Сomparative study of territorial ethnic autonomies
https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2022-1-2-13-25-37
Abstract
The article discusses the approaches and methods of territorial ethnic autonomies comparative research that are part of both federal and unitary states. The statement on the dual role that these autonomies play is substantiated. The analysis of autonomous communities to assess positive and negative practices is possible only on the basis of comparison. The general features of autonomies are shown depending on the form of government. The influence of the ethnic factor on the autonomy and state institutions is revealed. The research focused on comparative analysis of ethnic autonomies, including the definition of the main comparison options for studying the distribution of power between the autonomy and the state, the selection of indicators that reveal them. The article reveals the possibilities of processing the obtained data for each group of indicators using quantitative and qualitative research methods.
About the Authors
M. Kh. FARUKSHIN
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr Midkhat Kh. FARUKSHIN – Professor, Department of Political Science
35 Kremlevskaya Street, Bld. 14/2, Kazan
A. R. ZARIPOVA
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr Aigul R. ZARIPOVA – Associate Professor, Department of Political Science
35 Kremlevskaya Street, Bld. 14/2, Kazan, Russia.
References
1. Anderson L., Costa C. (2016) Survival of the Fittest: Explaining the Success of Ethnic Autonomy Arrangements. Swiss Political Science Review 22(4): 516–544.
2. Ghai Y. (2013) Introduction: Nature and Origins of Autonomy. In: Practicing SelfGovernment: A Comparative Study of Autonomous Regions. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–31.
3. Schmidt U. (2008) Language Loss and the Ethnic Identity of Minorities. ECMI Issue Brief, 18. 15 p.
4. Shaykhutdinov R. (2010) Give Peace a Chance: Nonviolent Protest and the Creation of territorial autonomy arrangements. Journal of Peace Research 47(2): 179–191.
5. Wolff St. (2011) Managing Ethnic Conflict: The Merits and Perils of Territorial Accommodation. Political Studies Review 9(1): 26–41.
6. Woodman S., Ghai Y. (2013) Comparative perspectives on institutional frameworks for autonomy. In: Practicing Self-Government: A Comparative Study of Autonomous Regions. Cambridge University Press, pp. 449–486.
7. Balansiruya prityazaniya: etnicheskiye regional’nyye avtonomii, tselostnost’ gosudarstva i prava etnicheskikh men’shinstv [Balancing Claims: Ethnic Regional Autonomy, State Integrity, and Ethnic Minority Rights] (2017) Ed. P. Panov. Moscow: Political encyclopedia, 231 p. (In Russian).
8. Mochalov A.N. (2017) Territorial’noye ustroystvo gosudarstva kak sposob upravleniya etnicheskim mnogoobraziyem (konstitutsionno-pravovoye regulirovaniye v stranakh BRIKS) [Territorial Structure of State as a Tool of Ethnic Diversity Management (Constitutional Law Regulation in the BRICS Countries]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics] 3: 154–173. (In Russian).
9. Panov P.V. (2016) Mir etnicheskikh regional’nykh avtonomiy: predstavleniye novoy bazy dannykh [The World of Ethnic Regional Autonomies: Introducing a New Database]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya [Bulletin of Perm University. Political science] 4: 66–93. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
FARUKSHIN M.Kh., ZARIPOVA A.R. Сomparative study of territorial ethnic autonomies. Comparative Politics Russia. 2022;13(1-2):25-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2022-1-2-13-25-37
Views:
350
Email this article 