Dynamics of protectionism and free trade measures in the competitive confrontation between the United States and China

The article examines the reconciliation mechanism of protectionist and liberalization components in the economic policy of the United States and China. Under tightening economic competition, the U.S. and China are implementing a set of measures to support national economies, aimed both at protecting the industries which are crucial for the development of the states, and at ensuring markets for the goods produced in the country. These observations have led to the hypothesis that the set of protectionist and liberalization tools in the economic policy of countries is combined and varied to ensure economic security and international competitiveness of national economies. Based on the analysis of indicators measuring the openness of the US and PRC economies as well as a number of examples of government intervention in the economy, the authors detect the trend towards the strengthening of protectionism in the economic policy of the states since 2008. Taking into consideration the research on the participation of both countries in globalization and integration projects, the authors determine the protectionist instruments implemented by China and the USA to improve the economic growth and competitive advantage of their economies. In particular, government subsidies, fiscal tools, administrative barriers, as well as tariff measures affecting the foreign trade of the countries under study have been identified. On the basis of the comparative analysis of certain indicators measuring the manifestation of protectionist and liberalization components in the economic policy of the United States and China, the authors highlight common and different trends in combining protectionism and free trade. The synthesis of findings has led to the conclusion about the complementarity and interdependence of the tools used in the economic policy of the states aimed at increasing the competitive advantages of national economies.

1. Fajgelbaum P., Goldberg P., Kennedy P., et al. (2019) The Return to Protectionism. w25638. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: 10.3386/w25638.

2. Friis K. and Lysne O. (2021) Huawei, 5G and Security: Technological Limitations and Political Responses. Development and Change 52(5): 1174–1195. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12680.

3. García-Herrero A. (2021) What is Behind China’s Dual Circulation Strategy. 3927117, SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3927117.

4. Jones K. (2021) Populism and Trade: The Challenge to the Global Trading System. 1st ed. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190086350.001.0001.

5. Reuveny R. and Thompson W.R. (2001) Explaining Protectionism: 17 Perspectives and One Common Denominator. Global Society 15(3): 229–249. DOI: 10.1080/13600820120066249.

6. Rose A.K. (2013) The march of an economic idea? Protectionism isn’t counter-cyclic (anymore). Economic Policy 28(76): 569–612. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0327.12017.

7. Wallerstein I. (1980) The Modern World-System II. Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy. New York – London, pp. 233–267.

8. Afontsev S.A. (2020) Politika i ekonomika torgovyh vojn [Politics and economics of trade wars]. Zhurnal Novoj ekonomicheskoj associacii [Journal of the New Economic Association] 45(1): 193–198. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2020-45-1-9. (In Russian).

9. Chudinova K.O. (2019) Vliyanie politiki D. Trampa na mezhdunarodnuyu torgovlyu [The Influence of D. Trump’s Policy on International Trade]. Mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya i torgovaya politika [International Trade and Trade Policy] 3(19): 65–82. DOI: 10.21686/ 2410-7395-2019-3-65-82. (In Russian).

10. Dmitriev S.S. (2020) Amerikano-kitajskoe tekhnologicheskoe sopernichestvo: ot “vysokomeriya” k bojkotu [U.S.–China Technological Rivalry: from “Arrogance” to Boycott]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations] 64(12): 70–77. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-12-70-77. (In Russian).

11. Gal’chenko E.A. (2019) Preimushchestva svobodnoj torgovli: dinamicheskij analiz [The Advantages of Free Trade: Dynamic Analysis]. Voprosy teoreticheskoj ekonomiki [Issues of Economic Theory] 1(4): 46–58. DOI: 10.24411/2587-7666-2019-10104. (In Russian).

12. Galimullin A.M. (2021) Evolyuciya vneshnepoliticheskoj linii KNR v Sovete bezopasnosti OON [The PRC’s UNSC Policy Evolution]. Sravnitel’naya politika [Comparative Politics] 12(3): 186–191. DOI 10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10035. (In Russian).

