International and Regional Studies: Towards a «Seamless» Methodology of Analysis. Discussing the book: Logika novoy miroustroitel'noy arkhitektoniki i strategii derzhav (The Logic of the New World Architectonics and the Strategies of the Powers). Ed. by Alexei D. Voskressenski. Moscow: Strategicheskiye izyskaniya, 2021. 576 p.

   The paper is dedicated to the key methodological problems of international and regional studies and the prospects for the formation of a unifi ed, «seamless» methodology. The author's refl ections are illustrated by examples from the collective monograph, ed. by Alexei D. Voskressenski “The Logic of the New World Architectonics and the Strategies of the Powers” (2021). At the fi rst stage, the question of the levels of analysis in international studies is investigated with a special emphasis on the systemic level, as well as the practical diffi culties of decomposition of international political situations, taking into account the high density of social ties. The applied value of network analysis and event analysis is shown. The phenomenon of transregionalism, which is of great importance for international economic relations, is considered from a network point of view. Methodological tools for the analysis of trans-regional institutions are presented as well. Much attention is paid to the organismic concept of the general theory of the system and its adaptation to the IR system. The practical use of this concept in organizing situational analyzes of international processes is shown. The regional level of analysis and the place of the “middle-level powers” in the world system are revealed through the prism of an agent-structural “matryoshka” (nested model) – agent-structural problem at different levels of
analysis. The limits and possibilities of application of the complexity theory in the analysis of IR are explored. Special attention is paid to the concept of complex interdependence of R. Keohane and J. Nye, which, according to the author, adequately refl ects modern IR and is the key to understanding the formation of zones of infl uence of great powers in world politics. Finally, the work reveals the normative component of IR theory and shows an increasing popularity of non-Western IR theories in the last few years. The normativity in regional studies is explored as well and particular cases of the application of non-Western approaches in regional studies are shown. The necessity of integration of non-Western approaches to IR theory and regional research is declared.

1. Acharya, A. Towards a Global International Relations? E-International Relations, 10.12.2017. Mode of access: https://www.e-ir.info/2017/12/10/towards-a-global-international-relations/

2. Alekseeva, T. A.; Degterev, D. A. Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya: spor o nauke i metode (International Studies: a Dispute on Science and Method) // Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2017, No. 87 (09), pp. 848-857.

3. Anderson, J.; van Wincoop, E. Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle // American Economic Review, 2003, No. 1, pp. 170-192.

4. Baum, V. V.; Degterev, D. A.; Zyabkina, E. I. Desyat’ let bez diplomaticheskogo priznaniya: prikladnoy analiz rossiysko-gruzinskikh otnosheniy (2008-2018 gg.) (10 year without Diplomatic Recognition: Applied Analysis of Russia-Georgia Bilateral Relations (2008-2018)) // Problemy natsional’noy strategii, 2019, No. 4, pp. 70-86.

5. Braumoeller, B. The Great Powers and the International System: Systemic Theory in Empirical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. P. 16.

6. Degterev, D. A. Nezapadnyye teorii razvitiya v epokhu global’nogo kapitalizma (Non-Western Theories of Development in the Global Capitalism Era) // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 2021, No. 4, pp. 113-122.

7. Degterev, D. A. Setevoy analiz mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (Network Analysis of International Relations) // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 2015, No. 4, pp. 119-138.

8. Degterev, D. A.; Istomin, I. A. Sistemnoye modelirovaniye mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (Systemic Modeling of International Relations) // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 2015, No. 11, p. 22.

9. Degterev, D. A.; Moiseev, V. B. Razdelitel’nyye linii vo vneshney politike stran Yuzhnoy Ameriki: opyt prikladnogo analiza (South American Dividing Lines: an Attempt to Use Applied Analysis) // Latinskaya Amerika, 2017, No. 3, pp. 29-42.

10. Degterev, D. A.; Ramich, M. S. Strategicheskiye treugol’niki kak instrument balansirovaniya v mirovoy politike (Strategic Triangles and Balancing in World Politics) // Kontury global’nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2021, No. 3, pp. 23-43.

11. Degterev, D. A.; Ramich, M. S.; Tsvyk, A. V. U. S.-China: “Power Transition” and the Outlines of “Confl ict Bipolarity” // Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2021, No. 2, pp. P. 210-231.

