Preview

Comparative Politics Russia

Advanced search

The Eve of Global Conflict or Contra Spem Spero?

https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-3-15-8

Abstract

The article contains the description of the world political context that influences the evolution of the military-political sphere. The articles of the presented issue are devoted to this analysis. As a methodological framework, it is proposed to use the information introduced into scientific circulation by J. Rosenau in 1990, the concept of turbulence in world politics, which was developed in later literature. For an adequate interpretation of current trends in military policy, it is proposed to take into account the differences between modern conflicts and wars from their previous forms. In particular, it is appropriate to take into account the differences between total and limited wars established in the literature earlier. Another conceptual characteristic of modern wars is the theory of "world war" formulated in the doctrinal documents of the United States, in which military conflicts and their borders become indistinct, while the opposing sides include both military units and irregular formations. It is noted that for Russia, the security problem is historically a key problem, which is determined by the geopolitical location of an extended land state. The influence of this geopolitical circumstance was reflected in the configuration of Russian statehood with its traditional emphasis on a rigid hierarchy of governance, a strictly vertical decision-making algorithm and the centralization of the territorial structure, as a result of which hierarchization was not just an attribute of the historical evolution of Russia, but an archetypal form of organization of the country’s political space. In the modern world, the matrix of social organization is changing: a network appears next to the hierarchy, which problematizes the lack of alternative hierarchical decision-making algorithm and actualizes the updating of security concepts. 

About the Author

O. V. Gaman-Golutvina
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Dr. Oksana V. GAMAN-GOLUTVINA – Corresponding Member, Russian Academy of Sciences; Head, Department of Comparative Politics; President, Russian Association of Political Science; Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University); Editor-in-Chief, “Comparative Politics Russia” Journal; Member, Public Chamber of the Russian Federation and the Public Council under the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russia, 119454



References

1. Allison G. (2017) Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. P. xv-xvi.

2. Beck U. (2000) Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modern [Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. 383 p. (In Russian).

3. Beck U. (2007) Vlast i ee opponenty v epokhu globalizma. Novaya vsemirno-politicheskaya ekonomiya [Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy]. Moscow: ProgressTraditsiya: 464 p. (In Russian).

4. Derrida J. (2007) Pozitsii [Positions]. Moscow. 160 p. (In Russian).

5. Fenenko A.V. (2015) Sovremennye konflikty – otrazhenie voyn XVII–XVIII vekov [Modern Conflicts as a Reflection of Wars of XVII-XVIII Centuries]. Rossiyskiy sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam [Russian International Affairs Council]. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/sovremennye-konfliktyotrazhenie-voyn-xvii-xviii-vekov/ (accessed 21 November 2024). (In Russian).

6. Foucault M. (1999) Nadzirat i nakazyvat. Rozhdenie tyur’my [Modern conflicts as a reflection of wars of XVII-XVIII centuries]. Translated from French by V. Naumov, edited by I. Borisova. Moscow: Ad Marginem: 480 p. (In Russian).

7. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2005) Razvitie kategorii «politicheskaya kul’tura» v obshchestvenno-politicheskoy mysli [Development of the Category ‘Political Culture’ in Socio-Political Thought] Politeks [Political expertise: POLITEX] 1(2): 38–49. (In Russian).

8. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (ed.) (2012) Politicheskiy klass v sovremennom obshchestve [Political Cass in Modern Society]. Seriya Biblioteka RAPN. Moscow: Rosspen, 2012. (In Russian).

9. Giddens A. (2004) Uskolzayushchiy mir: kak globalizatsiya menyayet nashu zhizn [Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Ves mir». 120 p. (In Russian).

10. Haass R. (2014) Razvalivayushchiysya miroporyadok [The Unraveling]. Rossiya v globalnoy politike [Russia in Global Affairs] 6. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/razvalivayushhijsya-miroporyadok/ (accessed 23 November 2024). (In Russian).

11. Habermas J. (2000) Moralnoe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie [Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated from German by S. Shachin, edited by D. Sklyadnev, afterword by B. Markov. Moscow: Nauka. 380 p. (In Russian).

12. Habermas J. (2023) Novaya strukturnaya transformatsiya publichnoy sfery i deliberativnaya politika [A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics]. Translated from German by T. Atnashev. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 104 p. (In Russian).

13. Hobsbawm E. (2004) Epokha kraynostey. Korotkiy dvadtsatyy vek, 1914–1991 [The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991]. Moscow: Nezavisimaya gazeta. 632 p. (In Russian).

14. Ivanov E.A. (2010) Epistemologicheskie problemy postmodernistskoy filosofii istorii [Epistemological Problems of Postmodern Philosophy of History]. PhD thesis. Samara. (In Russian).

15. Nikolsky B. (1991) Voyny Rossii. V almanakhe «Russkiy kolokol», 1928 [Russia’s wars. In the Almanac «Russian Bell», 1928]. Nash sovremennik 5: 182–185. (In Russian).

16. Operativnaya kontseptsiya armii SSHA. Pobeda v slozhnom mire. 2020–2040. [U.S. Army Operational Concept. Winning in a Complex World. 2020-2040] (2015) In: Mirovoyna. Vse protiv vsekh. Noveishie kontseptsii anglo-saksov [World Warfare. All against all. The latest Anglo-Saxon concepts]. Compiled by E. Larina, V. Ovchinsky. Moscow: Knizhnyy mir. 416 p. (In Russian).

17. Polulyakh D.S. (2017) Turbulentnost kak kharakteristika sovremennogo mirovogo poryadka [Turbulence as a Characteristic of the Contemporary World Order. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science]. Special issue. (In Russian).

18. Rosenau J.N. (1990) Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 480 p.

19. S.V. Patrushev, L.E. Filippova (eds.) (2015) Istoriya Rossiyskoy assotsiatsii politicheskoy nauki [History of the Russian Political Science Association]. Series: Russian Political Science: History and Prospects. M.: Aspekt Press. (In Russian).

20. Schmitt K. (1992) Ponyatie politicheskogo [The Concept of the Political]. Voprosy sotsiologii [Issues of Sociology] 1(1): 35–67. (In Russian).

21. Suprun V.I. (ed.) (2011) Dinamika innovatsiy [Dynamics of Innovation]. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).

22. Taleb N.N. (2014) Antikhrupkost. Kak izvlech’ vygodu iz khaosa [Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder]. Moscow: KoLibri, Azbuka-Attikus. 768 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Gaman-Golutvina O.V. The Eve of Global Conflict or Contra Spem Spero? Comparative Politics Russia. 2024;15(3):4–18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-3-15-8

Views: 320


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2221-3279 (Print)
ISSN 2412-4990 (Online)