Preview

Comparative Politics Russia

Advanced search

Psychological Status of Russian Society between the Latest Parliamentary and the Future Presidential Elections: A Comparative Analysis

https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-119-129

Abstract

Paper presents the data from the study of psychological status of Russian society. As the study has shown a number of psychological parameters (concepts of justice, some political values, the level of infl uence of President Putin in public mentality) preserves rather consistent for a long time. Other indicators are transformed substantially under the infl uence of some factors including elections. Inertial character of the last elections gave tactical victory for authorities but caused political demobilization of Russian society. Respodents’ images of Prime Minister, Presidential Administration, State Duma, governors, municipal power, courts, procurators and political parties substantially declined after 2016 elections. At the same time one could see the increase of the infl uence of the Council of Federation, security agencies and intelligence service. It also should be noticed that a radical views substantially declined as the conservative trend increased. It means that success of the United Russia was proved. At the same time one can speak about a clear growth of the left moods as the growth of the socialist and communist ideas was fi xed in this study. Elections improved the image of authorities: respondents evaluate them more positively now. There is a new trend of decline of traditionally personifi ed images of authority and the growth of the infl uence of political parties and groups though all the parties have lost their infl uence. One can suggest that citizens got used to this party system. The demand to have a formal party representation proves that values of formal democracy have been rooted in mass mentality.

About the Author

Elena B. Shestopal
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Dr. of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Political Sociology and Psychology, the Faculty of Political Science


References

1. Caplan, B. Rational Ignorance versus Rational Irrationality // Kyklo, 2001, Vol. 54. No. 1, pp. 3-26.

2. Feldman, S.; Conover, P.J. Candidates, Issues and Voters. The Role of Inference in Political Perception // Journal of Politics, 1983, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 810-839.

3. Granberg, D., Kasmer, J., Nanneman, T. An Empirical Examination of Two Theories of Political Perception // Political Research Quarterly, 1988, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 29-46.

4. Fiske, S.; Neuberg, S.N. A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Infl uences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (ed. by M.P. Zanna). New York: Academic Press, 1990, Vol. 23, pp. 1-74.

5. King Pu-tsung. The Press, Candidate Images, and Voter Perceptions. in Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory (ed. by M. McCombs, D.L. Shaw, D. Weaver). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1997. Pp. 31-32.

6. Lapkin, V.V.; Semenenko, I.A. “Chelovek Politicheskii” pered vyzovamy “infomodernity” (”Homo Politicus” in the Face of “Infomodernity” Challenges) // Polis. Poiticheskie issledovaniya, 2013, No. 6, С. 64-81.

7. Presnyakova, L.A. Struktura lichnostnogo vospriyatiya politicheskoi vlasti (Structure of Personal Perception of Political Authority) // Polis, Political studies, 2000, No. 4, pp. 135-139.

8. Shestopal, E. Obrazy vlasti v epokhu peremen (Psikhologicheskaia transformatsiia obshchestva v postsovetskoi Rossii) (Images of Authorities during Time of Change (Psychological Transformation of Society in Post-Soviet Russia)) / Chetvert’ veka posle SSSR: liudi, obshchestvo, reformy. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU, 2015. Pp. 291-330.

9. Shestopal, Elena. New Trends in Russian Political Mentality / Putin 3.0. Lexington books, 2016. Pp. 37-67.

10. Sniderman, P.M.; Brody, R.A.; Tetlock, P.E. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press. 1993. 324 p.

11. Sullivan, J.L.; Oxendine, A.; Borgida, E.; Riedel, E.; Jackson, M.; Dial, J. The Importance of Political Context for Understanding Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis // Political Behavior, 2007 March, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 31-67.

12. Zadorin, I.V. Kachestvo i kachestva vlasti (Quality and Qualities of Power: Popular Perception) // Politeia, 2005, No. 2, pp. 96-115.


Review

For citations:


Shestopal E.B. Psychological Status of Russian Society between the Latest Parliamentary and the Future Presidential Elections: A Comparative Analysis. Comparative Politics Russia. 2017;8(2):119-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-119-129

Views: 825


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2221-3279 (Print)
ISSN 2412-4990 (Online)