States with Limited Recognition in Russian Foreign Policy: Comparative Analysis of Key Features
https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10051
Abstract
The main goal of the paper is to reveal, to compare and to summarize the essence of Russian political approaches toward particular cases of states with limited recognition and also to define in global scale whether the stance undergoes transformation or it could be considered as an attitude unique in each special matter when Moscow simultaneously supports independence of South Caucasian Republics and does not recognize Kosovo. The authors believe that there is strong need for Russia of an elaborated strategy based on a robust academic research. The authors outline two de facto approaches to secessionist formations practically applied by contemporary members of international society: international law approach and geopolitical approach. Summing up all the peculiarities of Russian position they assert that Moscow mostly keeps to geopolitical approach towards factual secessions rather international law approach, but in case of Kosovo, Palestine, South Ossetia and Abkhazia it resorts to international law approach. The authors also provisionally divide all contemporary secessionist formations in Russian policy into three groups according to priority ranking and provide results of a detailed content-analysis of Russian foreign policy formal documents and politicians statements that reveal a wide range of appellations concerning secessionist formations. The characteristics testify the fact that Russia strictly keeps to the position of territorial integrity principle respect. Finally, the authors produce two forecasts of further Russian policy towards factual secessions and conclude that Russian policy of consideration each factual secession should continue being individual as fruitful, consistent, deliberate and ensuring more profitable conditions in the context of international cooperation and security.
About the Authors
V. S. YagyaRussian Federation
Vatanyar S. Yagya - Professor, Head of the Department of World Politics, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg
I. A. Antonova
Russian Federation
Irina A. Antonova - Associate Professor, Department of World Politics, Faculty of International Relations
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Antonova, I.A. Politologicheskij analiz pozicii Rossijskoj Federacii v otnoshenii konfliktov v Kosovo i na Kipre. Diss. kand. polit. nauk (Russian Federation Stance towards Conflicts in Kosovo and Cyprus. Political Analysis. PhD Diss. (Political Science)). St.Petersburg, 2013, 208 p.
2. Caspersen, N.; Stansfield, G., eds. Unrecognized States in the International System / Unrecognized States in the International System. New York, Routledge, 2011. 253 p.
3. Clunen, A.; Trinkunas, H.Ungoverned Spaces: Alternatives to State Authority in an Era of Softened Sovereignty. Stanford, Stanford Security Studies, 2010, 324 p.
4. Dobronravin, N.A. Nepriznannye gosudarstva v “seroi zone”: osnovy vyzhivaniya i pravila suverenizatsii (Unrecognized States in the Shadow: Survival and Sovereignization). St.Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2011. 56 p.
5. Dobronravin, N.A. Novye regiony i vneshnyaya politika nepriznannykh gosudarstv (New Regions and Foreign Policy of Unrecognized States) // Aktual’nye problemy mirovoi politiki. Ed. by V.S. Yagya, M.L Lagutina. St.Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University, 2011, pp. 62-71.
6. Galinskii, I.O. Politicheskii status Pridnestrovskoi Moldavskoi Respubliki i ee politicheskikh institutov (Political Status of the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic and Its Political Institutions) // Vlast’, 2018, No. 2.
7. Howard, T. The Tragedy of Failure: Evaluating State Failure and Its Impact on the Spread of Refugees, Terrorism and War. Santa Barbara, Praeger, 2010. 156 p.
8. Kandel, P.E. Kosovskii pretsedent i postsovetskie konflikty. (Kosovo Precedent and Conflicts at Postsoviet Area) // Aktual’nye problemy Evropy, 2009, No. 3, pp. 19-38.
9. Karaganov, S. Rossii vezet (Russia is Lucky) // Rossiya v global’noi politike, 7.03.2011. Mode of access: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/pubcol/Rossii-vezet-15132
10. Klimashevskaia, O.V. Stolknovenie politicheskikh fenomenov: pravo na samoopredelenie naroda i territorial’naia tselostnost’ gosudarstva (The Clash of Political Phenomena: the Self-Determination of the People and the Territorial Integrity of the State) // Vlast’, 2018, No. 2.
11. Kuznetsov, A.S. “Nadkushennyi suverenitet”: problema kategorii “suverenitet” (Limited Sovereignty: an Issue of the Categorization). POLITEKS, 2006, No. 3. Mode of access: http://www.politex.info/content/view/264/30/
12. Lamb, R.D. Ungoverned Areas and Threats from Safe Havens. Final Report of the Ungoverned Areas Project Prepared for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, 2008. Mode of access: http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA479805
13. Lynch, D. Engaging Eurasia’s Separatist States: Unresolved Conflicts and De Facto States. Washington, United States Institute of Peace, 2004, 170 p.
14. Nikonov, V.A. Rossiia v poiske mesta v mire (Russia in a Search of its World Status) // Vestnik RAMI, 2001, No. 2.
15. Pegg, S. The Impact of De Facto States on International Law and the International Community. Mode of access: http://www.unpo.org/images/professor%20scott%20pegg.pdf
16. Popescu, N. Europe’s Unrecognised Neighbours: The EU in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. CEPS Working Document No. 260. March 2007. Mode of access: http://www.ceps.eu/book/europes-unrecognised-neighbours-euabkhazia-and-south-ossetia
17. Popov, F. Ot “bezgosudarstvennoi territorii” k “gosudarstvu de-fakto” (From Ungoverned Stated to De Facto State) // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy // 2011, No. 2. Mode of access: http://www.intertrends.ru/twentysixth/003.htm
18. Rabasa, A.; Borazm S.; Chalk, P.; Cragin, K.; Karasik, T.W. Ungoverned Territories: Understanding and Reducing Terrorism Risks. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, 2007, 398 p. Mode of access: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG561.pdf
19. Rotberg R. Failed States in a World of Terror // Foreign Affairs, July-August, 2002. Mode of access: http://ebookbrowse.com/rotberg-failed-states-in-a-world-ofterror-foreign-affairs-pdf-d46515683
20. Shlykov, P.V. «Islamskoe gosudarstvo» kak vyzov normativnosti zapadnoi modeli obshchestvennogo i gosudarstvennogo ustroistva (The Islamic State as a Challenge to the Western Model of Social and Political Order) // Aktual’nye problemy Evropy, 2016, No. 3.
21. Skvoznikov, A.N. Fenomen nepriznannykh i chastichno priznannykh gosudarstv i osobennosti ikh pravosub”ektnosti (Phenomenon of Unrecognized and Partially Recognizes States and Main Features of Their Legal Capacity) // Vestnik Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Seriya: pravo, 2011, No. 2.
22. Stanislawsky, B.H. Mapping Global Insecurity // The National Strategy Forum Review, 2010, Vol, 19, No. 4.
23. Tsygankov, P.A. Posle kavkazskogo krizisa: mirovoi poryadok i vneshnyaya politika Rossii (World Order and Russian Foreign Policy after the Crisis in August 2008) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: sotsiologiya i politologiya, 2009, No. 1, pp. 29-32.
Review
For citations:
Yagya V.S., Antonova I.A. States with Limited Recognition in Russian Foreign Policy: Comparative Analysis of Key Features. Comparative Politics Russia. 2020;11(4):92-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10051