Preview

Comparative Politics Russia

Advanced search

Biden Administration Trade Cooperation Platforms

https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-1-15-45-61

Abstract

The article examines trade policy initiatives of the Biden administration. In a complex climate of domestic political polarization, the United States compete with China and defends its position in international markets. These challenges affect the areas of high technologies, digital economy, information and communications sector, renewable energy sources, and infrastructure. At the same time, an equally important problem in the context of increased geopolitical risks remains increasing the reliability of logistics and production chains, primarily for microelectronics. Addressing these challenges requires the creation of appropriate platforms that allow the United States to interact with partner countries. Within these frameworks, the United States intends to promote the priorities of the Biden administration: standards in the field of high technologies, ensuring the energy transition, protecting working conditions and inclusion. Another crucial area is promoting the fight against corruption, ensuring transparency of business processes in partner countries and training personnel. Completing these goals should attract American business and investment to the Pacific and Indian Ocean regions and Latin America. These should also increase American leverage in its strategic competition with China. At the same time, the formats of cooperation created by the United States must be insured against their internal political situation and the risks of interruption of work when there is a change of presidential administrations. In less than four years of its work (2021–2024), the Biden administration has proposed three platforms: the Global Infrastructure and Investment Partnership, the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity, and the Partnership of the Americas for Economic Prosperity. The results of their implementation are different. This article examines the two last mentioned regional platforms and describes conditions for their creation, work prospects, probable risks, and some results.

About the Author

S. V. Kislitsyn
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)
Russian Federation

Dr. Sergey V. Kislitsyn – Head of the Center for Strategic Planning Studies, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)

23, Profsoyuznaya str., Moscow, 117997



References

1. Kislitsyn S.V. (2023) Partnerstvo po global’noi infrastrukture i investitsiyam: zadachi i perspektivy razvitiya [Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment: Goals and Development Prospects]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Eсonomy and International Relations]. 67(10): 30-39. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-6710-30-39 (In Russian).

2. Komkova E. (2019) YuSMKA vmesto Nafta [USMCA Instead of NAFTA]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Eсonomy and International Relations] 63(4): 5058. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-4-50-58 (In Russian).

3. Menshikova A.M. (2021) Ekonomika v sisteme natsional’noi bezopasnosti SShA [Features of Foreign Trade Policy of J. Biden’s Democratic Administration]. SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul’tura [USA & Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture] (11): 80-92. DOI: 10.31857/S268667300017222-4 (In Russian).

4. Novikov D. Chernyavskaya K. (2017) Rol’ i mesto Transatlanticheskogo torgovogo i investitsionnogo partnerstva v evropeiskoi politike SShA [The role and position of Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnerships in US policy]. Aktual’nye problemy Evropy [Current problems of Europe] (1): 107-126. (In Russian).

5. Safronova E. (2023) Novye ‘’povoroty’’ Initsiativy ‘’Poyas i put’ ’’ v Latinskoi Amerike [New «twists and turns» of the Belt and Road Initiative in Latin America]. Latinskaya Amerika [Latin America] (10): 62-78 DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0027610-0 (In Russian).

6. Travkina N. (2019) Institut prezidentskoi vlasti v SShA: narastayushchaya disfunktsional’nost’ [Institute of presidential power in the USA: in search of a model of modern identity]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science] (4): 262-282. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2019.04.11 (In Russian).

7. Urnov A. (2023) Vtoroi sammit SShA Afrika (13-15 Dekabrya 2022 G.). [The Second United States – Africa Leaders Summit (13–15 December 2022)]. Aziya i Afrika segodnya [Asia and Africa Today] (2): 25-33. DOI: 10.31857/S032150750024405-7 (In Russian).

8. Zhuravleva V. (2016) SShA: Prezidentskaya Kampaniya 2016 [Us Presidential Campaign – 2016]. In: God Planety [Year of the Planet], pp. 132-144. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Kislitsyn S.V. Biden Administration Trade Cooperation Platforms. Comparative Politics Russia. 2024;15(1):45-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-1-15-45-61

Views: 308


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2221-3279 (Print)
ISSN 2412-4990 (Online)