Europeanization of the Germany’s China Policy in Early 2020s: National Interests

The study aims to identify the significance of the European Union factor in shaping the foreign policy of the Federal Republic of Germany towards the People’s Republic of China in the early 2020’s. The research question stems from the existing contradiction between the economic interests of German states and business corporations on the one hand and the policy of the German government, which is increasingly distancing itself from China, on the other. It is hypothesized that Berlin’s shift to a confrontational strategy towards Beijing is largely due to “Europeanization” – the strengthening of centralization elements in European Union governance and the related adaptation of national models to the pan-European one. In the context of the “Europeanization” of foreign policy, supporting the existing trends rather than developing an alternative scenario contributes to preserving the leading role of Germany in the formation and implementation of the EU’s policy towards China. Thus, the study, in a certain sense, is a case study of the limits of autonomy of foreign policy of the integration associations’ member–states. Based on the bottom-up approach existing within the concept of “Europeanization,” the article provides a periodization of Germany’s policy towards China, taking into account the changes in the state of the EU ties with the latter. Four phases of German – Chinese engagements are proposed, namely 1993–2016, 2016–2019, 2019–2023 and 2023 until present. The comparison of the national and supranational levels of decision–making during these periods allowed us to demonstrate the full cycle of the “Europeanization” of Germany’s political course and once again emphasize the importance of the European Union in the formation of the policy of the state under study. Initially Germany presented its own norms of interaction with China to the EU level in order to ensure the most favorable conditions of cooperation with the latter; now it is adopting pan-European standards, adapting its national position to that of the European Union. The author’s conclusions are supported by the results of qualitative analysis of textual materials of the leading think–tanks in 2020–2024. The results of the study allow predicting further solidarization of Germany with the pan-European position and deterioration of German – Chinese relations.

1. Baur A. and Flach L. (2022) Deutsch-chinesische Handelsbeziehungen: Wie abhängig ist Deutschland vom Reich der Mitte? Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München 75(4): 56–65.

2. Belov V.B. (2023) O novoj strategii Germanii po otnosheniyu k Kitayu [Germany’s New Strategy In Relations With China]. Analiticheskie zapiski Instituta Evropy RAN [Analytical papers of the Institute of Europe RAS] (3). DOI: 10.15211/analytics31620231624. (In Russian).

3. Biba S. (2021) Germany’s relations with the United States and China from a strategic triangle perspective. International Affairs 97(6): 1905–1924. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiab170.

4. Bulmer S. (2007) Theorizing Europeanization. In: Graziano P. and Vink M. (eds.) Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 46–58.

5. Butorina O.V. (2023) Torgovlya Evrosoyuza s Kitaem: problema deficita [EU Trade with China: the Problem of Scarcity]. Sovremennaya Evropa [Contemporary Europe] (7): 5–20. DOI: 10.31857/S020170832307001X. (In Russian).

6. Christiansen T. (2023). EU-China-Beziehungen. In: Weidenfeld W., Wessels W. and Tekin F. (eds.) Europa von A bis Z. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp. 297–302. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-41005-6_42.

7. Cook R., Ohle M., Han Z. (2022) The Illusion of the China-US-Europe Strategic Triangle: Reactions from Germany and the UK. Journal of Chinese Political Science 27(3): 493–518. DOI: 10.1007/s11366-021-09771-2.

8. Coremenos B., Lipson Ch. (2001) The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55(4): 761–799. DOI: 10.1162/002081801317193592.

9. Corrocher N., Mavilia R., Giorgio M. (2018) The Sino-German Alliance for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Dynamics and Policy Implications. Journal of Economic Policy Reform 23(4): 426–446. DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2018.1547639.

10. Goetz K., Hix S. (eds.) (2000) Europeanised Politics? European Integration and National Political Systems. London: Routledge, 256 p.

11. Graziano P., Vink M. (2013) Europeanization: Concept, Theory, and Methods. In: Bulmer S. and Lesquene C. (eds.) The Member States of the European Union. Oxford Univeristy press, pp. 31–54.

12. Graziano P., Vink M. (eds.) (2007) Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 419 p.

13. Heiduk F. (2014) Conflicting Images? Germany and the Rise of China. German Politics 23(1–2): 118–133. DOI: 6.10.1080/09644008.2014.916693.

14. Hooijmaaijers B. (2021) Unpacking EU Policy-Making towards China. How Member States, Bureaucracies, and Institutions Shape its China Economic Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, 188 p.

15. Ladrech R. (1994) Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France. Journal of Common Market Studies 32(1): 69–88.

16. Langhammer R.J. (2022) Reluctant US vs ambitious German direct investment in China: The tale of two strategies. Kiel Policy Brief (162). Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/250308 (accessed 23 July 2024).

17. Moravcsik A. (1993) Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.

18. Olsen J.P. (2002) The Many Faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies 40(5): 921–52.

19. Pavlov N.V. (2023) Era Angely Merkel [Angela Merkel’s Era]. Moscow: Aspect Press, 431 p. (In Russian).

20. Radaelli C. (2000) Whither Europeanization? Concept Stretching and Substantive Change. European Integration online Papers 4(8). Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-008a.htm (accessed 23 July 2024).

21. Radaelli C. (2004) Europeanization: Solution or Problem? European Integration online Papers 8(4). Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-016a.htm (accessed 23 July 2024).

22. Risse T., Cowles M., Caporaso J. (2001) Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction. In: Cowles M., Caporaso J. and Risse T. (eds.) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–20.

23. Schimmelfennig F. (2010) Europeanisation Beyond the Member States. Journal for Comparative Government and European Policy 8(3): 319–339. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24237074 (accessed 23 July 2024).

24. Sterzhneva M.V. (2014) IIntegracionnye processy kak faktor politicheskih izmenenij v stranah Evrosoyuza [Integration processes as the factor of political changes in the EU countries]. In.: Globalnyj mir: k novym modelyam nacionalnogo i regionalnogo razvitiya [The Global World: to the new models of national and regional development]. Vol. 1. Moscow: IMEMO RAS: 89–108. (In Russian).

25. Timofeev O.A., Ronzhina V.S. (2017) Sopryazhenie programm «Sdelano v Kitae – 2025» i Industrie 4.0 kak osnova innovacionnogo sotrudnichestva KNR i Germanii [Pairing the Made in China 2025 and Industrie 4.0 programs as a basis for innovation cooperation between China and Germany]. Kitaj v mirovoj i regionalnoj politike. Istoriya i sovremennost [China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity] (22): 338–351. (In Russian).

26. Tsvyk A.V. (2016) Kitajskij vektor politiki FRG posle 1998 g. [The «Special» Relationship Between Germany and China in the Context of Germany’s China Policy]. Vestnik MGIMOUniversiteta [MGIMO Review of International Relations] 2(47): 338–351. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2016-2-47-161-167. (In Russian).

27. Tsvyk A.V. (2019) Strategicheskoe partnerstvo Germanii i Kitaya na sovremennom etape: Aktualnye problemy i novye vozmozhnosti [Strategic partnership of Germany and China today: Current problems and new opportunities]. Aktualnye problemy Evropy [Current problems of Europe] (4): 210–228. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2019.04.12. (In Russian).

28. Zaritskii B.E. (2021) Germaniya-Kitaj: partnery, konkurenty ili sistemnye soperniki? [Germany and China: Partners, Competitors or Systemic Rivals?]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations] 65(2): 16–28. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-2-16-28. (In Russian).