Capitalism or Socialism: A Comparative Analysis of Sun Yat-Sen and Lenin
https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10046
Abstract
This study aims to provide a deep perspective on the debate between two camps in the beginning of the 20th century: the Chinese bourgeois revolutionary ideology represented by Sun Yat-sen (孫中山) and Marxism represented by Lenin. By studying Sun Yat-sen’s speech “Principles of People’s Livelihood and Social Revolution” and Lenin’s article “Democracy and Narodism in China,” which is in response to Sun Yat sen’s speech, this research attempts to reassess the nature of the Chinese bourgeois revolutionary road represented by the thoughts of Sun Yat-sen and remind researchers of the difficult choices between capitalist and socialist development in China as a latecomer country. This study first explains how Sun Yat-sen’s speech expressed his views on capitalism, the definition of the Principle of People’s Livelihood, and his claim of the equalization of land rights. Then, Lenin’s evaluation of Sun Yat-sen’s speech is discussed. The different views of Sun Yat-sen and Lenin on the stage of capitalism, the means and power of social revolution, and the solution of the land problem are thus presented. This study argues that the split between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Communist Party of China (CPC) in 1927 came less from the KMT’s betrayal of the revolutionary road than from the fundamental difference between Sun Yat-sen’s thoughts and Marxism. Although the ideology of Sun Yat-sen has an anti-capitalist component, he paid attention to the use of the state, rather than the society as a tool, and reconciliation, rather than revolution to ease the gap between the rich and the poor brought by capitalism. This thinking compels us to reconsider the particularity of the development path of China.
About the Author
Jui-Ling HsiehChina
PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science
Taipei, Taiwan
References
1. Chang Yansheng, “San min zhu yi pi pan (Criticism of the Three Principles of the People),” in Chang Yansheng, Forgotten Scholars: Essays on Educational Politics by Chang Yansheng (Taipei City: Independent Writer, 2016).
2. Chiang Kai-shek, “Su e zai zhong guo (Soviet Russia in China),” in Qin Xiaoyi eds., Zong tong jiang gong si xiang yan lun zong ji (President Chiang Kai-shek’s Thought and Speech Collection), vol. 9 (Taipei City: Party History Society of the Central Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang, 1984).
3. Chiang Kai-shek, “Zhong guo jing ji xue shuo (Theory of Chinese Economics),” in Qin Xiaoyi eds., Zong tong jiang gong si xiang yan lun zong ji (President Chiang Kaishek’s Thought and Speech Collection), vol. 5 (Taipei City: Party History Society of the Central Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang, 1984).
4. Lenin, V. “Democracy and Narodism in China,” in Stepan Apresyan trans., Lenin Collected Works, vol. 18 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1978).
5. Lenin, V. Two Tactics of Social-Democracy in the Democratic Revolution / in Abraham Fineburg and Julius Katzer trans., Lenin Collected Works, vol. 9. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1977.
6. Li Yuzhen, “Lie ning wei he yao yan li pi ping sun zhong shan - e luo si dang an zhong de guo min dang yu gong chan guo ji (zhi yi) (Why Lenin Severely Criticizes Sun Yat-sen - KMT and Comintern in Russian Archives (Part 1),” Century 1 (2012).
7. Li Yuzhen, Guo min dang yu gong chan guo ji (1919- 1927) (KMT and Comintern (1919-1927)) (Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2012).
8. Meisner, Maurice. Li Ta-Chao and the Origins of Chinese Marxism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.
9. Shi Chunchun, Ge ming yi fan ge ming? Jiang zhong zheng ge ming dao lu de qi yuan (Revolution or counterrevolution? The Origin of Chiang Kai-shek’s Revolutionary Road) (Taipei City: Administration Office of National Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall, 2017).
10. Socialist research society trans., Ma ke si zhu yi yu she hui shi guan (Marxism and Social Historical View) (Shanghai: Minzhi Bookstore, 1927).
11. Sun Yat-sen, “Appendix: The Social Significance of the Chinese Revolution (Translation) (Fu lu: zhong guo ge ming de she hui yi yi (yi wen),” in Qin, Xiao-yi eds., Guo fu quan ji (Complete Works of Founding Father), vol. 3 (Taipei City: Modern China Publishing House, 1989).
12. Sun Yat-Sen, “Fu mou you ren han (Reply to a Letter from a Friend),” in History Research Office of Guangdong Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of Modern History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Sun Yat-sen Research Office, Department of History, Sun Yat-sen University eds., Sun zhong shan quan ji (The Complete Works of Sun Yatsen), vol. 1 (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1981).
13. Sun Yat-sen, “Min bao fa kan ci (Published by the People’s Daily),” in Qin Xiaoyi eds., Guo fu quan ji (Complete Works of Founding Father), vol. 2 (Taipei City: Modern China Publishing House, 1989).
14. Sun Yat-sen, “Min sheng zhu yi yu she hui ge ming (Principles of People’s Livelihood and Social Revolution),” in Qin Xiaoyi eds., Guo fu quan ji (Complete Works of Founding Father), vol. 3 (Taipei City: Modern China Publishing House, 1989).
15. Sun Yat-sen, “San min zhu yi yu zhong guo min zu zhi qian tu (The Three Principles of the People and the Future of the Chinese Nation),” in Qin Xiaoyi eds., Guo fu quan ji (Complete Works of Founding Father), vol. 3 (Taipei City: Modern China Publishing House, 1989).
16. Sun Yat-sen, “San min zhu yi: Min sheng zhu yi di er jiang (The Three Principles of the People: Principle of People’s Livelihood Second Lecture),” in Qin Xiaoyi eds., Guo fu quan ji (Complete Works of Founding Father), vol. 1 (Taipei City: Modern China Publishing House, 1989).
17. Sun Yat-sen, “Ti chang guo jia she hui zhu yi (Advocating State Socialism),” in Qin Xiaoyi eds., Guo fu quan ji (Complete Works of Founding Father), vol. 3 (Taipei City: Modern China Publishing House, 1989).
18. Sun Yat-sen, “Ti chang min sheng zhu yi zhi zhen yi (The True Meaning of Advocating the Principle of People’s Livelihood),” in Qin Xiaoyi eds., Guo fu quan ji (Complete Works of Founding Father), vol. 3 (Taipei City: Modern China Publishing House, 1989).
19. Sun Yat-sen, “Zhong guo zhi di er bu (China Second Step),” in Qin Xiaoyi eds., Guo fu quan ji (Complete Works of Founding Father), vol. 3 (Taipei City: Modern China Publishing House, 1989).
20. Zhang Hongfeng, “Gong chan dang xuan yan de shi dai xing fen xi ji qi dang dai jia zhi (Analysis of the Times of Manifesto of the Communist Party and Its Contemporary Value),” Journal of Changchun University 24: 1 (2014).
Review
For citations:
Hsieh J. Capitalism or Socialism: A Comparative Analysis of Sun Yat-Sen and Lenin. Comparative Politics Russia. 2020;11(4):27-41. https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10046