Eurasianism and eurasian integration in the political ideologies and practice of Turkey
https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-1-58-76
Abstract
Abstract: The papers analyses transformations of Turkish Eurasianism as a geopolitical concept and attitudes of Turkish political elite towards ideas of Eurasian integration in the 1990s and fi rst decade of the 2000s in comparative perspective. For both Russia and Turkey the geographical dimensions of Eurasia and Eurasianism itself has never been a core characteristic of this concept. In the Turkish socio-political thought Eurasianism combined features of different ideologies (Pan-Turkism, Pan-Islamism, Turkism and Neo-Ottomanism), which offer diverse strategies for Turkey’s regional leadership. Within this polyphony of interpretations and approaches towards Eurasianism in Turkey two theoretical trends became the most prevailing: the fi rst one is a concept of Eurasia as a geographical meta-region, the second one comprises various Turkish versions of Eurasian / Neo-Eurasian ideologies. Turkish politicians and ideologists began to use geographical concept of Eurasia in different confi gurations (like Afro-Eurasia) mostly to defi ne the special “central” role of Turkey in the vast region of modern Middle East, the Balkans, Central Asia, and the Caucasus. Thus the concept of Eurasia became a universal instrument for both politicians and public intellectuals trying to prove the exceptional geopolitical signifi cance of Turkey for the global world-system.
Keywords
About the Author
Pavel V. ShlykovRussian Federation
Middle East History Department, Institute of Asian and African Studies
Candidate of History, Associate Professor
References
1. Acar, Özgen. Ankara-Moskova-Orta Asya Stratejik Üçgeni // Cumhuriyet, 11/09/2001.
2. Akçalı, Emel; Perinçek, Mehmet. Kemalist Eurasianism: An Emerging Geopolitical Discourse in Turkey // Geopolitics, 2009, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, pp. 550-569.
3. Altunışık, Meliha B.; Martin, Lenore G. Making Sense of Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East under AKP // Turkish Studies, 2011, Vol. 12, Iss. 4, pp. 569-587.
4. Aras, Bülent. Turkey’s Policy in the Former Soviet South: Assets and Options // Turkish Studies, 2000, Vol. 1, Iss. 1.
5. Aras, Bülent; Fidan, Hakan. Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination // New Perspectives on Turkey, 2009, No. 40, pp. 202-203.
6. Avraysa sekilleniyor // Milliyet, 1/11/1992. Aydın, M. Turkey and Central Asia: Challenges of Change // Central Asian Survey, 1996, Vol. 2, Iss. 15.
7. Balcı, Bayram. Fethullah Gülen’s Missionary Schools in Central Asia and their Role in the Spreading of Turkism and Islam // Religion, State and Society, 2003, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 151-177.
8. Baran, Zeyno. The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Implications for Turkey // The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Oil Window to the West. Front Cover. S. Frederick Starr, Svante E. Cornell. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, 2005. Pp. 103-118.
9. Bilgin, Pınar. A Return to “Civilizational Geopolitics” in the Mediterranean? Changing Geo-Political Images of the European Union and Turkey in the Post-Cold War Era // Geopolitics, 2004, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 269-291.
10. Bilgin, Pınar. Only Strong States Can Survive in Turkey’s Geography: The Uses of “Geopolitical Truths” in Turkey // Political Geography, 2007, Vol. 26, Iss. 7, pp. 748-749.
11. Bu sistem “Yeni Avrasyacılık” değil “Yeni Avrusyacılık”tır / Zaman, 10/12/2004.
12. Çağaptay, Soner. The AKP’s Foreign Policy: The Misnomer of “Neo-Ottomanism” // Turkey Analyst, 2009, Vol. 2, No. 8. Mode of access: http://www.turkeyanalyst. org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/item/164-the-akpsforeign-policy-the-misnomer-of-neo-ottomanism.html
13. Çeçen, Anıl. Türkiye ve Avrasya. Ankara: Fark, 2006. Cem, İsmail. Turkey in the New Century: speeches and texts (1995-2001) / İsmail Cem. Rustem: Nicosia, Mersin 2001. P. 60.
14. Criss, Nur Bilge. Dismantling Turkey: The Will of the People? // Turkish Studies, 2010, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 45-58.
15. Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Stratejik Derinlik / Ahmet Davutoğlu. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2001, s. 52-58.
16. Davutoglu, Ahmet. Stratejik Derinlik: Tü rkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu / Ahmet Davutoglu. İ stanbul: Kü re Yayınları, 2001. 584 s.
17. Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Türkiye Merkez Ülke Olmalı // Radikal, 26/02/2004. Mode of Access: http://www.radikal. com.tr/haber.php?haberno=107581 Defense White Paper 2000. Mode of access: http:// mercury.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/154907/ ipublicationdocument_singledocument/8be48d28-5065- 40d4-a82c-8f001350113e/en/Turkey_2000eng.pdf
18. Değişen Dünya ve Türkiye // Milliyet, 12/12/1991, s. 12, 19. Mode of Access: http://gazetearsivi.milliyet.com.tr/ GununYayinlari/tm2BCwIolnBK62fQPT2F8w_x3D__x3D_
19. Demirel, Süleyman. The Compatibility of Islam, Democracy and Secularism // Perceptions, 1997, Vol. 2, Iss. 2. Mode of Access: http://sam.gov.tr/wp-content/ uploads/2012/02/SuleymanDemirel1.pdf
20. Dugin, Aleksandr. Rus Jeopolitiği: Avrasyacı Yaklaşım / Aleksandr Dugin. İstanbul: Küre, 2003. 391 s.
21. Dugin: Turkiye ve Avrasya // Zaman, 18/07/2004. Ersanlı, Büşra. Can Eurasia Be an Identity Issue for Turkish Foreign Policy? // Turkish Views on Eurasia / editor İsmail Soysal, assistant editor Sevsen Aslantepe. Istanbul: Foundation for Middle East and Balkan Studies, 2001.
22. Ersanlı, Büşra. Türkiye’nin Dış İlişkilerinde Türkçülük ve Avrasya // Bağımsızlıklarının 10. Yılında Türk Cumhuriyetleri: Azerbaycan, Kazakistan, Kırgızistan, Özbekistan, Türkmenistan / Ed. Emine Gürsoy-Naskali, Erdal Şahin. Haarlem: SOTA 2002, s. 149-154.
23. İlhan, Attilâ. Sultan Galiyef: Avrasya’da Dolaşan Hayalet / Attilâ İlhan. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2000. 320 s.
24. İlhan, Suat. Türklerin Jeopolitiği ve Avrasyacılık / Suat İlhan. Ankara: Bilgi, 2005. 220 s. Imanov, Vügar. Avrasyacılık: Rusya’nın Kimlik Arayışı. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2008. S. 328-334.
25. Kalın, İbrahim. Turkey and the Middle East: Ideology or Geo-Politics? // Private View, 2008, Vol. 13, p. 26.
26. Kılınç: AB’den destek yok, Doğu’ya bak // Hürriyet, 07/03/2002. Mode of Access: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ kilinc-abden-destek-yok-doguya-bak-58353
27. Kınıklıoğlu, Suat. The Return of Ottomanism // Today’s Zaman, 20/03/2007.
28. Kireev, N.G. Rossiisko-turetskie otnosheniia v kontekste evraziiskikh kontseptsii (Russian-Turkish Relations in the Context of Eurasian Concepts) / Rossiisko-turetskie otnosheniia: istoriia, sovremennoe sostoianie i perspektivy (Russian-Turkish Relations: History, Current Situation, and Prospects). Moscow: Institut vostokovedeniia RAN, 2003, pp. 247-248.
29. Külebi, Ali. The Forgotten Option: Turkish Eurasianism // Hürriyet Daily News, 23/08/2006. Mode of Access: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/the-forgotten-option-turkish-eurasianism.aspx?pageID=438&n=the-forgotten-option-turkish-eurasianism-2006-08-23
30. Kut, Gün. Elçibey’in Sonu, Türkiye Modelinin Sonudur // Cumhuriyet, 24/06/1993. Kut, Şule. The Contours of Turkish Foreign Policy in the 1990s // Turkey in World Politics: An Emerging Multiregional Power / Edited by Barry Rubin & Kemal Kirişçi. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press, 2002. Pp. 8-10.
31. Landau, Jacob M. Pan-Turkism: From Irredentism to Cooperation. London: Hurst & Company, 1995. P. 194.
32. Laruelle, Marlène. Russo-Turkish Rapprochement through the Idea of Eurasia: Alexander Dugin’s Networks in Turkey // The Jamestown Foundation Occasional Paper (April 2008). Mode of access: http://www.jamestown.org/ uploads/media/Jamestown-LaruelleRussoTurkish.pdf
33. Mackinder, Halford John. Democratic Ideals and Reality: A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction. Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1944.
34. Mackinder, Halford John. Geografi cheskaia os’ istorii (Geographical Axis of History) // Polis, 1994, No. 4, pp. 162-170.
35. Mango, Andrew. Turkish Model // Middle Eastern Studies, 1993, Vol. 29, Iss. 4, pp. 726-757. Moskova’ya Alti Cevap // Miliyet, 20/10/1994.
36. Özdağ, Ümit. Türkiye’nin Türk Dünyası Politikasının Teorik Çerçevesi // Asya-Avrupa, 1/12/2004.
