INSTITUTIONS, AGENTS AND PRACTICES OF IMMIGRATION CONTROL IN THE CONSOLIDATION OF SOCIETY: THE CASE OF FRANCE
https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-4(25)-62-71
Abstract
Drawing on recent insight in citizenship regime literature, this article develops a macrotheoretical framework for understanding social and political tolerance of ethnic minorities. The paper attempts to analyze and describe the French experience of the role of institutions, agents and practices of immigration control in the consolidation of the society with the mechanisms for participatory democracy. It is shown that the question of the role and position of migrants in the host societies actualize the development of specific social policy constructing the image of migrants, the development of the legislative base, controlling migration flows, mechanisms of their adaptation and integration into the host society. It is concluded that as a result of the implementation of the migration policy, France prefers to rely on the discursive approach, the priority of human rights, rather than security considerations - dialectical contradiction and interaction that can be observed in the analysis of migration policies in the EU as a whole.
About the Author
A. G. MarkaryanRussian Federation
Candidate of Sociology, Assistant Professor, Sociology Department, National Research University Higher School of Economics
References
1. Aleinikoff, Alexander T.; Klusmeyer, Douglas. Citizenship Policies for an Age of Migration. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2002.
2. Betz, Hans-Georg. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. New York: St. Martins Press, 1994.
3. Brubaker, Rogers. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
4. Data of French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies. Mode of access: http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/donneeslocales.asp?ref_id=etr2011&typgeo=CV&search=7599
5. Data of the Ministry of Interior of France. Mode of access: http://www.interieur.gouv.fr
6. Greenfeld, Liah. “Is Nation Unavoidable? Is Nation Unavoidable Today?” / In: Nations and National Identity,ed. H.P. Kriesi. Chur: Ruegger, 1998. Pp. 37-54.
7. Kitschelt, Herbert; McGann, Anthony J. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis, 1995.
8. Koopmans, Ruud. Explaining the Rise of Racist and Extreme Right Violence in Western Europe – Grievances or Opportunities // European Journal of Political Research, 1996, No.30(2), pp. 185-216.
9. Koopmans, Ruud; Statham, Paul. Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics: Comparative European Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
10. Markarian, A. Praktika kontrolia immigratsii vo Frantsii (Practice of Immigration Control in France) / Migratsionnye i integratsionnye praktiki. Sbornik instituta migratsionnoi politiki. RUSMPI, Vol. 3, 2015.
11. Nort, D. Instituty, institutsional’nye izmeneniia i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki (Institutes, Institutional Changes and Economic Performance) / Trasl. by A.N. Nesterenko; Ed. by B.Z. Mil’ner. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoi knigi “Nachala”, 1997.
12. Weldon, Steven. The Institutional Context of Tolerance for Ethnic Minorities: A Comparative, Multilevel Analysis of Western Europe // American Journal of Political Science, 2006, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 331-349.
13. World Bank Data 2013. Mode of access: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?order=wbapi_data_value_2013+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_valuelast&sort=desc
14. World Migration Report 2013 – Migrant Well-being and Development. Mode of access: http://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2013
Review
For citations:
Markaryan A.G. INSTITUTIONS, AGENTS AND PRACTICES OF IMMIGRATION CONTROL IN THE CONSOLIDATION OF SOCIETY: THE CASE OF FRANCE. Comparative Politics Russia. 2016;7(4(25)):62-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-4(25)-62-71