SOCIAL AND HUMANISTIC ORIENTATION IN NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGIES OF RUSSIA AND GERMANY: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS
https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2019-10030
Abstract
The aim of the research is to carry out a comparative analysis of national security strategies of Russia and Germany based on the universal human values they contain, excluding geopolitical and military aspects. The choice of the strategies of the two states is conditioned by the existence of common legal, cultural and historical traditions. The article explores the evolution of the “national security” notion which content has expanded both at the normative and scientific levels due to the appearance of new threats and dangers. The authors prove that the basis underlying the national security strategies of the two countries includes not only external policy interests but also rights and freedoms of a person and citizen. Moreover, the strategies also focus on eliminating and leveling threats by ensuring internal and external security as an integral whole and not by means of global security. In both strategies: the human rights, a person and society are in the first place; their humanistic and social orientation is visible; provision of the third and fourth rights of the generations of the mankind is reflected in the normative documents regarding national security; the presence of collectivism features in the mentality of both nations is reflected in the participation of civil society institutions in ensuring national security. Differences in the national security strategies of Russia and Germany are conditioned by different levels of social and economic development. Thus, a major emphasis in the Russian strategy is made on solving social, economic and cultural tasks. The authors prove that the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation focuses on improving the quality of life criteria to the world standards and on internal threats. This is predetermined by the fact that human rights and freedoms have not become firmly established as the highest value in the mindset and mentality of all social groups, when it is enough to have a statement regarding them in the Constitution or other law.
Keywords
About the Authors
Dmitriy A. LipinskiiRussian Federation
Dr. of Legal Sciences, Professor, Master’s Programs Department
Tolyatti
Alexandra A. Musatkina
Russian Federation
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Bachelor’s Programs Department
Tolyatti
References
1. America’s Recent Past. Edited by Franklin D. Mitchell and Richard O. Davies. New York, London, Sydney, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1969. 440 p.
2. Babintsev, V.P.; Rimskii, V.P. Biurokratizatsiia vuza kak antiintellektual’nyi protsess (The Bureaucratization of the University as an Anti-Intellectual Process) // Nauka. Iskusstvo. Kul’tura, 2014, No. 4, pp. 6-17.
3. Brown, H. Thinking about National Security: Defense and Foreign Policy in a Dangerous World. Colorado, Westvier Press, 1983. 288 p.
4. Bulavin, V.I. Natsional’naia bezopasnost’ v sovremennoi Rossii (National Security in Modern Russia): dis. …Cand. of Law. N.Novgorod, 1999. 220 p.
5. Buzan, В.; Waever, О.; Wilde, J. Security a New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO Lynne Rienner, 1998. 239 p.
6. Chumak, A.V. Natsional’naia bezopasnost’ Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Soedinennykh Shtatov Ameriki: sopostavitel’nyi analiz kontseptual’nykh osnov, mekhanizmov i tekhnologii (National Security of the Russian Federation and the United States of America: Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Foundations, Mechanisms and Technologies). Dissertatsiia na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata politicheskikh nauk. N. Novgorod, 2009. 140 p.
7. Evdokimova, D.A. Vliianie ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti na natsional’nuiu bezopasnost’ Rossiiskoi Federatsii (The Impact of Economic Security on the National Security of the Russian Federation) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 26: Gosudarstvennyi audit, 2018, No. 2, pp. 140-148.
8. Genscher, H.D. Deutsche AuBenpolitik von 1949 bis 1995 ‒ In Deutschland // Zeitschnft fur Politik, Kultur, Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft, 1995, No. 2, pp. 30-33.
9. Gray, C.S. Comparative Strategic Culture // Parameters, 1984, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 27-31.
10. Kardashova, I.B. Obshchestvennaia bezopasnost’ v sisteme natsional’noi bezopasnosti (Public Security in the National Security System) // Nauchnyi portal MVD Rossii, 2008, No. 4, pp. 85-89.
11. Kostiuk, M.E. Iazykova politika i natsional’naia bezopasnost’: puti vzaimodeistviia (Language Policy and National Security: Ways of Interaction). Moscow, 2012. 210 p.
