Preview

Comparative Politics Russia

Advanced search

From Regionalism to Transregionalism: Some Theoretical Conseptualisation of a New Reality

https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-58-72

Abstract

Regionalism as an international phenomenon dates back to post-WWII decades. It is well studied both in theoretical and practical perspective. It is quite clear to most researchers what the “old” or “new” regionalism is, and what kind of logic stands behind it. However, the classic theory of regionalism does not explain contemporary processes of interregional and transregional integration, which we witness today. A common point of the three approaches (namely, regionalism, interregionalism and transregionalism) is that all of them are related to globalization. Each of these approaches constitutes a response to globalisation’s challenges, which varies from region to region. Nevertheless, their aims and scope differ greatly. Regionalism represents interstate and transnational co-operation within an international region. It is derived from the logic of institutionalized interactions that may take a range of forms—from regular consultations on the ministerial level to creation of supranational bodies and common policies. Interregional co-operation implies institutionalized agreements between states representing two or more regions, which can act either on their own (i.e. quasi-interregionalism, or hybrid interregionalism) or as a part of a regional organization / informal regional group of states. The logic of interregionalism dwells on the wish for widening the geographic scope of economic interaction by opening new regional markets. Transregional cooperation, on the contrary, is promoted primarily by political factors, such as the wish of some states, which share common values, to unite their efforts in order to play a greater role in global governance. It is argued that the study of regionalism, interregionalism and transregionalism can make an essential contribution to the development of the contemporary theory of international relations.

About the Author

Kseniia A. Efremova
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Political Science, Associate Professor, Department of Asian and African Studies


References

1. «Bol’shaia Vostochnaia Aziia»: mirovaia politika i regional’nye transformatsii (Greater East Asia: World Politics and Regional Transformations) / Ed. by Alexei D. Voskressenski. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 2010. Pp. 93-94.

2. Agnew, J. Regions on the Mind Does Not Equal Regions of the Mind // Progress in Human Geography, 1999, Vol. 23, No. 1, p. 93.

3. Agnew, J.A. Arguing with Regions // Regional Studies, 2013, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 6-17.

4. Baert, F.; Scaramagli, T.; Söderbaum, F. Introduction: Intersecting Interregionalism // Intersecting Interregionalism. Regions, Global Governance and the EU. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. Pp. 1-12.

5. Börzel, T.A. Theorizing Regionalism: Cooperation, Integration, and Governance // Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism / Ed. by T.A. Börzel, T. Risse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Pp. 1-29.

6. Bowles, P. ASEAN, AFTA and the «New Regionalism» // Pacifi c Affairs, 1997, Vol. 70, No. 2, p. 225.

7. Buzan, B.; Wæver, O. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 564 p.

8. Dent, C.M. From Inter-Regionalism to TransRegionalism? Future Challenges for ASEM // Asia Europe Journal, 2003, Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 224.

9. Doidge, M. Joined at the Hip: Regionalism and Interregionalism // Journal of European Integration, 2007, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 229-248.

10. Fawn, R. ‘Regions’ and Their Study: Wherefrom, What for and Whereto? // Review of International Studies, 2009, Vol. 35, Supplement S1, pp. 5-34.

11. Fjäder, C. Regionalism in Asia and Europe in a Theoretical Perspective: ‘Rationalist’ and ‘Ideational’ Approaches // Asia-Pacifi c Journal of EU Studies, 2012, Vol. 10, No. 1, Vol. 73-101.

12. Gardini, G.L.; Malamud, A. Debunking Interregionalism: Concepts, Types and Critique – With a Transatlantic Focus // Atlantic Future Working Paper, 2015, No. 38, pp. 1-23.

13. Global’noe upravlenie: vozmozhnosti i riski (Global governance: Opportunities and Challenges) / Ed. by V.G. Baranovski, N.I. Ivanova. Moscow: IMEMO RAN, 2015.

14. Hänggi, H. Interregionalism as a Multifaceted Phenomenon: In Search of a Typology // Interregionalism and International Relations: A Stepping Stone to Global Governance? / Ed. by H. Hänggi, J. Rüland, R. Roloff. N.Y.-L.: Routledge, 2005. Pp. 31-62.

15. Hettne, B. Beyond the ‘New’ Regionalism // New Political Economy, 2005, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 545-546.

16. Hurrell, A. Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective // Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organizations and Inernational Order / Ed. by L. Fawcett, A. Hurrell. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. Pp. 37-73.

17. Karimova, A.B. Regiony v sovremennom mire (Regions in the Contemporary World) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2006, No. 5, pp. 32-41.

18. Kireev, A.A. Poniatie «region» i predmetnometodologicheskie problemy regionovedeniia (The Concept of Region and Subject-Methodological Issues of Regional Studies) // Regionalistika, 2014, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 18-32.

19. Kuznetsov, D.A. Fenomen transregionalizma: problemy terminologii i kontseptualizatsii (The phenomenon of transregionalism: Problems of Terminology and Conceptualization) // Sravnitel’naia politika, 2016, No. 2, pp. 14-25.

20. Langenhove, L. Van. What Is a Region? Towards a Statehood Theory of Regions // Contemporary Politics, 2013, Vol. 19, No, pp. 474-490

21. Lewis, M. W. The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography / M. W. Lewis, K. E. Wigen. BerkeleyLos Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1997. Pp. 194-200.

22. Mezhevich, N.M. Opredelenie kategorii «region» v sovremennom nauchnom diskurse (Defi nition of the Region in the Contemporary Scholarly Discourse) // Pskovskii regionologicheskii zhurnal, 2006, No. 2, pp. 3-22.

23. Mirovoe kompleksnoe regionovedenie : uchebnik (World Regional Studies: A Textbook) / Ed. by Alexei D. Voskressenski. Moscow: Magistr; INFRA-M, 2014.

24. Paasi, A. The Region, Identity, and Power // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 2011, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 9-16.

25. Prokhorenko, I.L. Novyi regionalizm i transformatsiia mezhdunarodnogo poriadka (The New Regionalism and Transformation of the World Order) // Puti k miru i bezopasnosti, 2015, No. 2, pp. 20-28.

26. Toynbee, A. Dzh. Postizhenie istorii. Sbornik (Study of History) / Transl. by. E.D. Zharkov. Moscow: Rol’f, 2001. 640 p.

27. Voskresenskii, A.D. Kontseptsii regionalizatsii, regional’nykh podsistem, regional’nykh kompleksov i regional’nykh transformatsii v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniiakh (Concerts of Regiona–lization, Regional Subsystems, and Regional Transformations in the Contemporary IR) // Sravnitel’naia politika, 2012, No. 2, pp. 30-58.\


Review

For citations:


Efremova K.A. From Regionalism to Transregionalism: Some Theoretical Conseptualisation of a New Reality. Comparative Politics Russia. 2017;8(2):58-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-58-72

Views: 1892


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2221-3279 (Print)
ISSN 2412-4990 (Online)