Preview

Comparative Politics Russia

Advanced search

Why Does Not the U.S. Attack China? The Fog of the Future and Historic Optimism in Policies of Great Powers

https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-1-15-62-94

Abstract

The rise of China constitutes a challenge for the U.S. hegemonic aspirations. However, Washington reacts to it rather belatedly and with restrain. Up until the mid-2020s, the United States did not consider the preventive use of force as a means to deter its competitor. On the contrary, it maintained intensive economic ties with China, contributing to its further strengthening. The article argues that the U.S. policy towards China reflects the optimism within the U.S. leadership regarding the long-term preservation of the foundations of its international standing. In other words, the United States does not perceive itself a declining power; rather, it believes that China will not be able to compete with it in the forceable future. In this regard, the U.S. has pursued primarily a delaying strategy, combining restrained pressure with unwillingness to either escalate or make significant concessions. The U.S. optimism proceeds from the prevailing uncertainty in international relations about the relative balance of power among great powers and the unclear prospects of future shifts in national capabilities. Under these conditions, Washington relies on ideological convictions in the superiority of its political, economic and social model over its competitors and appeals to the past patterns of great power rivalry. This study covers the period from the late 2000s to the mid-2020s. The article begins with a theoretical justification of the origins of optimism of weakening powers. Then, it examines changes in balance of power between the U.S. and China based on traditional indicators of national capabilities. Following this, the article explores the arguments against the U.S. decline and summarizes official assessments of threats to U.S. global standing. Finally, it traces the comparative roles of accommodation, coercion and restraint in the U.S. policy towards China. The analysis envisages an adjustment in the conceptual understanding of the dynamics of great power rivalry. It demonstrates that the lack of reliable information does not necessarily lead to intensifications of rivalries (as suggested by the “security dilemma”), but can also limit confrontation.

About the Author

I. A. Istomin
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Dr. Igor A. Istomin – Associate Professor, Head, Department of Applied International Political Analysis, MGIMO University

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Allison G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

2. Amiti M., Kong S. H., Weinstein D. (2021). Trade Protection, Stock-Market Returns, and Welfare. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w28758 (accessed 15 May 2024).

3. Batyuk V.I. (2019). Amerikano-kitajskie otnosheniya: vozvraschenie kholodnoj vojny? [U.S.China relations: return to the Cold War?] SSHA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kultura [USA and Canada: economy, politics, culture] 49 (5): 22–38. (In Russian).

4. Batyuk V.I. (2023). Podkhody SSHA k sderzhivaniyu Rossii i Kitaya (po materialam dokumentov strategicheskogo planirovaniya administratsii Dzh. Bajdena) [U.S. approaches to deter Russia and China (based on the strategic planning documents of the administration of J. Biden]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 25. International relations and world politics] 15 (2): 153–183. (In Russian).

5. Beckley M.C. (2011). China’s Century? Why America’s Edge Will Endure. International security 36 (3): 41-78.

6. Beckley M.C. (2018). Unrivaled: Why America Will Remain the World’s Sole Superpower. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

7. Beckley M.C. (2020). China’s Economy Is Not Overtaking America’s. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 32 (2): 10-23.

8. Beckley M.C. (2023). The Peril of Peaking Powers: Economic Slowdowns and Implications for China’s Next Decade. International Security 48 (1): 7-46.

9. Bogaturov A.D. (2006). Liderstvo i detsentralizatsiya v mezhdunarodnoj sisteme [Leadership and decentralization in international system]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International trends] 4 (3): 5–15. (In Russian).

10. Brooks S.G., Wohlforth W.C. (2016a). America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

11. Brooks S.G., Wohlforth W.C. (2016b). The Once and Future Superpower: Why China Won’t Overtake the United States. Foreign Affairs 95 (3): 91-104.

12. Brooks S.G., Wohlforth W.C. (2016c). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twentyfirst Century: China’s Rise and the Fate of America’s Global Position. International Security 40 (3): 7-53.

13. Brooks S.G., Wohlforth W.C. (2023). The Myth of Multipolarity: American Power’s Staying Power. Foreign Affairs 102 (3): 76-92.

