Separatism in Belgium: Key Factors Governing Walloon-Flemish Discrepancies
https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2023-4-14-9-38
Abstract
The study is devoted to a retrospective analysis of separatism in Belgium and its development given the existing ethnic conflict between Flemish and Walloons. The research depicts the historical and contemporary dynamics of the problem. The aim of the study is to identify major factors that contributed to aggravation of the ethnic conflict and institutionalization of separatism, as well as influenced the further transformation of the separatist discourse in the country. To achieve this goal, the author uses an interdisciplinary approach with the use of historic, political science and economic categories and methods. The methodological basis of the work is formed by modern theoretical views on the types and causes of separatist sentiments, as well as options and strategies for dealing with the problem. The study relies on qualitative historical methods, it also uses statistical analysis, data from sociological surveys, and analyzes a wide range of documents, including the programs of political parties. One might argue that the evolution of ethnic separatism in Belgium was influenced by the following factors: linguistic division (as a fundamental precondition of the conflict), the factor of elites (which determined the main vector of the separatist discourse), the external factor (which contributed to the formation of Flemish separatism), the economic factor (which gave an impetus to the institutionalization of the country's division) and the ‘institutional’ factor itself. The latter is understood as the formation of ethnic groups in the country that are actually isolated from one another at the expense of the development of a full-fledged
system of regional and community institutions. This factor seems to be extremely important, as it contributed to the ‘freezing’ of the ethnic conflict and at the same time incorporated a large number of imbalances associated with ethnic division into the system of consociational democracy. As a result, the stabilization of the conflict was achieved at the expense of destabilizing the central government in the country. In the modern political system of Belgium, the separatist discourse is widely instrumentalized. The ideas of dividing the country and reforming the state structure are gradually losing their impetus due to the emergence of new problems (migration, economic crisis, anti-establishment sentiments) and changing priorities of the right- wing political forces.
About the Author
Egor A. Sergeev
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Egor A. Sergeev — Associate Professor, Department of World Economy, Associate Professor, Department of European and American Studies, Senior Research Fellow, Center for European Studies, Institute for International Studies, MGIMO University
References
1. Alen A. (1993) ‘Nationalism–Federalism–Democracy: The Example of Belgium’, European Review of Public Law, 5(1), pp. 41-88.
2. Billiet J., Maddens B., Frognier A.-P. (2006) ‘Does Belgium (still) exist? Differences in political culture between Flemings and Walloons’, West European Politics, 29 (5), pp. 912-932.
3. Caluwaerts D., Reuchamps, M. (2015) ‘Combining Federalism with Consociationalism: Is Belgian Consociational Federalism Digging its Own Grave?’, Ethnopolitics, 14(3), pp. 277-295.
4. Caluwaerts, D., Reuchamps, M. (eds.). (2022) Belgian Exeptionalism: Belgian Politics Between Realism and Surrealism. Routledge, 2022.
5. Cook B. A. (2002) Belgium: A History, Peter Lang.
6. Covell M. (1981) ‘Ethnic conflict and elite bargaining: The case of Belgium’, West European Politics, 4(3), pp. 197–218.
7. Dandoy R., Sinardet D. (2021) ‘The separatism debate in Flanders: Actors and Arguments’, In A. Eppler, C. Jeffery (eds.) Qualified Autonomy and Federalism versus Secession in EU Member States. Innsbruck: Lütgenau, pp. 187-201.
8. Erk J., Anderson L. M. (eds.). (2010) The paradox of federalism: Does self-rule accommodate or exacerbate ethnic divisions? Routledge, 2010.
9. Godefroid K. (1895) La frontière linguistique en Belgique et dans le nord de la France. In: Mémoires couronnés et autres mémoires publiés par l'Académie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique. Collection in-8°. Tome 48, 1895.
10. Heraclides, A. (2002). ‘Partition, Autonomy, Secession : The Three Roads of Separatism’, Cahiers d'Études sur la Méditerranée Orientale et le monde Turco-Iranien, 34, pp. 149-174.
11. Hooghe, L. (1993) Belgium from Regionalism to Federalism. Political Economy Research Group. Papers in Political Economy, 43. London.
