The India-China-USA Triangle in South Asia and Russia
https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-4-15-7
Abstract
The article examines the transformation of South Asia, highlighting the distinctive characteristics of the foreign policy strategies of major powers, the interplay between regionalization and globalization, and the prospects for either confrontation or interdependence among the region’s dominant states. South Asia is currently undergoing multifaceted and ambiguous repercussions of significant geopolitical shifts, underscoring the growing importance of analyzing the contemporary phase of interstate relations in this region. South Asia, in many ways, mirrors the broader global changes but on a smaller scale. The region comprises countries with stark disparities in territory, population, economic capacity, scientific and technological advancement, military power, as well as cultural and civilizational traits – all of which significantly shape interstate relations. India’s dominance within the region fosters distrust among its neighbors and exacerbates their perception of vulnerability. Consequently, these states increasingly seek to strengthen their positions in both regional and international arenas by leveraging relationships with extra-regional powers, most notably China. Moreover, unresolved disputes with India are frequently brought to the attention of the international community. The article also addresses the impact of external factors on South Asia’s international relations system, focusing on the substantial shifts in the strategies of major powers following the Cold War. It explores key issues such as the Indian-Chinese rivalry in the region, the United States’ adverse influence, and Russia’s policy toward South Asia.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. I. LunevRussian Federation
Dr. Sergey I. Lunev – Dr. of Science (History), Professor, MGIMO University; Principal Chief Research Fellow, Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
76 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
A. Yu. Davydenko
Russian Federation
Dr. Anatoly Yu. Davydenko – Assistant Professor, MGIMO University.
76 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Bajpai K., Huang J., Mahbubani K. (2016) China-India Relations. Routledge. 242 p.
2. Clary C., Lalwani S., Siddiqui N. (2021) Public Opinion and Crisis Behavior in a Nuclearized South Asia. International Studies Quarterly 65(4): 1064-1076. DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqab042.
3. Ezhegodnik SIPRI, 2014. (2015) Vooruzheniya, razoruzhenie i mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost’. Moscow: IMEMO RAS. (In Russian).
4. Galishсheva N.V., Reshсhikova M.S. (2021) Indijsko-kitajskie otnosheniya: bor`ba «Tigra» i «Drakona» za mesto pod solncem [Indian-Chinese relations: the struggle of the «Tiger» and the «Dragon» for a place in the sun]. Mezhdunarodnye processy [International Trends] 19(4): 104-122. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.4.67.5. (In Russian).
5. Galishсheva N.V., Reshсhikova M.S. (2023) Indiya i Kitaj v Yuzhnoj Azii: bor’ba za politicheskoe i ekonomicheskoe vliyanie v regione [India and China in South Asia: the struggle for political and economic influence in the region]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Oriental and African Studies] 15 (1): 133-154. DOI: 10.21638/spbu13.2023.109. (In Russian).
6. Gupta V. (1972) Anderson Papers. A Study of Nixon’s Blackmail of India. Delhi: Indian School Supply Depot, Publication Division. 236 p.
7. Khalilzad Z. (1989) The United States in South Asia. Current History 88(542): 417-420. DOI: 10.1525/curh.1989.88.542.417.
8. Kupriyanov A.V. (2023) Prisutstvie SShA i KNR v regione Indiiskogo okeana: vzgliad iz N’iu-Deli [The presence of the United States and China in the Indian Ocean region: a view from New Delhi]. SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul’tura [USA and Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture] 53(9): 32-45. DOI: 10.31857/S2686673023090031. (In Russian).
9. Kupriyanov A.V. (2020) Kitajskij faktor v formirovanii indijskogo podxoda k koncepcii indo-tihookeanskogo regiona [The Chinese factor in the formation of the Indian approach to the concept of the Indo-Pacific region]. Sravnitel’naia politika [Comparative Politics] 11(2): 68-75. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10020. (In Russian).
10. Lunev S.I. (2019a) Politika Kitaya v otnoshenii Yuzhnoj Azii i reakciya Indii [China’s policy towards South Asia and India’s reaction]. In: Voskressensky A.D. (ed.) Model’ razvitiya sovremennogo Kitaya: ocenki, diskussii, prognozy [The model of the development of modern China: assessments, discussions, forecasts]. Moscow: Strategicheskie izyskaniya. Pp. 463-486. (In Russian).
11. Lunev S.I. (2019b) Regionalizaciya i integraciya: Indiya i Yuzhnaya Aziya [Regionalization and integration: India and South Asia]. Moscow: Yurajt. 304 p. (In Russian).
12. Lunev S.I. (2020a) Problemy terrorizma i podkhody k Afganistanu v treugol’nike Rossiia-Indiia-Kitai [Problems of Terrorism and Approaches to Afghanistan in the Russia-India-China Triangle]. Sravnitel’naia politika [Comparative Politics] 11(2): 76-88. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10021. (In Russian).
13. Lunev S.I. (2020b) Rossiia i Indiia v Indo-Tikhookeanskom regione i faktor SShA [Russia and India in the Indo-Pacific region and the US factor]. Aktual’nye problemy Evropy [Current Problems of Europe] 1: 182-212. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2020.01.09. (In Russian).
14. Mazumdar A. (2014) Indian Foreign Policy in Transition: Relations with South Asia. London: Routledge. 244 p.
15. Mearsheimer J.J. (2021) The Inevitable Rivalry: America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics. Foreign Affairs 100(6): 48-58.
16. Mohan C. (2012) Samudra Manthan: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. 330 p.
17. Musharraf P. (2006) In the Line of Fire: A Memoir. N.Y.: Free Press. 368 p.
18. Shaumyan T.L. (2022) Indiia na global’nykh perekrestkakh [India at global crossroads]. Svobodnaia mysl’ [Free Thought] 2: 145-155. (In Russian).
19. Shavlaj E.P. (2020) Kitaiskii faktor v indiisko-amerikanskikh otnosheniiakh [The Chinese factor in Indian-American relations]. Sravnitel’naia politika [Comparative Politics] 11(2): 57-67. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10019. (In Russian).
20. Singh S. (2013) India in South Asia: Domestic identity politics and foreign policy from Nehru to the BJP. London: Routledge. 176 p.
21. Volodin A.G. (2016) Indiya i «strany Yuzhnyh morei»: geoekonomicheskie interesy i geopoliticheskie imperativy. [India and the «South Sea countries»: geo-economic interests and geopolitical imperatives]. Geopoliticheskij Zhurnal [The Geopolitical Journal] 4(16): 7-14. (In Russian).
22. Zamaraeva N.A. (2023) Kitaj vo vnutrennej i vneshnej politike Pakistana (2021-2022 gg.) [China in the domestic and foreign policy of Pakistan (2021-2022)], Kitaj v mirovoj i regional’noj politike. Istoriya i sovremennost’. Vypusk XXVIII : ezhegodnoe izdanie [China in world and regional politics. History and modernity. Issue XXVIII: Annual edition]. Moscow: IKSA RAS. Pp. 130-147. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Lunev S.I., Davydenko A.Yu. The India-China-USA Triangle in South Asia and Russia. Comparative Politics Russia. 2024;15(4):113-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-4-15-7