14. Bychkova T.A. (2014). Kitajskaya politika administratsii Baraka Obamy v 2009–2012 gg. [Chinese policy of the administration of Barack Obama in 2009 – 2012] Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Tomsk state university] 388: 106–113. (In Russian).

15. Chang G.G. (2002). The Coming Collapse of China. N.Y.: Random House.

16. Chen S., Qiao X., Zhu Z. (2021). Chasing Or Cheating? Theory and Evidence on China’s GDP Manipulation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 189: 657-671.

17. Chen W., Chen X., Hsieh C.T., Song Z. (2019). A Forensic Examination of China’s National Accounts. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w25754/w25754.pdf (accessed 15 May 2024).

18. Cohen W.I. (2019). America’s Response to China: A History of Sino-American Relations. N.Y.: Columbia University Press.

19. Copeland D.C. (2001). The Origins of Major War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

20. Copeland D.C. (2015). Economic Interdependence and War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

21. Cramer J.K., Thrall A.T. (2009). Introduction: Understanding Threat Inflation. In: T. Thrall, J.K. Cramer (eds) American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear. Oxon Routledge: 19-33.

22. Davydova Yu.A., Kokoulina O.P., Denisenkova N.N. (2019). Vneshnyaya politika SSHA v nachale XXI veka: otnosheniya s Kitaem [U.S. foreign policy in the early 21st century: relations with China] Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: istoriya i politicheskie nauki [Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: history and political sciences] 2: 95–102.

23. Doshi R. (2021). The Long Game: China’s Grand Strategy to Displace American Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24. Ferguson N., Schularick M. (2007). ‘Chimerica’ and the Global Asset Market Boom. International Finance 10 (3): 215-239.

25. Fravel M.T., Gillboy G.J., Heginbotham E. (2024). Estimating China’s Defense Spending: How to Get It Wrong (and Right). Texas National Security Review 7 (3): Available at: https://tnsr.org/2024/06/estimating-chinas-defense-spending-how-to-get-it-wrong-andright/ (accessed 25 June 2024).

26. Gilli A., Gilli M. (2018). Why China Has Not Caught Up Yet: Military-Technological Superiority and the Limits of Imitation, Reverse Engineering, and Cyber Espionage. International Security 43 (3): 141-189.

27. Gilpin R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28. Istomin I.A. (2018). Logika povedeniya gosudarstv v mezhdunarodnoj politike [Logic of state behavior in international politics]. Moscow: Aspekt press. (In Russian).

29. Itzkowitz-Shifrinson J.R. (2018). Rising Titans, Failing Giants. How Great Powers Exploit Power Shifts. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

30. Jacques M. (2012). When China Rules the World: The Rise of the Middle Kingdom and the End of the Western World. N.Y.: Penguin UK.

31. Jervis R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

32. Jervis R. (2009). Understanding Beliefs and Threat Inflation. In: T. Thrall, J.K. Cramer (eds) American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear. Oxon: Routledge: 34-57.

33. Karaganov S.A. (2019). Ukhod voennogo prevoskhodstva Zapada i geoekonomika [Departure of the military primacy of the West and geoeconomics]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political studies] 6: 8–21. (In Russian).

34. Kennedy P. (1989). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. N.Y.: Vintage Books.

35. Khrustalev M.A. (2008). Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsij i politicheskaya ekspertiza [Analysis of international situations and political expertise]. Moscow: NOFMO. (In Russian).

36. Layne C. (2018). The US–Chinese Power Shift and the End of the Pax Americana. International Affairs. 94 (1): 89-111.

37. Leksyutina Ya.V. (2011). Kitajskij vector vneshnej politiki B. Obamy: preemstvennost’ i innovtsii [Chinese vector of foreign policy of Barack Obama: continuity and innovation]. Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS [Political Expertise: POLITEKS] 7 (1): 222–236. (In Russian).

38. Leksyutina Ya.V. (2012). Nyansy politiki administratsii B. Obamy v Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskom regione i interesy Kitaya [Specifics of the policy of Barack Obama’s administration in Asia Pacific region and interests of China]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. International relations] 3: 103–109. (In Russian).

