RUSSIA’S ‘FOREIGN AGENT’ LAW: A RESPONSE TO AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC PROMOTION POLICY

Recently passed the Russian ‘Foreign Agent’ law against foreign funding of NGOs and civil society has attracted criticism from almost every quarter. From home to abroad all party concerned (i.e., civil society organizations, NGO groups, donor countries (especiallyAmericaand European countries) as well as some Russian opposition political parties) are of the view that this bill has been introduced to scuttle the independent civic activities and in this way unconstitutional. However on the basis of overall analysis of ‘Foreign Agent’ law in the context of American democratic promotion policy this paper is of the view that this law simply cannot be characterized as anti-democratic, which is against the very basis of freedom and rule of law, by the anti-democratic Russian government but it should be seen as extension of same challenge which American democratic promotion policy is facing around the whole world. It is because of its illegal and unconstitutional method of regime change policy, with the help of foreign funded NGOs, and civil society which has compelled various countries includingRussiato resort this type of law. It is important to note that the promise of peace, stability and prosperity by the democratic promotion protagonists after the fall ofSoviet Unionhas not been realised till today. Instead what post-Soviet states are witnessing today is emergence of chauvinist nationalist government in respective countries which witnessed colour revolution. Whole region is now plunging into economic turmoil, ethnic nationalism, rise of religious fundamentalism and identity politics. Recent overthrow of legitimate Viktor Yanukovych government inUkraineand subsequent decision by incumbent government to exclude Russian as administrative language can be sited as example. That is why former American Republican Congressman Ron Paul is of the view that “US‘Democracy Promotion’ Destroys Democracy Overseas’’. In this context this paper will argue that democracy can only be beneficial when it evolved from within according to the aspiration of native masses and should not be imposed from outside with certain geopolitical interest in mind. Looking at the backlash against this policy this paper will further argue that the time has come when America should think of to review the policy of democratic promotion through foreign funding and simultaneously NGOs and civil societies should instead of fulfilling the agenda of their donor counties should work for making native people politically conscious and should not let the people make sceptic even of its guanine activity. 

1. Epstein Susan B., Nina M. Serafino, and Francis T. Miko Democracy Promotion: Cornerstone of U.S. Foreign Policy? 2007 // Mode of access: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34296.pdf

2. Ishkanian A. Democracy promotion and civil society, In Albrow, Martin and Glasius, Marlies and Anheier, Helmut K. and Kaldor, Mary, eds., Global Civil Society 2007/8 Communicative Power and Democracy, London, SAGE. Mode of access: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/37038/1/Democracy_promotion_and_civil_society_(lsero).pdf

3. Democracy promotion: America’s new regime change formula // Russia Today. 2010. 17 November. URL: http://russian.rt.com/

4. Zirulnick A. From Moscow to Cairo, a war on democracy promotion // The christen Science Monitor. 2013. 15 September.

5. Keck, Z. India Backs Russia’s ‘Legitimate Interests’ in Ukraine’, The Diplomat; Kasturi, Charu S. India bats for Russia interests // The Telegraph. 2014. Mode of access: http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140307/jsp/frontpage/story_18054272.jsp#.UzeQjvmSwS

6. Sleboda M. Is Russia’s ‘foreign agents’ law justified? Mode of access: http://us-russia.org/1317-isrussias-foreign-agents-law-justified.html (date of access: 12 February).

7. Bikhu P. The Cultural Particularity of Liberal Democracy // Political Studies. 1992. Vol. 40, Issue Supplement s1. P. 160–175.

8. Bouchet N. Sedaca N.B. Holding steady? US democracy promotion in a changing world. Americas PP 2014/01; Chatham House. Mode of access: http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/ chathamhouse/home/chatham/public_html/sites/ default/files/170214DemocracyPromotion.pdf

9. Burnell P. Does international democracy promotion work? Bonn: Dt. Inst. f r Entwicklungspolitik, 2007.

10. Nodia G. The Revenge of Geopolitics // Journal of Democracy. 2014. Vol. 25. P. 139–150.

11. The Crackdown on NGOs in Russia // Radio free Europe radio free liberty. Mode of access: http:// www.rferl.org/section/crackdown-on-ngos-inrussia/3272.html (date of access: 23 January, 2014).