13. Hildebrand B. (2020) Politicheskaya ekonomiya nastoyashchego i budushchego. (Cherez prizmu istoricheskogo metoda issledovaniya ekonomicheskih yavlenij) [The Political Economy of the Present and the Future. (Through the Prism of the Historical Method of Investigating Economic Phenomena)]. URSS. (In Russian).

14. Inozemtsev M.I., Gusejnov Sh.R. ogly (2018) O protivorechivosti otdel’nyh polozhenij sovremennogo korporativnogo upravleniya i praktiki cifrovoj transformacii hozyajstvuyushchih sub’ektov i obshchestva [Contradiction Between the Modern Corporate Governance’s Theory And Practice of Businesses And Companies within Digital Transformation]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [MGIMO Review of International Relations] 6(63): 294–316. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-6-63-294-316. (In Russian).

15. Kashin V.B. (2021) Voenno-promyshlennoe i voenno-ekonomicheskoe izmereniya amerikano-kitajskogo sopernichestva [Military-Industrial and Military-Economic Dimensions of Sino-US Rivalry]. Sravnitel’naya politika [Comparative Politics] 12(3): 85–97. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10029. (In Russian).

16. Koval’chuk Yu.A., Pichkov O.B., Stepnov I.M. (2019) Integracionnaya rol’ gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya i gosudarstvennoj podderzhki nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya [The Integration Role of State Regulation And State Support for Research And Technological Development]. Drukerovskij vestnik [Drukerovskij vestnik] 4(30): 70–83. DOI: 10.17213/23126469-2019-4-70-83. (In Russian).

17. Lipatnikova A.V. (2018) Torgovyj protekcionizm Kitaya i SSHA v usloviyah global’noj tekhnologicheskoj konkurencii [Trade Protectionism of China and the United States in the Context of Global Technological Competition]. Novye napravleniya nauchnoj mysli: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [New Directions in Scientific Thought: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference], Rostov-on-Don, Russia, December 13, 2018, P. 232-234. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov State University of Economics. (In Russian).

18. Luzyanin S.G. (2021) Kitajsko-amerikanskie otnosheniya posle D. Trampa: ocenki, podhody, perspektivy [Sino-American Relations after D. Trump: Assessments, Approaches, Prospects]. SSHA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul’tura [USA & Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture] 51(8): 75–80. DOI:10.31857/S268667300016028-0. (In Russian).

19. Maltsev A.A., Chichilimov S.V. (2021) Istoki protivostoyaniya fritrederstva i protekcionizma v ekonomicheskoj teorii [Origins of the Confrontation Between Free Trade and Protectionism in Economic Theory]. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika [Theoretical Economy] 12(84): 69–81. DOI: 10.52957/22213260_2021_12_69. (In Russian).

20. Milovidov V.D., Asker-Zade N.V. (2020) Protekcionizm 2.0: novaya real’nost’ epohi globalizacii [Protectionism 2.0: New Reality in the Age of Globalisation]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations] 64(8): 37–45. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-8-37-45. (In Russian).

21. Obolenskij V.P. (2018) Ot legitimnogo protekcionizma k torgovym vojnam? [From Legitimate Protectionism to Trade Wars?] Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations] 62(9): 18–25. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-201862-9-18-25. (In Russian).

22. Stepnov I.M., Koval’chuk Yu.A. (2020) Cifrovye vyzovy i spravedlivost’ nalogov [Digital Challenges and Tax Equity]. Cifrovoe pravo [Digital Law Journal] 1(1): 39–58. DOI: 10.38044/DLJ-2020-1-1-39-5. (In Russian).

23. Taskaeva S.V. (2021) Protekcionizm i politika svobodnoj torgovli v sovremennyh vneshnetorgovyh otnosheniyah Kitaya i SSHA [Protectionism and Free Trade Policy in Contemporary China-US Foreign Trade Relations]. SSHA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul’tura [USA & Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture] 51(3): 73–80. DOI: 10.31857/ S268667300013922-4. (In Russian).