Preview

Comparative Politics Russia

Advanced search

THE ROLE OF THE US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2022-3-13-94-110

Abstract

The article examines the reconciliation mechanism of protectionist and liberalization components in the economic policy of the United States and China. Under tightening economic competition, the U.S. and China are implementing a set of measures to support national economies, aimed both at protecting the industries which are crucial for the development of the states, and at ensuring markets for the goods produced in the country. These observations have led to the hypothesis that the set of protectionist and liberalization tools in the economic policy of countries is combined and varied to ensure economic security and international competitiveness of national economies. Based on the analysis of indicators measuring the openness of the US and PRC economies as well as a number of examples of government intervention in the economy, the authors detect the trend towards the strengthening of protectionism in the economic policy of the states since 2008. Taking into consideration the research on the participation of both countries in globalization and integration projects, the authors determine the protectionist instruments implemented by China and the USA to improve the economic growth and competitive advantage of their economies. In particular, government subsidies, fiscal tools, administrative barriers, as well as tariff measures affecting the foreign trade of the countries under study have been identified. On the basis of the comparative analysis of certain indicators measuring the manifestation of protectionist and liberalization components in the economic policy of the United States and China, the authors highlight common and different trends in combining protectionism and free trade. The synthesis of findings has led to the conclusion about the complementarity and interdependence of the tools used in the economic policy of the states aimed at increasing the competitive advantages of national economies.

 

About the Authors

O. V. BOGAEVSKAYA
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)
Russian Federation

Dr Oksana V. BOGAEVSKAYA – PhD in Economics, Senior Research Fellow, Center for the North American Studies

23 Profsoyuznaya Street, Moscow, 117997



A. R. VOITOLOVSKAYA
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)
Russian Federation

Dr Aleksandra R. VOITOLOVSKAYA – PhD in Political Science, Research Fellow, Center for the North American Studies

23 Profsoyuznaya Street, Moscow, 117997



V. Yu. ZHURAVLEVA
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)
Russian Federation

Dr Victoria Yu. ZHURAVLEVA – PhD in Political Science, Head, Center for the North American Studies

23 Profsoyuznaya Street, Moscow, 117997



References

1. Bogaevskaya O.V., Bunina A.A. et al. (2022) Pervyj god Dzh.Bajdena v Belom dome [J. Biden’s first year in the White House]. Analiz i prognoz. Zhurnal IMEMO RAN [Analysis and forecast. Journal of IMEMO RAS] 1: 54–77. (In Russian).

2. Borisova A.R., ZHuravleva V.YU. (2018) Amerikanskoe gosudarstvo: krizis doveriya [The American state: a crisis of confidence]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations] 5(62): 88—96. (In Russian).

3. Zhuravleva V.Yu. (2021) Amerikanskij prezident v polyarizovannoj srede: ot B. Obamy k Dzh. Bajdenu [The American president in a polarized environment: from B. Obama to J. Biden]. Vestnik SPbGU. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Vestnik SPbSU. International relations] 14(3): 334—347. (In Russian).

4. Zhuravleva V.Yu. (2022) Levaya dilemma Dzh Bajdena i Demokraticheskoj partii [The leftist dilemma of J. Biden and the Democratic Party]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations] 12(66): 5–15. (In Russian).

5. Zhuravleva V.Yu. (2011) Peretyagivanie kanata vlasti: vzaimodejstvie Prezidenta i Kongressa v SSHA [Tug-of-war of power: the interaction of the President and Congress in the United States]. M., IMEMO RAN. 163 p. (In Russian).

6. Kirichenko E.V. (2010) SSHA v poiskah otvetov na vyzovy XXI veka (social’no-ekonomicheskij aspekt) [The USA in search of answers to the challenges of the XXI century (socioeconomic aspect)]. Ed(s): E.V. Kirichenko. M., IMEMO RAN. 290 p. (In Russian).

7. Marzcinkevich V.I. (1999) Social’no-ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’: opyt SShA. Rol’ gosudarstva [Socio Economic Efficiency: American Experience. The State Role]. Ed(s): V.I. Marzcinkevich. Moscow. Nayka. 270 p. (In Russian).

8. Marzcinkevich V.I. (2000) Social’no-ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’: opyt SShA. Sistema samorazvitiya. [Socio Economic Efficiency: American Experience. The System of SelfDevelopment]. Ed(s): V.I. Marzcinkevich. Moscow. Nayka. 301 p. (In Russian).

9. Hetherington M.J., Rudolph T.J. (2015) Why Washington won’t work. Polarization. Political Trust and the Governing Crisis. The University of Chicago Press. P. 278.

10. Lind M. (2013) The Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States. Harper Paperbacks. P. 592.


Review

For citations:


BOGAEVSKAYA O.V., VOITOLOVSKAYA A.R., ZHURAVLEVA V.Yu. THE ROLE OF THE US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT. Comparative Politics Russia. 2022;13(3):94-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2022-3-13-94-110

Views: 205


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2221-3279 (Print)
ISSN 2412-4990 (Online)