DECENTRALIZATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND PECULIARITIES CENTER LOCAL RELATIONS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2011-2-4(6)-35-44
Abstract
Abstract: The relationship between central and local government are the result of a long evolution of political, state and social systems. In each country they have their own specific logic and development. Decentralization is one of the main components of administrative reform in many countries, was aimed at improving governance, including through the development and more fully realization of the local government’s potential. Leading European countries have developed various theoretical and practical approaches that have become a reference for other countries.
References
1. Decentralization and local democracy in the world: first global report by United Cities and Local Governments, 2008. Barcelona: United Cities and Local Governments. 2009.
2. Bealey F., Chapman R.A., Sheehan M. Elements in political science. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999. P. 265.
3. Decentralization and local democracy in the world: first global report by United Cities and Local Governments, 2008. Op. cit. P. 314.
4. Bellamy C. Administering central-local relations, 1871–1919: the local government board in its fiscal and cultural context. Manchester: Manchester University Press ND, 1988. P. 2.
5. Stoker G. Comparative local governance // Th e Oxford handbook of political institutions. R.A.W. Rhodes, S.A. Binder, B.A. Rockman (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. P. 498.
6. Loughlin M. Legality and locality: the role of law in central-local government relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. P. 80.
7. Rhodes R.A.W. Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: the sub-central governments of Britain. Taylor & Francis, 1988.
8. Saunders P. Social Theory and the Urban Question. L.: Routledge, 2004.
9. Грин Д.Дж. Возращение в гражданское общество: социальное обеспечение без участия государства / пер. с англ. М. : Новое издательство, 2009.
10. Chandler J.A. Local government today. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001. P. 1–2.
11. Bogumil J., Holtkamp L. Kommunalpolitik und Kommunalverwaltung: eine policyorientierte Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2006. S.14–15.
12. Holtkamp L. Kommunale Konkordanzund Konkurrenzdemokratie: Parteien und Bürgermeister in der repräsentativen Demokratie. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2007.
13. Püttner G. (Hg.). Handbuch der kommunalen Wissenschaft und Praxis. Band 3: Kommunale Aufgaben und Aufgabenerfullung. NY-Berlin: Springer, 1983. S. 59.
14. Германия. Вызовы XXI в. / под ред. В.Б. Белова. М. : Весь мир, 2009. С. 104–105.
15. Thoening J.-C. Modernizing Sub-National Government in France: Institutional Creativity and Systemic Stability // V. Hoffmann-Martinot, H. Wollmann (eds). State and local government reforms in France and Germany: divergence and convergence. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2006. P. 38–58.
16. Gidlund J., Jerneck M. (eds). Local and regional governance in Europe: evidence from Nordic regions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2000. P. 11.
17. Chandler J. (ed.). Local government in liberal democracies: an introductory survey. NY, L.: Routledge, 1993. P. 122.
18. Mabileau A. Local politics and participation in Britain and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. P. 17.
19. Chandler J.A. Local government today. Op. cit. P .197.
20. Mabileau A. Local politics and participation in Britain and France. Op. cit. P. 18.
21. Stoker G. Comparative local governance. Op. cit. P. 498.
22. Garcea J. (ed.). Local government reform: a comparative analysis of advanced AngloAmerican countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. P. 1.
Review
For citations:
Trofimova I.N. DECENTRALIZATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND PECULIARITIES CENTER LOCAL RELATIONS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES. Comparative Politics Russia. 2011;2(4(6)):35-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2011-2-4(6)-35-44
Views:
1247
Email this article 