12. Jennes G. (2014) ‘Has Belgian Fiscal Decentralisation Reduced the Size of Government and Budget Deficit?’, Working Papers of VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics, Leuven.
13. Keating M. (2007) Federalism and the Balance of Power in the European States. OECD. Available at: https://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/37890628.pdf
14. Lijphart A. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies, New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Medeiros M. (2017) ‘The Language of Conflict’, Ethnicities, 17(5), pp. 627-645.
16. Mnookin R.H. (2007) ‘Ethnic Conflicts: Flemings & Walloons, Palestinians & Israelis’, Daedalus, 136(1), pp. 103-119.
17. Nouwen R. (2020) ‘De Romeinse weg Tongeren-Maastricht ter hoogte van Blaar’, Tongerse Annalen, 2020-2, pp. 4-11.
18. Popelier P. (2020) ‘How dynamic federalism sheds new light on the Belgian federalism-confederalism debate’, Fédéralisme Régionalisme, 20. Available at: https://popups.uliege.be/1374-3864/index.php?id=2041
19. Sinardet D. (2013) ‘How Linguistically Divided Media Represent Linguistically Divisive Issues. Belgian TV-Debates on Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde’, Regional & Federal Studies, 23(3), pp. 311–330.
20. Van Havere, T., Wils, K., Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L. (2017) ‘Flemish students’ historical reference knowledge and narratives of the Belgian national past at the end of secondary education’, London Review of Education, 15(2), pp. 272-285. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.2.10
21. Van Leeuwen M., Maas I., Hin S., Matthijs K. (2019) ‘Socio-economic modernization and enduring language barriers: choosing a marriage partner in Flemish communities, 1821-1913’, The History of the Family, 24(1): A historical community approach to social homogamy in the past, pp. 94-122.
22. van Velthoven P. (2012). Franstaligen tegen Vlamingen: hor België als natie mislukte. Soesterberg, Uitgeverij Aspekt.
23. Vandenberghe M. (2022) ‘Power-Sharing and the Paradox of Federalism: Federalization and the Evolution of Ethno- Territorial Conflict in the Case of Belgium (1979–2018)’, Ethnopolitics, 22(5), pp. 485-506.
24. Verbeke A.-L., Euwema M. (2010) ‘Negative and Positive Roles of Media in the Belgian Conflict: A Model for De-Escalation, Marquette Law Review, pp. 139-171.
25. Vos L. (1998) ‘Nationalism, Democracy and the Belgian State’, Tijdschrift over de geschiedenis van de Vlaamse beweging, 57(2), pp.103-106.
26. Xhardez C. (2020) ‘Divided Belgium: Flemish nationalism and the rise of pro-separatist politics’, In C. Kostov (ed.) Separatism and Regionalism in Modern Europe. Berlin: Logos Verlag, pp. 33-157.
27. ван Истендал Г. (2021) Бельгийский лабиринт, пер. с нидерл. В.В. Ошиса. М.: Изд-во «Весь мир».
28. Нарочницкая Е.А. (2015) Многообразный сепаратизм: Проблема типологии и европейской реальности, Актуальные проблемы Европы, 6, С. 32-55.
29. Осколков П.В. (2017) Правый популизм в странах Бенилюкс в сравнительной перспективе, Современная Европа, 2017, № 5, С. 54-62.
30. Осколков П.В., Тэвдой-Бурмули А.И. (2023) К вопросу о дискурсивных параметрах типологизации политических партий, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 67 (5), С. 57-68. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-5-57-68
31. Осколков П.В. (2021) Этнорегиональный сепаратизм в Европе: дезинтеграция против интеграции?, Международная аналитика, 12 (3), С. 59–71. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-3-59-71.
32. Пиренн А. (2001) Средневековые города Бельгии. СПб.: Евразия.
33. Прохоренко И.Л. (2018) Европейская интеграция и проблема сепаратизма в государствах-членах Европейского союза. М.: ИМЭМО РАН.
34. Туров Н.Л. (2021) Феномен сепаратизма в современном мире. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2021.
Review
For citations:
Sergeev E.A. Separatism in Belgium: Key Factors Governing Walloon-Flemish Discrepancies. Comparative Politics Russia. 2023;14(4):9-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2023-4-14-9-38
Views:
629
Email this article 