Public Diplomacy Potential of the Border Regions to Reduce the Socio-Cultural Threats of the Western Borderlands of Russia
https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2023-1-2-14-39-56
Abstract
The article discusses the public diplomacy potential to reduce the socio-cultural threats of the border regions located on the western borders of Russia. The key problem in the context of the deep transformation of the post-Soviet socio-cultural landscape is that at the level of cross-border interaction, public diplomacy acquires a special meaning and significant potential. The socio-cultural proximity of local and ethnic communities of the border region significantly increases the opportunities for public diplomacy in the format of cultural exchange. Acting as a tool for achieving the global goals of the state’s foreign policy, public diplomacy can be used in the practice of resolving international conflicts and threats. For the first time, the results of sociological diagnostics of the readiness of the border territories population to participate in the implementation of public diplomacy projects, awareness of the forms of public diplomacy and the possibilities of participation in such projects and major international programs implemented in the regions, as well as the effectiveness of non-profit organizations of border regions implementing projects in the field of public diplomacy are presented. The article explores the specification of the directions and forms of public diplomacy at the regional level in the cross-border interaction of the Eurasian Union, the importance of the development of twinning relations for border cities is noted, the importance of the practice of public diplomacy, both at the level of non-profit organizations and in the form of cross-border communication of the population to reduce various socio-cultural threats inherent in the border area is emphasized. The close attention is paid to the interaction of cultures and ethnic groups of border regions, once unified ethno-cultural communities separated by state borders. The authors touch upon the socio-cultural threats of the frontier space – an invisible spatial area within which the common ethno-cultural identity of the population extends beyond the state borders. In the final part of the article the conclusions are presented on the main results and recommendations that will not only increase the effectiveness of public diplomacy projects in the border regions, but also concentrate the activities of its main actors on reducing socio-cultural threats characteristic of the western borderlands of Russia.
About the Authors
V. A. Sapryka
Belgorod State National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Viktor A. Sapryka — Associate Professor, Head, Department of Social Technologies and Public Service, Belgorod State National Research University
A. V. Pastyuk
Belgorod State National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Alexander V. Pastyuk — Senior Lecturer, Department of Social Technologies and Public Service, Belgorod State National Research University
V. V. Solokha
Belgorod State National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery V. Solokha — Postgraduate Student, Department of Social Technologies and Public Service, Belgorod State National Research University
References
1. Babincev V.P., Sapryka V.A., Byhtin O.V., Pastjuk A.V. (2017) Interakcija kul'turno-civilizacionnyh identichnostej naselenija prigranichnyh regionov Rossii i Ukrainy [Interaction of cultural and civilizational identities of the population of the border regions of Russia and Ukraine]. Vestnik slavjanskih kul'tur [Bulletin of Slavic Cultures] 43: 9-23. (In Russian).
2. Babincev V.P., Ushamirskaja G.F., Babinceva E.I. (2016) Rossijsko-ukrainskoe prigranich'e kak prostranstvo formirovanija novyh identichnostej [Russian-Ukrainian borderland as a space for the formation of new identities]. Srednie i malye goroda prigranichnyh regionov [Medium and small towns in border regions]. Ed. by V.P. Babincev. Belgorod: NIU «BelGU». P. 27-51. (In Russian).
3. Bahriev B.H. (2018) Publichnaja diplomatija v uregulirovanii konfliktov: vozmozhnosti dlja Central'noj Azii [Public Diplomacy in Conflict Resolution: Opportunities for Central Asia]. Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaja serija. Serija Sociologija. Politologija [Izvestia of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology] 18(2): 189-194. (In Russian).
4. Lebedeva M.M. (2015a) Vozmozhnosti i ogranichenija publichnoj diplomatii v uregulirovanii konfliktov [Opportunities and limitations of public diplomacy in conflict resolution]. Problemy nacional'noj bezopasnosti v uslovijah globalizacii integracionnyh processov (mezhdisciplinarnye aspekty) [Problems of national security in the context of globalization of integration processes (interdisciplinary aspects)]. Erevan: Rossijsko-Armjanskij (Slavjanskij) universitet. P. 212-216. (In Russian).