39. Leksyutina Ya.V. (2018). Kitaj kak otevetstvennaya velikaya derzhava [China as a responsible great power]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International trends] 16 (2): 60–72. (In Russian).

40. Leksyutina Ya.V. (2019). Rol Kitaya v strategii “Svobodnyj i otkrytyj region” D. Trumpa [Role of China in Donald Trump’s “Free and open Indo-Pacific region”]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of Russian People’s Friendship University. Series: International relations] 19(1): 22–34. (In Russian).

41. Leksyutina Ya.V. (2020). Amerikano-kitajskie otnosheniya v 2018-2019 gg.: torgovaya vojna i protsess dekapinga [U.S.-China relations in 2018–2019: trade war and the process of decoupling]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations] 64 (6): 85–93. (In Russian).

42. MacDonald P.K., Parent J.M. (2011). Graceful Decline? The Surprising Success of Great Power Retrenchment. International Security 35 (4): 7-44.

43. MacDonald P.K., Parent J.M. (2018). Twilight of the Titans: Great Power Decline and Retrenchment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

44. Mahbubani K. (2009). The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East. N.Y.: PublicAffairs.

45. Martinez L.R. (2022). How Much Should We Trust the Dictator’s GDP Growth Estimates? Journal of Political Economy 130 (10): 2731-2769.

46. Mearsheimer J.J. (2006). China’s Unpeaceful Rise. Current History 105 (690): 160-162.

47. Mearsheimer J.J. (2018). The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

48. Neustadt R.E., May E. (1986). Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision Makers. N.Y.: Free Press.

49. Organski A.F., Kugler J. (1980). The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

50. Rosecrance R.N. (2014). Allies, Overbalance and War. In: R. Rosencrance, St. Miller (eds) The Next Great War? The Roots of World War I and the Risk of U.S.-China Conflict Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 45–56.

51. Safranchuk I.A., Lukyanov F.A. (2021). Sovremennyj mirovoj poryadok: strukturnye realii i sopernichestvo velikikh derzhav [Current world order: structural realities and competition of great powers]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political studies] 3: 57–76.(In Russian).

52. Schake K. (2017). Safe Passage. Boston: Harvard University Press.

53. Shakleina T.A. (2011). Velikie derzhavy i regionalnye podsistemy [Great powers and regional subsystems]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International Trends] 9 (2): 29–39. (In Russian).

54. Shakleina T.A. (2018). Kakaya Amerika nuzhna miru? [Which America does the world need?] Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International trends] 16 (1): 40–52. (In Russian).

55. Singer J.D. (1988). Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816–1985. International Interactions 14 (2): 115-132.

56. Snyder J. (2009). Imperial Myths and Threat Inflation. In: T. Thrall, J.K. Cramer (eds) American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear. Oxon: Routledge: 58-71.

57. Starbuck W.H., Hedberg B. (2001). How Organizations Learn from Success and Failure. Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 327-350.

58. Tellis A.J. (2001). Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

59. Tetlock P.E. (2005). Expert Political Judgement: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

60. Thucydides (1999). Istoriya [History]. SPb.: Nauka. (In Russian).

61. Treisman D. (2004). Rational Appeasement. International Organization 58 (2): 345-373.

62. Van Evera S. (1999). Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

63. Walt S.M. (2018). The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of US Primacy. N.Y.: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

64. Wohlforth W.C. (1993). The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

65. Yoder B.K. (2019). Retrenchment as a Screening Mechanism: Power Shifts, Strategic Withdrawal, and Credible Signals. American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 130-145.

66. Zhou Q., Zeng J. (2018). Mayors’ Promotion Incentives and Subnational-level GDP Manipulation in China. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3269645 (accessed 15 May 2024).


Review

For citations:


Istomin I.A. Why Does Not the U.S. Attack China? The Fog of the Future and Historic Optimism in Policies of Great Powers. Comparative Politics Russia. 2024;15(1):62-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-1-15-62-94

Views: 659


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2221-3279 (Print)
ISSN 2412-4990 (Online)