COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS POLICY OF GERMANY, BRITAIN AND FRANCE IN CENTRAL ASIA
https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2011-2-4(6)-50-64
Abstract
Abstract: Germany, Great Britain and France stated their interests in Central Asia immediately after the disintegration of USSR. In 1994 and 1995 the policies of the leading European countries towards Central Asia stressed the restraining of Russia’s neo-imperial ambitions in the post-soviet space and the support of economic independence of Central Asian states. As of late 1990s the regional policies prioritized fighting the drug threat and after September 11, 2001 — the terrorism threat. The article reveals specific interests and country priorities of the leading European states in Central Asia and the differences in the general approach to the region and in the actual policies including the amounts of resources spent. The author argues that Germany occupies the most solid place in Central Asia due to a set of political, economic, military and humanitarian interests, though in general the regional policies of Germany, Great Britain and France lack any particular interests and standpoints, that could hinder the formation of the joint EU policy in the region.
Keywords
References
1. Le Monde. 1994. 29 avril.
2. Eurostat. Electronic database EU27 Trade Since 1995 By CN8. URL: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/newxtweb/
3. Германско-Казахстанский экономический ежегодник 2010/2011. С. 12. URL: http://download.owc.de/epaper-owc/2010-09-dkwjbkaz/
4. URL: http://www.nationalbank.kz/?docid=680
5. Dublin Group. Italian Regional Chair for Central Asia. Regional report on Central Asia. 12 July 2006. P. 1. URL: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st11/st11541.en06.pdf
6. Национальный состав населения СССР. По данным Всесоюзной переписи населения 1989 г. М., 1991. С. 13–17.
7. Перепись населения Республики Казахстан 2009 г. Краткие итоги. Статистический сборник / под ред. А.А. Смаилова. Астана : Агентство Республики Казахстан по статистике, 2010. С. 10. URL: http://www.stat.kz/p_perepis/Documents/Перепись%20рус.pdf
8. OECD. Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Development. Aggregate Aid Statistics. ODA by Recipient. URL: http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?
9. Национальный статистический комитет Кыргызской Республики. Национальный состав населения (по данным переписей населения). URL: http://www.stat.kg/stat.files/tematika/демограф/Кыргызстан%20в%20цифрах/демо7.pdf
10. Schmitz A. Efficiency and Its Costs: The “Strategy for a New Partnership” with Central Asia // The Potential of the Council Presidency. An Analysis of Germany’s Chairmanship of the EU, 2007 / Ed. by D. Kietz and V. Perthes. Berlin, January 2008. P. 72. http://www.swp-berlin.org/en/common/get_document.php?asset_id=4656
11. Федеральный канцлер Ангела Меркель совершила визит в Казахстан. 19.07.2010. URL: http://www.botschaft-kaz.de/ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=229:2010-07-22-10-36-31&catid=1:home&Itemid=1
12. House of Commons Hansard Commons Debates (Daily Hansard). Written Answers. February 2, 2010. Overseas Trade: Kazakhstan. URL: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100202/text/100202w0030.htm
13. Доктринальные выступления нового министра иностранных дел У. Хейга на сайте Форин-офис. URL: http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-us/what-we-do/our-priorities/
14. La France et le Turkménistan. Présentation. URL: http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/payszones-geo_833/turkmenistan_467/franceturkmenistan_1248/presentation_5474/presentation_14981.html
Review
For citations:
Yun S.M. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS POLICY OF GERMANY, BRITAIN AND FRANCE IN CENTRAL ASIA. Comparative Politics Russia. 2011;2(4(6)):50-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2011-2-4(6)-50-64