Preview

Comparative Politics Russia

Advanced search

Lobbying Development in Post-Socialist Countries of the European Union: Comparative Analysis of Slovenian and Polish Models

https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10010

Abstract

In order to promote industrialization and improve the living standards of the population in the Sub-Current article is dedicated to lobbying development in post-socialist EU member states from Central andEastern Europe. This is an important and at the same time insufficiently studied aspect of political systems in CEE. Models of lobbying inSloveniaandPolandthat are analyzed in the article, demonstrate that there is no single vector of lobbying development in postsocialist countries. It is shown that interaction between interest groups and decision makers is influenced by following factors: dynamics and state of interest group systems, mechanism of interaction between interest groups and decision makers, Europeanization of politics, and particularities of lobbying regulation. Author comes to several conclusions: 1) Both countries have inherited tradition of informal political relations, but there is difference between corporatist model in Slovenia that resulted in more stable interest group system and Polish neoliberal model that gave birth to more conflict driven interest group system; 2) Europeanization of politics had different impact on the state of lobbying on national level, fostering its development in Slovenian case and having little impact in Poland; 3) Although majority of lobbying is happening in the executive branch, parties are the main mediators between interest groups and decision making; 4) Neither of analyzed countries are ideal in terms of lobbying regulation. However,Sloveniadid progress further in comparison withPoland, using more transparent registration and reporting for lobbyists and officials and also regulating indirect forms of lobbying; at the same time most of lobbying takes places in shadows while regulation aimed only at professional consultants is not efficient enough.

About the Author

P. S. Kanevsky
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Pavel S. Kanevsky, Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and Sociology of Political Processes

Moscow



References

1. Almond, G. A Comparative Study of Interest Groups and the Political Process // The American Political Science Review. 1958, Vol. 52, No. 1.

2. Almond, G.; Powell, J.; Strom, K.; Dalton, R. Sravnitel’naia politologiia segodnia. Mirovoi obzor. Moscow, 2002, pp. 136-138.

3. Blavoukos, S.; Pagoulatos, G. Enlargement Waves and Interest Group Participation in the EU Policy-Making System: Establishing a Framework of Analysis // West European Politics, 2008, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 1147-1165.

4. Bohle, D.; Greskovits, B.The State, Internationalization, and Capitalist Diversity in Eastern Europe // Competition & Change, 2007, Vol. 11, No. 2.

5. Crowley, S.; Ost, D. Workers after Workers’ States: Labor and Politics in Post-communist Eastern Europe. Oxford, 2001.

6. Fink-Hafner, D. Interest Representation in Postcommunist Parliaments over Two Decades // Legislative Studies, 2011, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 215-233.

7. Fink-Hafner, D. Organized Interests in the PolicyMaking Process in Slovenia // Journal of European Public Policy, 1998, Vol. 5, No. 2.

8. Fink-Hafner, D.; Hafner-Fink, M.; Novak, M. Europeanisation as a Factor of National Interest Group Political-Cultural Change: The Case of Interest Groups in Slovenia // East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 2015, Vol. 29, No. 1.

9. Gwiazda, A. Democracy in Poland: Representation, Participation, Competition and Accountability since 1989. Routledge, 2015.

10. Holman, C.; Luneburg, W. Lobbying and Transparency: A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Reform // Interest Groups & Advocacy. 2012, Vol. 1., No 1, pp. 75-104.

11. Hrebenar, R.; Morgan, B. Lobbying in America: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO, 2009.

12. Kavoliunaite-Ragauskiene, E. How to Define a Lobbyist: Experience of Poland and Lithuania // Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 2017, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 29-56.

13. McGrath, C. The Development and Regulation of Lobbying in the New Member States of the European Union // Journal of Public Affairs, 2008, No. 8, pp. 15-32.

14. Millar, C.; Koppl, P. Perspectives, Practices and Prospects of Public Affairs in Central and Eastern Europe: a Lobbying Future Anchored in an Institutional Context // Journal of Public Affairs, 2014, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 4-17.

15. Mulcahy, S. Lobbying in Europe. Hidden Influence, Privileged Access. Transparency International, 2015.

16. Rees, N.; Paraskevopoulos, C. Europeanization of Policy-Making and Domestic Governance Structures in Regional Policy: Cohesion and CEE Countries / Adapting to EU Multi-Level Governance. Ed. by Paraskevopoulos C., Getimis P., Rees N. London, 2006, 336 p.

17. Sallai, D. European Union Lobbying and the Golden Cage of Post-Socialist Network Capitalism in Hungary Journal of Common Market Studies, 2013, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 948-964.

18. Stanojevic, M. Slovenia: Neo-corporatism under the Neoliberal Turn // Employee Relations, 2018, Vol. 40, No. 4.


Review

For citations:


Kanevsky P.S. Lobbying Development in Post-Socialist Countries of the European Union: Comparative Analysis of Slovenian and Polish Models. Comparative Politics Russia. 2021;12(1):134-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10010

Views: 718


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2221-3279 (Print)
ISSN 2412-4990 (Online)