Birch A. Nationalism and National Integration, London, Unwin Hyman Ltd, 1989. С. 49.
2. Уолцер М. О терпимости. М. : Дом интеллектуальной книги, 2000. С. 40–49 // Малахов В.С. Национализм как политическая идеология. С. 254. [Walzer M. On Toleration. Yale University Press, 1997].
3. Hollifield J. The Migration Crisis in Westrern Europe: the Search for a National Model // Migration Ethniziät Konflict / ed. by Klaus J. Bade, Osnabrück, 1996. С. 375.
4. Hoskin M. Integration or Non-integration of Foreign Workers: Four Theories // Political Psychology, vol. 5, #4, 1984. С. 661–685.
5. Hollifield J. The Migration Crisis in Westrern Europe: the Search for a National Model // Migration Ethniziät Konflict / ed. by Klaus J. Bade. Osnabrück, 1996. С. 387.
6. Малахов В.С. Вызов националь- ному государству. Мультикультурализм как политическая программа // Pro et contra. Т. 3. 1998, № 2. [Malahov V.S. Vyzov nacional’nomu gosudarstvu. Mul’tikul’turalizm kak politicheskaja programma // Pro et contra. T. 3. 1998, № 2.]
7. Joppke C. Multiculturalism and Immigration: A Comparison of the United States, Germany, and Great Britain // Theory and Society. Vol. 25, № 4, 1996. P. 449–500.
8. Малахов В.С. Указ. соч.
9. Joppke C. Multiculturalism and Immigration: A Comparison of the United States, Germany, and Great Britain // Theory and Society. Vol. 25, № 4, 1996. P. 449–500.
10. Карачурина Л. Иммиграционная политика Германии: успешный и неуспешный опыт // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2008. Июль. С. 55. [Karachurina L. Immigracionnaja politika Germanii: uspeshnyj i neuspeshnyj opyt // Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. 2008. Ijul’.]
11. Banton M. National Integration in France and Britain // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2001. Vol. 27, № 1. Р. 151–168.
12. Hollifield J. The Migration Crisis in Westrern Europe: the Search for a National Model // Migration Ethniziät Konflict / ed. by Klaus J. Bade. Osnabrück, 1996. Р. 367–367.
13. Heisler B. Sending Countries and the Politics of Emigration and Destination // International Migration Review. Vol. 19, № 3. Special Issue: Civil Rights and the Sociopolitical Participation of Migrants. 1985. Р. 469–484.
14. Hollifield J. The Migration Crisis in Westrern Europe: the Search for a National Model // Migration Ethniziät Konflict / ed. by Klaus J. Bade. Osnabrück, 1996. Р. 385.
15. Banton M. National Integration in France and Britain // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2001. Vol. 27, № 1. Р. 151–168.
16. Donley T. British Public Opinion, Color Issues, and Enoch Powell: A Longitudianl Analysis // British Journal of Political Science. Cambridge University Press. Vol. 4, № 3, July 1974. Р. 371–381.
17. Paul K. “British Subjects” and “British Stock”: Labour’s Postwar Imperialism // The Journal of British Studies. 1995. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 236.
18. Hansen R. and King D. Illiberalism and the New Politics of Asylum: Liberalism’s Dark Side // URL: www.chass.utoronto.ca/rhansen/ Articles-files/20001.pdf
19. Robinson V. The Migration of East African Asians to the United Kingdom // Cambridge Survey of World Migration / ed. by Robin Cohen. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
20. ILijphart A. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, Berkeley and Los Angeles. University of California Press, 1968 // in Brian Barry, Political Accommodation and Consociational Democracy // British Journal of Political Science. 1975. Vol. 5, № 4. Р. 477–505.
21. Dixon D. Thatcher’s People: The British Nationality Act 1981 // Journal of Law and Society. 1983. Vol. 10, № 2. Р. 161–180.
22. Hollifield J. The Migration Crisis in Westrern Europe: the Search for a National Model // Migration Ethniziät Konflict / ed. by Klaus J. Bade. Osnabrück, 1996. Р. 392.
23. Peach C. Does Britain Have Ghettos? // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series. 1996. Vol. 21, № 1. Р. 216–223.
24. Coleman D. and Rowthorn R. The Economic Effects of Immigration to the United Kingdom // Population and Development Review. 2004. Vol. 30, № 4. Р. 579–624.
25. Talal Asad. Multiculturalism and British Identity in the Wake of the Rushdie Affair // Politics and Society. 1990. Vol. 18, № 4. Р. 455–480.
26. Philip M.I. Immigration in the United States // URL: www.ies.berkeley.edu/pubs/ workingpapers/CIIP-2-PLM-United-States.pdf
27. Massey S.D. The New Immigration and Ethnicity in the United States // Population and Development Review. 1995. Vol. 21, № 3. Р. 631–652.
28. Hollifield J. The Migration Crisis in Western Europe: the Search for a National Model // Migration Ethniziät Konflict / ed. by Klaus J. Bade. Osnabrück, 1996. Р. 393.
29. Ibid. P. 395. 30 Lipset S. The Canadian Identity, International Journal of Canadian Studies. 2006. 33–34. Р. 87.
Review
For citations:
Zaika K. MODELS OF NATIONAL INTEGRATION IN POST-WAR GERMANY, FRANCE, THE UK, THE US AND CANADA WITH GROWING IMMIGRATION INFLUX. Comparative Politics Russia. 2014;5(3(17)):109-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2014-5-3(17)-109-127
Views:
1528
Email this article 