12. Degterev, D. A.; Savicheva, E. M.; Mateva, I. M. Dinamicheskiy khaos, konfl ikty na Bol’shom Blizh nem Vostoke i mekhanizmy global’nogo upravleniya v XXI v. (materialy Ekspertnogo seminara i Situatsionnogo analiza RUDN) (Dynamic Chaos, Confl icts in the Greater Middle East and Global Governance Mechanisms in the XXI Century (Proceedings of PFUR’s Expert Seminars and Situational Analysis)) // Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2015, No. 3, pp. 9-23.

13. Fituni, L. L.; Abramova, I. O. Political Theory of Decolonization: Imperatives of Modern Reading // Polis. Political Studies, 2020, No. 6, pp. 26-40.

14. Goldstein, J. A Confl ict-Cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data // Journal of Confl ict Resolution, 1992, No. 2, pp. 369-385.

15. Grachikov, E. N. Kitayskaya shkola mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy: na puti k bol’shim teoriyam (Chinese School of International Relations: Towards Big Theories). Moscow: Aspect Press, 2021. Pp. 220-254

16. Hoffmann, S. An American Social Science: International Relations // Daedalus, 1977, No. 3, pp. 41-60.

17. Kavalski, E. The Fifth Debate and the Emergence of Complex International Relations Theory: Notes on the Application of Complexity Theory to the Study of International Life // Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2007, No. 3, p. 445.

18. Keohane, R.; Nye, J. Power & Interdependence, 4th Edition. N. Y.: Pearson, 2012.

19. Kompleksnaya mezhdistsiplinarnaya metodika RUDN situatsionnogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh konfl iktov (A Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Methodology of the RUDN University for the Situational Analysis of International Confl icts). Ed. by D. A. Degterev, V. G. Dzhangiryan, V. A. Tsvyk. Moscow: RUDN, 2014. 110 p.

20. Logika novoy miroustroitel'noy arkhitektoniki i strategii derzhav (The Logic of the New World Architectonics and the Strategies of the Powers). Ed. by Alexei D. Voskressenski. Moscow: Strategicheskiye izyskaniya, 2021. 576 p.

21. Mirovoe kompleksnoe regionovedenie (World Comprehensive Regional Studies). Ed. by Alexei D. Voskressenski. Moscow: Magistr: INFRA-M publ., 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020.

22. Ngwane, T.; Bond, P. South Africa’s Shrinking Sovereignty: Economic Crises, Ecological Damage, SubImperialism and Social Resistances // Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2020, No. 1, pp. 67-83.

23. Ot sistemnoy istorii k rossiyskoy teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy. Interv’yu s professorom Alekseyem Demosfenovichem Bogaturovym (From Systemic IR History to the Russian IR Theory. Interview with Professor Alexei D. Bogaturov) // Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2020, No. 3, pp. 574-584.

24. Power and Infl uence in the Globalized World. Atlantic Council, 2018.

25. Primakov, E. M.; Gantman, V. I.; Lyubchenko, V. I. Metodika situatsionnogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (Methodology for Situational Analysis of International Relations). Moscow: IMEMO. 1974 // Archive of IMEMO RAS. Pp. 5-7.

26. Russian Translation of: Said, E. Orientalism. N. Y.: Vintage Books, 1979.

27. Savin, L. V. Ordo Pluriversalis. Vozrozhdeniye mnogopolyarnogo miroustroystva (Ordo Pluriversalis. Revival of a Multipolar World Order). Moscow: Publishing house “Kislorod”, 2020. Pp. 437-440.

28. Sistema, struktura i protsess razvitiya sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (System, Structure and Development Process of Modern International Relations). Ed. by V. I. Gantman. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. Pp. 310-398.

29. Strange, S. State and Markets. 2 nd Edition. London: Continuum, 1994.

30. Temby, O. What Are Levels of Analysis and What Do They Contribute to International Relations Theory? // Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2015, No. 4, pp. 721-742.

31. Voskressenski, Alexei D. Non-Western Theories of International Relations. Springer Nature International: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

32. Wallerstein, I. The Modern World-System. I. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. N. Y.: Academic Press, 2011.

33. Waltz, K. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 2001. 263 p.

34. Waltz, K. Theory of International Politics. N. Y.: Addison-Wisley Publishing Company, 1979. Pp. 73-77.

35. Yatmanova, M. G. Sistemnyy analiz v issledovaniyakh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (Systems Analysis in the Study of International Relations). SPb: SPbGU, 2010. 156 p.