12. Lippman, W. US Foreign Polisy: Shield of the Republic. Boston, 1943. 220 p.
13. Mal’ko, A.V.; Lipinskii, D.A.; Salomatin, A. Iu. Problemy realizatsii pravovoi politiki v sfere internatsionalizatsii vysshego iuridicheskogo obrazovaniia (Problems of Implementation of Legal Policy in the Field of Internationalization of Higher Legal Education) // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo, 2019, No. 1, pp. 55-71.
14. Mamonov, V.V. Konstitutsionnye osnovy natsional’noi bezopasnosti (Constitutional Foundations of National Security): dis. …Dr. of Law. Saratov, 2004. 411 p.
15. National Security Act Of 1947. Mode of access: https://www.webcitation.org/5Xi9eEYG9?url=http://www.intelligence.gov/0-natsecact_1947.shtml
16. Nesterov, V.N. Obrazovanie i natsional’naia bezopasnost’ (Education and National Security) // Vestnik voennogo universiteta, 2009, No. 2, pp. 31-35.
17. Osnovy sotsial’noi kontseptsii Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi (Fundamentals of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church). Moscow: Patriarkhiia, 2000. 40 p.
18. Protasov, V.N. Irratsional’nye metody vlastvovaniia kak instrument samosokhraneniia i ekspansii biurokraticheski organizovannykh sistem upravleniia (Irrational Methods of Government as a Tool for Self-Preservation and Expansion of Bureaucratic Organized Management Systems) // Gosudarstvo i pravo,2017, No. 10, pp. 55-61.
19. Pushkarev, E.A. Bezopasnost’ lichnosti v sisteme natsional’noi bezopasnosti Rossii (Personal Security in the System of National Security of Russia) // Gumanitarnye i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki,2006, No. 6, pp. 152-155.
20. Richthnien, V. Verteidigungspohtische Richtlinten fur den Geschaftsbereich des Bundesministers der Verteidigung vom 26 11 1992 // Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik,1992, Vol. 9, No. 28, pp. 1137-1151.
21. Rothschild, E. What is Security // Daedalus, 1995, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 53-98.
22. Sebenius, James K.; Peterson, Peter G. Rethinking America’s Security: The Primacy of the Domestic Agenda / In Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order, edited by Graham T. Allison and Gregory Treverton, 57-93. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1992.
23. Semenov, O.Iu.; Tolkachev, V.V. Evropeiskaia bezopasnost’ i interesy Germanii v otsenkakh ekspertnoanaliticheskogo soobshchestva FRG (European Security and the Interests of Germany in the Assessments of the Expertanalytical Community of Germany) // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia Politologiia Regionovedenie Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2012, No. 4 (1), pp. 357-359.
24. Shaburov, A.S. Pravovaia bezopasnost’ v sisteme natsional’noi bezopasnosti (Legal Security in the National Security System) // Vestnik Iuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia. Pravo, 2015, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 23-24.
25. Sheludchenko, H.P. Sotrudnichestvo Germanii i Rossii v oblasti nauki i obrazovaniia v nachale XXI veka (Cooperation of Germany and Russia in the Field of Science and Education at the Beginning of the XXI Century) // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta,2009, No. 4, pp. 122-132.
26. Smith, S. The Increasing Insecurity in Security Studies Conceptualising Security in the Last Twenty Years // Contemporary Security Policy, 1999, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 72-81.
27. Strel’tsina, M.M. Institutsional’nye usloviia sozdaniia pravitel’stvennykh vedomstv v Rossii i SShA: sravnitel’nyi analiz (Institutional Conditions for the Establishment of Government Departments in Russia and the United States: a Comparative Analysis). Dissertatsiia na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata politicheskikh nauk. Moscow, 2004. 140 p.
28. Suhrke, A. Human Security and the Interest of States // Security Dialogue,1999, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 266-276.
29. Wolfers, A. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: JohnsHopkins University Press, 1962. 250 p
Review
For citations:
Lipinskii D.A., Musatkina A.A. SOCIAL AND HUMANISTIC ORIENTATION IN NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGIES OF RUSSIA AND GERMANY: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS. Comparative Politics Russia. 2019;10(3):58-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2019-10030