Polish Authoritarian Turn of "Law and Justice": Essential and Ideological Foundations and Consequences

The article examines the foundational principles of the Law and Justice (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, PiS) party, focusing on its authoritarian-populist stance, ideological roots, and policy objectives. It delves into the repercussions of PiS's anti-democratic measures, particularly in the arear of the Constitutional Court, human rights, and protection of human rights, and control over media outlets and news agencies. These actions have led to visible and anticipated outcomes, sparking widespread criticism both domestically, from Polish opposition groups and activists, and internationally, from foreign politicians and organizations. The article aims to provide a thorough description and examination of the ongoing political dynamics within the country, specifically the authoritarian trends stemming from PiS's nationalist-imbued populism being elevated to the status of the state's governing ideology. The study segments the political landscape into three distinct categories: the underlying factors driving PiS's authoritarian trajectory rooted in its overarching authoritarian-populist worldview, the attitudes, imperatives, and strategies shaping PiS's policy responses and problem-solving approaches, and the political shifts observed as a consequence of these dynamics.

1. Babińska M., Bilewicz M., Bulska D., et al. (2018). Stosunek do Żydów i ich historii po wprowadzeniu ustawy o IPN. Warszawa: Centrum Badan nad Uprzedzeniami. (In Polish).

2. Benedikter R., Karolewski I. (2016). Poland's conservative turn of 2015: Where are its real origins? CIFE Policy Paper (35): 81-88.

3. Bodnar A. (2018). Protection of Human Rights after the Constitutional Crisis in Poland. Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart (66): 639-662.

4. Cooley A. (2016). Countering Democratic Norms. In: Authoritarianism Goes Global: The Challenge to Democracy. L. Diamond, M. Plattner, Ch. Walker (eds.). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

5. Drozdowicz J. (2019). Splendid Isolation. Reframing National Identity Through Political Populism in Poland. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law (11): 85-110.

6. Gdula M. (2017). Dobra zmiana w miastku. Neoautorytaryzm w polskiej polityce z perspektywy małego miasta. Warszawa: Instytut Studiow Zaawansowanych Press. (In Polish).

7. Karnowska, D. (2011). Spór o wspólnoty. Idee komunitarystyczne we współczesnej polskiej myśli politycznej. Toruñ: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszaek. (In Polish).

8. Karolewski I. (2016). Protest and participation in post-transformation Poland: The case of the Committee for the Defense of Democracy (KOD). Communist and Post-Communist Studies 49(3): 255-267.

9. Karolewski I. (2019). Memory games and populism in postcommunist Poland. In: European Memory in Populism. Ch. Cesari, A. Kaya (eds.). London: Taylor and Francis Publishing.

10. Kelemen D. (2007). Europe’s other democratic deficit: National authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union. Government and Opposition 52(2): 211-238.

11. Koncewicz T. (2017). On the Politics of Resentment, Mis-memory, and Constitutional Fidelity: The Demise of the Polish Overlapping Consensus? In: Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. U. Belavusau, A. Gliszczynska-Grabias (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12. Korycki K. (2017). Memory, Party Politics, and Post-Transition Space: The Case of Poland. East European Politics & Societies 31(3): 518-544.

13. Kowalczyk K. (2004). Prawo i Sprawiedliwooeæ. In: Polskie partie i ugrupowania parlamentarne. K. Kowalczyk, J. Sielski (eds.). Toruñ: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek. (In Polish).

14. Kowalczyk K. (2014). Typologia polskich partii politycznych według kryterium programowego. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne (1): 73-99. (In Polish).

15. Lasoñ, M. (2011). Eurosceptycyzm jako przejaw populizmu w praktyce politycznej III RP. Krakowskie Studia Miêdzynarodowe 8(4): 187-201. (In Polish).

16. Markowski R. (2020). Plurality support for democratic decay: the 2019 Polish parliamentary election. West European Politics 43(13): 1513-1525.

17. Modrzejewski A. (2017). Catholic and Nationalist Populism in the Current Poland. Perspective Politice 10(1): 21-31.

18. Müller J. (2017). Populism and Constitutionalism. In: The Oxford Handbook of Populism. C.R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa-Espejo (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

19. Ost D. (2018) Authoritarian Drive in Poland. Poland's Memory Wars: Essays on Liberalism. J. Harper (ed.). Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 55-64.

20. Paczeoeniak, A., De Waele J. (2010). Europa z rys populizmu. In: Populizm w Europie. Defekt i przejaw demokracji? J-M. De Waele, A. Paczeoeniak (eds). Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa. (In Polish).

21. Pelinka A. (2013). Right-Wing Populism: Concept and Typology. In: Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. R. Wodak, M. Khosravinik, B. Mral (eds.). London: Bloomsbury.

22. Roguska B. (2016). Aktywność społeczno--polityczna Polaków. Komunikat z Badań (16): 1-17. (In Polish).

23. Sadurski W. (2014). Rights before Courts: a study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe. Dordrecht: Springer. 376 p.

24. Sadurski W. (2018). How Democracy Dies (in Poland): A Case Study of Anti-Constitutional Populist Backsliding. Sydney: Legal Studies Research Paper 18(1): 1-72.

25. Sadurski W. (2019). Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11: 63-84.

26. Sadurski W. (2020). Populism and Human Rights in Poland. In: Human Rights in a Time of Populism. G. Neuman (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

27. Tworzecki H. (2019). Poland: A Case of Top-Down Polarization. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681(1): 97-119.

28. Weyland K. (2017). Populism: A Political–Strategic Approach. In: The Oxford Handbook of Populism. C.R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa-Espejo (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.