"City upon a Hill" in the Face of Significant Challenges
https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-15-4-21
Abstract
The editor-in-chief proposes a context for examining the crisis processes in American society explored in the articles. The author suggests that this crisis should be viewed in the context of the American history cycles. Many of the current conflicts in the USA have a similar internal source, which is a sharp intra-elite conflict involving a significant part of society. This conflict is unusual in its depth, given that for many decades the «trademark» of the American political class has been its consensus character. One important element of this consensus can be seen as an unquestioned focus on global American leadership and a shared commitment among members of the community to the force imperatives in foreign policy – either the classic “hard” or “flexible” power. Among the sources of American foreign policy continuity are a number of factors. First, it is the stability of institutional mechanisms of decision-making, which, in turn, is based on a stable system of representation of dominant interests. Second, the stability of formal and informal institutions that ensure a high degree of elite cohesion; and the specificity of American political culture, which is based on a set of political and philosophical views of messianic nature. The consensual nature of the political elite was the system-forming basis of liberal democracy, so the breakdown of this consensus may entail – and partially has already entailed – a crisis of the US political system.
About the Author
O. V. Gaman-GolutvinaRussian Federation
Dr. Oksana V. Gaman-Golutvina – Corresponding Member, Russian Academy of Sciences; Head, Department of Comparative Politics, MGIMO University; President, Russian Association of Political Science; Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University); Editor-in-Chief, “Comparative Politics Russia” Journal; Member, Public Chamber of the Russian Federation and the Public Council under the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.
76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Almond G.A., Flanagan S.C., Mundt R.J. (Eds.) (1973) Crisis, Choice, and Change: Historical Studies of Political Development. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
2. Bacevich A.J. (2005) The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
3. Bacevich A.J. (2009) The Limits of Power. The End of American Exceptionalism. N.Y.: Henry Holt and Company.
4. Bacevich A.J. (2010) Washington Rules. America’s Path to Permanent War. N.Y.: Metropolitan Books.
5. Bacevich A.J. (2013) Breach of Trust. How Americans Failed Their Soldiers and Their Country. N.Y.: Metropolitan Book.
6. Batalov E.Ya. (2014) American Political Thought of the Twentieth Century [Amerikanskaya politicheskaya mysl’ 20 veka]. M.: Progress-Tradiciya. (In Russian).
7. Best H., Higley J. (Eds.) (2010) Democratic elitism: New theoretical and comparative perspectives. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
8. Best H., Higley J. (Eds.) (2014) Political Elites in the Transatlantic Crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Best H., Higley J. (Eds.) (2018) The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Dogan M., Higley J. (Eds.) (1998) Elites, Crises, and the Origins of Regimes. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
11. Domhoff W.G. (2006) Who Rules America: Power and Politics, 5th ed. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
12. Domhoff W.G. et al. (2018) Studying the Power Elite. Fifty Years of Who Rules America? N.Y.: Routledge.
13. Frolova O.A. (2015) The Structure of the American Political Elite as a Subject of World Politics in the Early XXI Century [Struktura amerikanskoj politicheskoj elity kak sub»ekta mirovoj politiki v nachale XXI veka]. PhD Dissertation. M.: RUDN University. (In Russian).
14. Gaman-Golutvina O. (2018) Political Elites in the USA under George W. Bush and Barack Obama: Structure and International Politics. Historical Social Research 43(4): 141-163. DOI: 10.12759/hsr.43.2018.4.141-163.
15. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2004) Parties and Power [Partii i Vlast’]. Free Thought [Svobodnaya Mysl’] (9): 77-86. (In Russian).
16. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2005) Development of the Category «Political Culture» in Socio-Political Thought [Razvitie kategorii «politicheskaya kul’tura» v obshchestvennopoliticheskoj mysli]. Political Expertise: POLITEX [Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS] 1(2): 38-49. (In Russian).
17. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2006) Political Elites in Russia: Milestones of Historical Evolution [Politicheskie elity Rossii: vekhi istoricheskoj evolyucii]. M.: ROSSPEN. (In Russian).
18. Harfst Ph., Kubbe I., Poguntke T. (eds.) (2007). Parties, Governments and Elites. The Comparative Study of Democracy. Wiesbaden: Springer.
19. Higley J. (2006) Democracy and Elites [Demokratiya i elity]. Polity [Politiya] 2(41). (In Russian).
20. Higley J. (2006) The Bush Elite: Aberration or Harbinger? In: The Rise of AntiAmericanism. Ed. Brendan O’Connor and Martin Griffiths: 155-168. London: Routledge.
21. Higley J. (2007) Democracy and Elites. Comparative Studies of Social and Political Elites. Comparative Social Research. Vol. 23.
22. Higley J. (2012) Revolutionary Elites [Revolyucionnye elity]. Comparative Politics Russia [Sravnitel’naya politika] 3(2): 4-29. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2012-3-2(8)-4-29. (In Russian).
23. Higley J. (2016) The Endangered West. Myopic Elites and Fragile Social Orders in a Threatening World. N.Y.: Routledge.
24. Higley J. (2023) Western Elites and Societies in Twenty-First Century Politics Avoiding Calamity. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-52307-6.
25. Higley J. (Ed.) (2000) Elites after State Socialism. Rowman & Littlefield.
26. Higley J., Burton M. (2006) Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracies. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
27. Higley J., Pakulski J. (2007) Elite and Leadership Change in Liberal Democracies. Comparative Sociology 6(1-2): 6-26.
28. Kissinger H. (1994) Diplomacy. N.Y.: Simon and Shuster.
29. Kissinger H. (2001) Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a Diplomacy for the 21st Century. N.Y.: Simon and Schuster.
30. Mills C. W. (1956) The Power Elite. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
31. Moore G., Mack S. (2007) From Vietnam to Iraq: American Elites’ Views on the Use of Military Force. Comparative Sociology 6(1-2): 215-31.
32. Nye J.S. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
33. Nye J.S. (2009) Get Smart. Combining Hard and Soft Power. Foreign Affairs 88 (4): 160-163.
34. Nye J.S. (2011) The Future of Power. N.Y.: Public Affairs.
35. Political Class in Modern Society [Politicheskij klass v sovremennom obshchestve] (2012) Ser. Library of the Russian Association of Political Science. M.: ROSSPEN. (In Russian).
36. Schlesinger A. (1992) Cycles of American History [Cikly amerikanskoj istorii]. M.: Progress. (In Russian).
37. Skocpol Th. (1979) States and Social Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
38. Tocqueville A. (1992) Democracy in America [Demokratiya v Amerike]. M.: ProgressTradiciya. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Gaman-Golutvina O.V. "City upon a Hill" in the Face of Significant Challenges. Comparative Politics Russia. 2024;15(1):4-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-15-4-21