5. Lebedeva M.M. (2015b) Publichnaja diplomatija v uregulirovanii konfliktov [Public diplomacy in conflict resolution]. Mezhdunarodnye processy [International processes] 13(4): 45-56. (In Russian).
6. Mezhevich N.M., Bolotov D.A. (2021) Dvojnaja periferija: fenomen rossijsko-belorusskogo pogranich'ja [Double periphery: the phenomenon of the Russian-Belarusian borderland]. Jekonomika Severo-Zapada: problemy i perspektivy razvitija [Economy of the North-West: problems and development prospects] 1: 117-122. (In Russian).
7. Mikitchuk V.P. (2021) Investicii v obshhestvennyj sektor kak vozmozhnost' privlechenija finansirovanija na realizaciju social'nyh proektov v regionah i municipalitetah [Investments in the public sector as an opportunity to attract financing for the implementation of social projects in regions and municipalities]. Aziatsko-tihookeanskij region: jekonomika, politika, pravo [Asia-Pacific region: economics, politics, law] 2: 31-41. (In Russian).
8. Muhametov R.S. (2013) Obshhestvennaja diplomatija: sushhnost', aktory i metody raboty [Public diplomacy: essence, actors and methods of work]. Razvitie politicheskih institutov processov i tehnologij: otechestvennyj i zarubezhnyj opyt [Development of political institutions of processes and technologies: domestic and foreign experience]. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGU. P. 99-103. (In Russian).
9. Public diplomacy: Theory and practice: Scientific publication (2017). Ed. by M.M. Lebedeva. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt Press». 272 p. (In Russian).
10. Sapryka V.A., Babincev V.P., Vavilov A.N. (2019) Rossija i Ukraina: protivorechija postsovetskogo prigranichnogo hronotopa [Russia and Ukraine: contradictions of the post-Soviet border chronotope]. Vestnik Rossijskoj nacii [Bulletin of the Russian Nation] 3(67): 59-69. (In Russian).
11. Sivakova S.Ju., Nozdreva I.E. (2016) Razvitie jekonomiki regiona na osnove klasternogo podhoda [Development of the regional economy based on the cluster approach]. Naukovedenie [Scientific studies] 8(1): 1-16. (In Russian).
12. Torkunov A.V. (2006) Nauka o razumnyh otnoshenijah [The Science of Reasonable Relations]. Strategija Rossii [Russian strategy] 3: 49-50. (In Russian).
13. Shlapeko E.A. (2017) Institut obshhestvennoj diplomatii i ego mesto v transgranichnom sociokul'turnom prostranstve [The Institute of public diplomacy and its place in the cross-border sociocultural space]. Ojkumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovanija [Ecumene. Regional studies] 1(40): 152-162. (In Russian).
14. Shlapeko E.A. (2018) Problematika formirovanija transgranichnogo sociokul'turnogo prostranstva v rossijsko-finljandskom prigranich'e [Problems of formation of trans-border socio-cultural space in the Russian-Finnish borderland]. Strategija razvitija prigranichnyh territorij: tradicii i innovacii [Development strategy for border areas: traditions and innovations]. Kursk: Kurskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. P. 257-262. (In Russian).
15. Cull N. (2009) Public Diplomacy Before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. Ed. by N. Snow and Ph.M. Taylor. New York: Routledge. P. 19-23.
16. Darnton C. (2020) Public Diplomacy and International Conflict Resolution: A Cautionary Case from Cold War South America. Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 1-20.
17. Nye J. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. 208 p.
18. Princen T., Finger M. (1994) Environmental NGOs in World Politics: Linking the Local and the Global. New York: Routledge. 198 p.
19. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (2009). Ed. by N. Snow and Ph.M. Taylor. New York: Routletge. 486 p.
Review
For citations:
Sapryka V.A., Pastyuk A.V., Solokha V.V. Public Diplomacy Potential of the Border Regions to Reduce the Socio-Cultural Threats of the Western Borderlands of Russia. Comparative Politics Russia. 2023;14(1-2):39-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2023-1-2-14-39-56
Views:
254
Email this article 