37. Özdoğan, Günay Göksu. Turan’dan ‘Bozkurt’a: Tek Parti Döneminde Türkçülük (1931-1946). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2002.
38. Perinçek, Doğu. Avrasya Seçeneği: Türkiye İçin Bağımsız Dış Politika / Doğu Perinçek. Istanbul: Kaynak, 1996. 136 s.
39. Perinçek, Mehmet. Avrasyacılık: Türkiye’deki Teori ve Pratiği / Mehmet Perinçek. Ankara: Bilgi, 2006. S. 139-141.
40. Robins, Philip. Between Sentiment and Self-Interest: Turkey’s Policy Toward Azerbaijan and the Central Asian States // The Middle East Journal, 1993, Vol. 47, Iss. 4, pp. 593-610.
41. Rusya Federasyonu ile Türkiye Cumhuriyeti arasında Avrasya’da İşbirliği Eylem Planı (İkili İşbirliğinden Çok Boyutlu Ortaklığa) / Rusya Federasyonu’nun Türkiye Büyükelçiliği. Mode of Access: http://www.turkey.mid.ru/ relat_2_t.html
42. Rusya’ya karşı ortak tavır // Miliyet, 20/10/1994.
43. Rusya’dan Çin’e bir örgüt // Radikal, 12/08/2007. Mode of Access: http://www.radikal.com.tr/ek_haber. php?ek=r2&haberno=7341
44. Shlykov, P.V. Kuda Idet Turciya: Metamorfozy Prozapadnogo Kursa Razvitiya (Where is Turkey Heading for? Metamorphoses of pro-Western Course of Development) // Contemporary Europe, 2013, No. 1 (53), pp. 58-75.
45. Shlykov, P.V. Voennaya Ehlita v Politicheskoj Sisteme Tureckoj Respubliki (Military Elite in the Political System of Turkey) // Elity stran Vostoka (Elites of the East Countries). Moscow: Kluch-S, 2011. Pp. 31-60.
46. Sözen, Ahmet. A Paradigm Shift in Turkish Foreign Policy: Transition and Challenges // Turkish Studies, 2010, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 107-108.
47. Speech Delivered by the Minister of Foreign Affairs H.E. Ahmet Davutoğlu at the 28th Annual Conference on US-Turkish Relations Organized by ATC-DEIK (Washington DC, 2 June 2009) / Republic of Turkey. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Mode of access: http:// www.mfa.gov.tr/minster_s-speechat-the-28th-annual-conference-on-us-turkish-relations.en.mfa] T.B.M.M. Tutanak Dergisi. Cilt: 65, 1-inci Birleşim, 1.9.1994 Perşembe, s. 16-32 / Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi Resmi İnternet Sitesi. Mode of Access: https:// www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/TUTANAK/TBMM/d19/ c065/tbmm19065001.pdf
48. Taşpınar, Ömer. Batı’ya Kızgınlık Büyüyor // Radikal, 27/07/2005. Mode of Access: http://www.radikal.com.tr/ yorum/batiya-kizginlik-buyuyor-753072/ TBMM’yi yoğun gündem bekliyor // Milliyet, 31/08/1994, s. 17.
49. Tellal, Erel. Türk Dış Politikasında Avrasya Seçeneği // Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2005, Vol. 2, Iss. 5, p. 50.
50. Türk Kurultayı İzmir’de başladı // Milliyet, 21/10/1994. Türkiye’nin Türk dünyasında ‘’ağabey’ değil ‘ekonomik partner’ olduğu vurgulandı // Milliyet, 6/10/1999.
51. Urazova, E.I. Turtsiia segodnia: ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo so stranami Iuzhnogo Kavkaza i Tsentral’noi Azii (Turkey Today: Economic Cooperation with the States of South Caucasus and Central Asia). Moscow: Institut vostokovedeniia RAN, 2012. 278 p.
52. Uslu, Emrullah. Ulusalcılık: The Neo-nationalist Resurgence in Turkey // Turkish Studies, 2008, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 73-97.
53. Winrow, Gareth M. Turkey in Post-Soviet Central Asia. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, Russia and CIS Programme, 1995. 53 p.
54. Yanık, Lerna K. The Politics of Educational Exchange: Turkish Education in Eurasia // Europe-Asia Studies, 2004, Vol. 56, Iss. 2, pp. 300-301.
55. Yavuz, Hakan. Turkish Identity and Foreign Policy in Flux: The Rise of Neo-Ottomanism // Middle East Critique, 1998, Vol. 7, Iss. 12, pp. 19-41.
56. Zirvede sıkıntı // Milliyet, 31/10/1992.
Review
For citations:
Shlykov P.V. Eurasianism and eurasian integration in the political ideologies and practice of Turkey. Comparative Politics Russia. 2017;8(1):58-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-1-58-76