The Concept of “World Order”: Theories and Reality

At present, there is no common perception in modern science and international political practice of what the world (international) order (legal order) is. The article analyzes the relevant points of view. It is concluded that by referring to the relevant provisions, generally accepted in the framework of the general theory of law and the theory of international law, it is possible to get close enough to the solution of this problem. The article also examines other problems related to the essence of the concepts of the world (international) order and its types (world public order, world legal order and global world legal order), and also the varieties of social norms of the international regulatory system, the results of the implementation of which shape the corresponding orders. Special attention is paid to the fact that, in contrast to the widespread perceptions, all three types of world order are neither a set of international relations, nor a set of norms regulating such relations. According to the theory of international law, they are the result of the implementation of the requirements of certain norms of the international regulatory system aimed at managing international public relations. In addition, various factors influence the state of a particular type of international order (including a change in the hierarchy of states depending on their role in the international political and/or economic system, the formation of new centers of power, a change in bipolarity, polycentricity or monocentricity of the world, the emergence of multilateral integration formations, the activities of international multilateral institutions, etc.), but they should also not be confused with international orders themselves.

world order, world public order, world legal order, global world legal order, international regulatory system

1. Batalov, Je.Ja. Mirovoe razvitie i mirovoj porjadok (World Development and World Order). Moscow: ROSSPJeN. 2005. 374 p.

2. Bogaturov, A.D. Sovremennyj mezhdunarodnyj porjadok (The Contemporary International Order) // Mezhdunarodnye processy, 2003, No. 1, pp. 6-23.

3. Bull, H. Anarhicheskoe obshhestvo: issledovanie problemy porjadka v mirovoj politike (The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics). Antologija mirovoj politicheskoj mysli (Anthology of World Political Thought): V 5 t. T. II. Zarubezhnaja politicheskaja mysl’ HH veka. Moscow: Mysl’, 1997. Pp. 801-806.

4. Bull, H. The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. New Jersey. Columbia Univ. Press, 2002. 368 p.

5. Bull, H. The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. L.: Macmillan, 1985. 140 р.

6. Chalmers M. Which Rules? Why There is No Single «Rules-Based International System» / Royal United Service Institute for Defence and Security Studies. Occasional Paper, 2019. April. Рp. 1-52.

7. Cox, R. Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory // Millennium – Journal of International Studies. 1981. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 126–155.

8. Davydov, Ju.P. Norma protiv sily: Problema miroregulirovanija (Norm vs. Force: the Problem of World Regulation). Moscow: Nauka, 2002. 287 p.

9. Falk, R.А. An Approach to the World Order Studies and the World System. N.Y.: World Order Models Project, 1982. 182 р.

10. Franck, T.M. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. Oxford University Press, 1990. 303 p.

11. Gadzhiev, K.S. Geopoliticheskie gorizonty Rossii: kontury novogo miroporjadka (Russia’s Geopolitical Horizons: Contours of the New World Order). Moscow: Jekonomika, 2007. 751 p.

12. Galkin, A.A. Razmyshlenija o politike i politicheskoj nauke (Reflections on Politics and Political Science). Moscow: Overlej. 2004. 278 p.

13. Grinin, L.E. Mirovoj porjadok v proshlom, nastojashhem i budushhem (World Order in the Past, Present and Future) // Istorija i sovremennost’ (History and Modernity), 2016, No. 1 (23), pp. 20-63.

14. Gromyko, A.A. Izmenjajushhajasja geometrija policentrichnosti (Changing Geometry of Global Polycentricity) // Comparative Politics Russia, 2012, No. 2 (8), pp. 59-63.

15. Gromyko, A.A. Mirovoj porjadok ili pravoporjadok? (World Order or World Legal Order?) // Mezhdunarodnaja zhizn’ (International Affairs), 2012, No. 2(8), pp. 18-32.

16. Hoffman, S. Primacy of World Order: American Foreign Policy since the Cold War. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill book co, 1980. 352 p.

17. Ikenberry, J. After Victory. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. New Jersey, Princeton, 2001. 293 p.

18. Lebedeva, M.M. Politicheskaja sistema mira: projavlenija «vnesistemnosti»: ili novye aktory – starye pravila (Political System of the World: Manifestations of «Outof-System»: or New Actors – Old Rules). «Privatizacija» mirovoj politiki: lokal’nye dejstvija – global’nye rezul’taty («Privatization» of World Politics: Local Actions – Global Results). Moscow: Golden Bi. 2008. Pp. 53-66.

19. Mazarr. M.J.; Priebe, M.; Radin, A.; Cevallos, A.S. Understanding the current international order. A Rand Project to explore US Strategy in a Changing World. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND Corporation, 2016. 64 р.

20. Movchan, A.P. Mezhdunarodnyj pravoporjadok (International legal order). Moscow: Izd-vo IGiP RAN. 1996. 102 p.

21. Nye, J.S. What New World Order? // Foreign Affairs, 1992, Vol. 71, No. 84, pp. 83-96.

22. Sirota, N.M. Ponjatie «mirovoj porjadok» v sovremennom teoreticheskom diskurse (The concept of «world order» in modern theoretical discourse). Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul’turologija i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki (Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice). 2013. No. 3 (29): v 2-h ch. Ch. II. Pp. 177-181.

23. Strezhneva, M.V. Priverzhennost’ Evrosojuza principu mnogostoronnosti v uslovijah transformacii mirovogo porjadka (The EU’s Commitment to the Principle of Multilateralism in the Context of the Transformation of the World Order) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija i mirovaja politika, 2016, No. 2, pp. 3-30.

24. Tsygankov, P.A. Teorija mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij (International Relations Theory). Moscow: Gardariki. 2003. 590 p.

25. Vaskonselos, A. de. Mnogopoljarnost’, stanovjashhajasja «mnogostoronnej» (Multipolarity, Becoming «Multilateral») // Geopolitika (Geopolitics), 2011, pp. 52-73.

26. Ward, A. «Adapt or Die», Ideas for Modernizing the Rules-Based International Order. Chatham House Expert Perspectives. June 2019.