UNIVERSITY’S THIRD MISSION AND STAKEHOLDER GOVERNANCE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2018-00001
Abstract
It is common to evaluate the level of engagement of the university to the regional development via the different third mission indicators of success. We propose to complement the traditional approach to frame such an indicators with a purely theoretical consideration of the benefi ts of the stakeholder governance model that connects the university and the key players of regional development altogether. In this paper we focus on the problems of the collective decision making under the stakeholder governance model, and examine two examples of the traditional third mission indicators models. The main point of our analysis is to show that the bringing into consideration the stakeholder governance model allows to see the motivations and the prospects of engagement for every stakeholder in advance, that may significantly affect the planning of the regional development success.
About the Authors
N. V. Golovko
Novosibirsk State University
Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian
Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences, Professor, Chair of Epistemology and History of Philosophy, Novosibirsk State University; Leading Research Fellow, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
O. V. Zinevich
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences, Head of the Chair of International Relations and Regional Studies
E. A. Ruzankina
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sciences, Associate Professor, Chair of International Relations and Regional Studies
References
1. Ablazhey, A.M.; Golovko, N.V. Akademicheskaya nauka v sovremennom obshchestve: kadrovoe vosproizvodstvo, adaptatsionnye protsessy i neoliberal’nye tsennosti (Academic Science in the Contemporary Society: Manpower Reproduction, Mitigation and Neoliberal Values). Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 2012. 287 p.
2. Charles, D.; Benneworth, P. Evaluating the Regional Contribution of an HEI: A Benchmarking Approach. Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle, 2002.
3. Etzkowitz, H.; Webster, A.; Gebhardt, C.; Terra, B. The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution from Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm // Research Policy, 2000, Vol. 29.
4. Freeman, R. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
5. Garlick, S.; Langworthy, A. Benchmarking University Community Engagement: Developing a National Approach in Australia // Higher Education Management and Policy, 2008, Vol. 20(2), pp. 1-12.
6. Golovko, N.V. Predprinimatel’skiy universitet i funktsionalizm A. Stinchkomba (Entrepreneurial University and Stinchcombe’s Functionalism) // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Filosofi ya, 2014, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 53-61.
7. Golovko, N.V.; Degtyareva, V.V.; Madiukova, S.A. Predprinimatel’skiy universitet i teoriya Troinoy spirali (Entrepreneurial University and the Triple Helix Theory) // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2014, № 8-9, pp. 45-53.
8. Golovko, N.V.; Ruzankina, E.A. Predprinimatel’skiy universitet: akademicheskiy kapitalizm i mnogopol’zovatel’skoe upravlenie (Entrepreneurial University: Academic Capitalism and Stakeholder Governance) // Vlast’, 2016, No. 5, pp. 67-74.
9. Golovko, N.V.; Zinevich, O.V.; Ruzankina, E.A. Universitet tret’ego pokoleniya: B. Klark i I. Uisema (Third Generation University: B. Clark and J. Wissema) // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2016, No. 8-9, pp. 40-47.
10. Gorason, B.; Maharajh, R.; Schmoch, U. New Activities of Universities in Transfer and Extension: Multiple Requirements and Manifold Solutions // Science and Public Policy, 2009, Vol. 36(2).
11. Hemmati, M. Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability. London: Earthscan, 2002.
12. Jongbloed, B.; Enders, J.; Salerno, C. Higher Education and Its Communities: Interconnections, Interdependencies and a Research Agenda // Higher Education, 2008, Vol. 56.
13. Leal Filho, W.; Brandli, L. Engaging Stakeholders for Sustainable Development / W. Leal Filho and L. Brandli (eds.). Engaging Stakeholders in Education for Sustainable
14. Development at University Level. Springer, 2016.
15. Molas-Gallart, J.; Salter, A.; Patel, P.; Scott, A.; Duran, X. Measuring Third Stream Activities. Final Report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: University of Sussex, 2002.
16. Schoen, A. (ed.) Methodological Guide – The Prime Project of Observatory of European Universities. Brussels: European Commission, 2006.
17. Shore, C.; McLauchlan, L. Third Mission Activities, Commercialization and Academic Entrepreneurs // Social Anthropology, 2012, Vol. 20.
18. Zinevich, O.V.; Balmasova, T.A. «Tret’ia missiya» i sotsial’naya vovlechennost’ universitetov: k postanovke problemy (The «Third Mission» and Social Engagement of Universities: To the Problem Statement) // Vlast’, 2015, No. 6, pp. 67-72.
Review
For citations:
Golovko N.V., Zinevich O.V., Ruzankina E.A. UNIVERSITY’S THIRD MISSION AND STAKEHOLDER GOVERNANCE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. Comparative Politics Russia. 2018;9(1):5-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2018-00001
Views:
1055
Email this article 