12. Carothers T. The Clinton Record on Democracy Promotion // Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2000; Smith, America’s Mission; Sreeram C. Democratisation, NGOs and “colour revolutions” open democracy, 2006. Mode of access: https:// www.opendemocracy.net/globalizationinstitutions_ government/colour_revolutions_3196.jsp

13. Sussman G. The Myths of ‘Democracy Assistance’: U.S. Political Intervention in Post-Soviet East // Monthly review. Vol. 58, Issue 07. P. 15–29, 2006.

14. Ibid

15. Susman G. Karder S. Template revolutions: marketing US regime change in Eastern Europe // Westminister papers in communication and culture. Vol. 5(3). P. 91–112, 2008.

16. Derluguian G. The Color Revolutions Betrayed // PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 2010. No. 100.

17. Ioffe G. Geostrategic Interest and Democracy Promotion: Evidence from Post-Soviet Space // Europe-Asia Studies. 2013. Vol. 65, No. 7. P. 1255–1274.

18. The Crackdown on NGOs in Russia // Radio free Europe radio free liberty. Mode of access: http:// www.rferl.org/section/crackdown-on-ngos-inrussia/3272.html (date of access: 23 January, 2014).

19. 22 ‘Foreign Agents’ Detected in Russia after Mass Searches Prosecutor Says // Johnsan’s Russia list. 2013. 23 August. Mode of access: http://russialist. org/22-foreign-agents-detected-in-russia-aftermass-searches-prosecutor-says/

20. Russian Duma passes controversial NGO ‘foreign agent’ bill in landslide vote // Bellona. 2012. 13 July. Mode of access: http://bellona.org/news/russianhuman-rights-issues/russian-ngo-law/2012-07breaking-russian-duma-passes-controversial-ngoforeign-agent-bill-in-landslide-vote

21. Russia’s Ombudsman Files NGO ‘Foreign Agent’ Law Appeal — Report // RIA Novosti. 2013. 3 September.

22. Russian Duma passes controversial NGO ‘foreign agent’ bill in landslide vote // Bellona. 2012. 13 July. Mode of access: http://bellona.org/news/russianhuman-rights-issues/russian-ngo-law/2012-07breaking-russian-duma-passes-controversial-ngoforeign-agent-bill-in-landslide-vote

23. Lowenkron, Barry F. The Role of NGOs in the Development of Democracy // Scoop. 2006. 5 July. Mode of access: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/ WO0606/S00277.htm

24. Rodriguez A. Hobbled NGOs wary of Medvedev Watchdogs are civil lifeline in lawless Russia // Chicago tribune. 2008. 7 May. Mode of access: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2008-0507/news/0805060608_1_civil-society-russianauthorities-russian-president-vladimir-putin

25. Foreign agents law is here to stay — Putin // Russia Today. 2013. 4 July. Mode of access: http://russian. rt.com/

26. Putin’s promises to tone down ‘foreign agent’ NGO law gets mixed reception from rights leaders // Bellona. 2013. 5 July. Mode of access: http:// bellona.ru/bellona.org/articles/articles_2013/putin_back_off

27. Sleboda M. Russia must defend its civil society // The Voice of Russia. 2013. 7 June.

28. Petro N. Russian NGO Laws Reinforce Western Practices // OpEdNews. 2014. 17 January. Mode of access: http://www.opednews.com/articles/ Russian-NGO-Laws-Reinforce-by-Nicolai-PetroNGOs_Putin-140116-231.html

29. Chikov P. Russian NGOs: the funding realities // Open Democracy. 2013. 15 February. Mode of access: https://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/ pavel-chikov/russian-ngos-funding-realities

30. President Putin to put major amendments to “foreign agent status” bill // Russia Today. 2012. 10 July. Mode of access: http://russian.rt.com/

31. Wilson, Jeanne L. Coloured Revolutions: The View from Moscow and Beijing // Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 2009. Vol. 25. No. 2–3. P. 369–395.

32. Council of Europe: Russia’s Treatment of NGOs ‘Chilling // Voice of America. 2013. 11 April; NGO ‘Foreign Agents’ Law Comes into Force in Russia // RIA Novosti. 2012. 20 November; Elder M. and McGreal C. USAid ordered out of Moscow as Putin’s protest crackdown continues // The Guardian. 2012. 18 September.

33. Lowenkron, Barry F. The Role of NGOs in the Development of Democracy // Scoop. 2006. 5 July. Mode of access: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/ WO0606/S00277.htm

34. Bidder B. Putin vs. the NGOs: Kremlin Seeks to Brand Activists ‘Foreign Agents’. Spiegel online. Mode of access: http://www.spiegel.de/international/ world/russian-draft-law-seeks-to-label-ngos-andactivists-foreign-agents-a-842836.html

35. Ibid.

36. White S. Classifying Russia’s politics, in Stephen White, Richard Sakwa and Henry E. Hale ed. // Devlopment in Russian politics, London: Palgrave Macmilan, 2010.

