HAMAS AND HEZBOLLAH AS ACTORS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND PROSPECTS OF INTEGRATION IN THE WORLD ORDER
https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2018-9-2-105-113
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of non-state entities in a changing nature of world politics. Hamas and Hezbollah are seen as major non-governmental actors in the Middle East with great potential to infl uence regional political processes including the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks. The authors made an attempt to conduct comparative analysis of those movements’ compliance with the benchmarks of an actor (drafted by J. Nye, R. Keohane and other prominent political scientists) so as to assess its roles and positions in the region. Suggestions on shaping foreign policy towards those nonstate actors were made and strategies of its incorporation in the world order were investigated. The authors described negative and positive projections of such an engagement of Hamas and Hezbollah in the regional processes and gave their perspective on the feasibility of each scenario.
About the Authors
Vladimir M. Morozov
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Candidate of History, Associate Professor, Department of Diplomacy, Vice-Rector for human recourses
Russian Federation
Candidate of History, Associate Professor, Department of Diplomacy, Vice-Rector for human recourses
Aysha B. Khachirova
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
MA in International Relations
Russian Federation
MA in International Relations
References
1. Friman, Ch. Kogda bessil’na diplomatiia // Rossiia v global’noi politike, No. 4, 03.09.2014. Mode of access: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/Kogda-bessilnadiplomatiya-16917
2. Janis, I.; Mann, L. Decision-Making. A Psychological Analysis of Confl ict, Choice, Commitment. NY.: Free Press, 1977.
3. Keohane, R.; Nye, J. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. L.: The Book Service Ltd, 1977.
4. Keohane, R.; Nye, J. Translational Relations and World Politics. // International Organization, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 329-349.
5. Kuznetsov, I.I. Transnatsional’nye otnosheniia v sisteme gosudarstv: partnerstvo ili novyi vitok sopernichestva? (Transnational Relations in the System of States: Partnership or a New Round of Competition?) // Kosmopolis. Al’manakh. 1999, pp.122-126.
6. Lebedeva, M.M. Mirovaia politika v XXI veke: aktory, protsessy, problem (World Politics in the XXI Century: Actors, Processes, Problems). Moscow: MGIMOUniversitet, 2009. Pp 40-44.
7. Megaterrorism: New Challenges for a New Century / Ed. by A. Fedorov. Moscow: Human Rights Publishers, 2003.
8. NATO i Rossiia v global'nom grazhdanskom obshchestve (NATO and Russia in Global Civil Society) / Ed. by O.A. Kolobov. Moscow: AGPI, 2005. Pp. 16-20.
9. Nye, J. Understanding Global Confl ict and Cooperation: an Introduction to Theory and History. Boston: Pearson, 2017.
10. Olimpiev, A.Iu. Mezhdunarodnye problemy Blizhnego Vostoka. 1960-e – 2013g. (International Problems of the Middle East. 1960-2013). Moscow: IuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2013.
11. Risse, Th. Transnational Actors and World Politics / Handbook of International Relations. L.: Sage, 2002.
12. Solov’ev, E. Setevye organizatsii transnatsional’nogo terrorizma (Networks of Transnational Terrorism) // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2004, No. 2.
13. UN Resolution 42/159 of December 7th, 1987. Mode of access: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/ RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/518/49/IMG/NR051849.pdf
14. ةيمالسإلا ةمواقملا ةكرح قاثيم (سامح) (Мисак ХАМАС. Харакя-аль-мукавама аль-исламийя) //Aljazeera: web-site, Qatar. Mode of access: http://www.aljazeera.net/specialfi les/ pages/0b4f24e4-7c14-4f50-a831-ea2b6e73217d
Review
For citations:
Morozov V.M., Khachirova A.B. HAMAS AND HEZBOLLAH AS ACTORS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND PROSPECTS OF INTEGRATION IN THE WORLD ORDER. Comparative Politics Russia. 2018;9(2):105-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2018-9-2-105-113
Views:
899
Email this article 