37. Ibid.

38. Lowenkron, Barry F. The Role of NGOs in the Development of Democracy // Scoop. 2006. 5 July. Mode of access: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/ WO0606/S00277.htm

39. Zhirinovsky suggests closing all NGOs connected to abroad // Russia beyond the Headlines. 2013. 10 April.

40. LibDems: bill tagging NGO’s ‘foreign agents’ is reasonable // Russia Today. 2012. 5 July. Mode of access: http://russian.rt.com/

41. Lower House gives final approval to ‘foreign agents’ // Russia Today. 2012. 13 July. Mode of access: http://russian.rt.com/

42. Russian Lower House approves foreign agent status for NGOs // Russia Today. 2012. 6 July. Mode of access: http://russian.rt.com/

43. LibDems: bill tagging NGO’s ‘foreign agents’ is reasonable // Russia Today. 2012. 5 July. Mode of access: http://russian.rt.com/

44. Ibid.

45. Russia: Harsh Toll of ‘Foreign Agents’ Law // Human Rights Watch. 2013. 26 June. Mode of access: http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/06/25/ russia-harsh-toll-foreign-agents-law

46. Amnesty international. Russia: End ‘smear campaign’ against NGOs. 2012. 13 July. Mode of access: http://www.amnesty.org/en/for-media/ press-releases/russia-end-smear-campaign-againstngos-2012-07-13

47. Petro N. Russian NGO Laws Reinforce Western Practices // OpEdNews. 2014. 17 January. Mode of access: http://www.opednews.com/articles/ Russian-NGO-Laws-Reinforce-by-Nicolai-PetroNGOs_Putin-140116-231.htm

48. Foreign agents law is here to stay — Putin // Russia Today. 2013. 4 July. Mode of access: http://russian. rt.com/

49. Foreign Agents law demands financial control, not NGO closure — Putin in Hannover // Russia Today. 2013. 8 April. Mode of access: http://russian.rt.com/

50. Cartalucci T. Bombshell: US Caught Meddling in Russian Elections! // Global research. 2011. 6 December. Mode of access: http://www. globalresearch.ca/bombshell-us-caught-meddlingin-russian-elections/28060

51. Russian NGOs blast Putin’s estimate they have received nearly $1 billion in last four months // Bellona. 2013. 9 April. Mode of access: http:// bellona.org/news/russian-human-rights-issues/ russian-ngo-law/2013-04-russian-ngos-blastputins-estimate-they-have-received-nearly-1billion-in-last-four-months

52. Civil G20 — is a meeting for policy dialogue between the Political Leaders of G20 countries and representatives of civil society organizations working on the issues related to the agenda of G20 Summit. The goal of Civil G20 meeting is to facilitate exchange of ideas and opinions about the agenda of the G20 Summit and discuss pertinent issues which are of relevance to civil society with a view to making substantive contributions to policy formulation based on the civil society assessment of the main agenda and issues of the G20 Summit. URL: http://g8civil.org/g20civil-society

53. Role of NGOs discussed at world’s first G20 Civil Summit in Moscow // Bellona. 2013. 20 June. Mode of access: http://bellona.org/news/russian-humanrights-issues/russian-ngo-law/2013-06-role-of-ngosdiscussed-at-worlds-first-g20-civil-summit-in-moscow 54 Henderson S. Civil Society in Russia: State Society Relations in Post Yeltsin Era, 2011.

54. Dupuy K. James R. Aseem P. Foreign aid to local NGOs: good intentions, bad policy // Open Democracy. 2012. 15 November. Mode of access: https://www.opendemocracy.net/kendra-dupuyjames-ron-aseem-prakash/foreign-aid-to-localngos-good-intentions-bad-policy

55. Petro N. Russian NGO Laws Reinforce Western Practices // OpEdNews. 2014. 17 January. Mode of access: http://www.opednews.com/articles/ Russian-NGO-Laws-Reinforce-by-Nicolai-PetroNGOs_Putin-140116-231.html

56. Paul R. US ‘Democracy Promotion’ Destroys Democracy Overseas // Ron Paul institute for peace and prosperity. 23 March, 2014.