“Taiwan Nation”: From Myth to Reality?
https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10009
Abstract
The article studies the theoretical and practical aspects of the development ofTaiwan’s residents’ national identity. The analysis is based on the results of recent opinion polls which studied the trends in identity change of the Taiwanese people, their preferences and views on relations with mainlandChina. An attempt was made to establish a correlation between the changing identity, the wish of the majority of the population to maintain the status quo in relations with the PRC and the level of support of the political independence ofTaiwan. The article shows that the share of those inTaiwanwho identify as “Taiwanese” has been increasing over the last decades. At the same time, the belief thatTaiwanis an independent state has also been strengthening. The authors analyse the internal and external factors that influenced the dynamics of identity change and the attitudes towards the problems of the status ofTaiwanon the island over the last two years.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. D. DikarevRussian Federation
Andrey D. Dikarev, Candidate of History, Leading Researcher, Center for East Asian and SCO Studies
Moscow
A. V. Lukin
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Lukin, Doctor of History, Head of the Department of International Relations, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Director, Center for East Asian and SCO Studies, MGIMO University
Moscow
References
1. Kedourie, Elie. Nationalism, 4th ed. Oxford and Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell, 1993.
2. Baryshnikov, V.N. The role of Liao Wen-yi’s Group in the US Aggressive Plans in Taiwan // Kratkie soobshcheniia INAZ, 1963, No. 56, pp. 119-129.
3. Kuznetsov, A.M. Ethno-national policy and modern problems of nation-building in China. Vladivostok: Izd-vo DVGU. 2010.
4. Brown, M. Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture? Power an Migration of Changing Identities. California University, 2004.
5. Lee, Teng-Hui. Taiwan’s Viewpoint. Moscow: MGU, 2000.
6. Fleischauer, Stefan. Taiwan’s Independence Movement. in: Gunter Schubert (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Taiwan. Abingdon, Oxon & New York, Routledge. 2016.
7. Liu, Fu-kuo. Ma Ying-jeou’s Rapprochement Policy: Cross-Strait Progress and Domestic Constraint / in JeanPierre Cabestan and Jacques deLisle (eds), Political Changes in Taiwan under Ma Ying-jeou: Partisan Conflict, Policy Choices, External Constraints and Security Challenges. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. Pp. 139-155.
8. Kaimova, A.S. Problemy interpretatsii ponyatiya «tayvan’skaya identichnost’» (Problems of Interpreting the Notion of “Taiwanese Identity”) // Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 13. Vostokovedenie, 2013, No. 2, pp. 27-39.
9. Moskalev, A.A. Natsiya i natsionalizm v Kitaye: evolyutsiya kit. mysli v podkhodakh k natsii i natsionalizmu (Nation and Nationalism in China: the Evolution of the Chinese Thought in Approaches to Nation and Nationalism). Moscow: Pamiatniki ist. mysli, 2005.
10. Kedourie, Elie. Nationalism, 4th ed. Oxford and Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell, 1993.
11. Russel, Hsiao. New Polling Data Reflect Deepening Taiwanese Identity // Global Taiwan Institute, 02/08/2019. Mode of access: https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=2502
12. Kuznetsov, A.M. Ethno-national policy and modern problems of nation-building in China. Vladivostok: Izd-vo DVGU. 2010.
13. Shirley, A. Kan. China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy ‒ Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei. Congressional Research Service 7-5700, October 10, 2014. P. 49.
14. Lee, Teng-Hui. Taiwan’s Viewpoint. Moscow: MGU, 2000.
15. Syaru, Shirley Lin. Analyzing the Relationship between Identity and Democratization in Taiwan and Hong Kong in the Shadow of China / Special Forum Chinese University of Hong Kong. December 20,2018. Mode of access:
16. Liu, Fu-kuo. Ma Ying-jeou’s Rapprochement Policy: Cross-Strait Progress and Domestic Constraint / in JeanPierre Cabestan and Jacques deLisle (eds), Political Changes in Taiwan under Ma Ying-jeou: Partisan Conflict, Policy Choices, External Constraints and Security Challenges. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. Pp. 139-155.
17. Wu, Yu-shan. The Evolution of the KMT’s Stance on the One-China Principle: National Identity in Flux. In Gunter Schubert, Jens Damm (eds) Taiwanese Identity in the Twenty-first Century: Domestic, Regional and Global Perspectives. London: Routledge, 2011.
18. Moskalev, A.A. Natsiya i natsionalizm v Kitaye: evolyutsiya kit. mysli v podkhodakh k natsii i natsionalizmu (Nation and Nationalism in China: the Evolution of the Chinese Thought in Approaches to Nation and Nationalism). Moscow: Pamiatniki ist. mysli, 2005.
19. Russel, Hsiao. New Polling Data Reflect Deepening Taiwanese Identity // Global Taiwan Institute, 02/08/2019. Mode of access: https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=2502
20. Shirley, A. Kan. China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy ‒ Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei. Congressional Research Service 7-5700, October 10, 2014. P. 49.
21. Syaru, Shirley Lin. Analyzing the Relationship between Identity and Democratization in Taiwan and Hong Kong in the Shadow of China / Special Forum Chinese University of Hong Kong. December 20,2018. Mode of access:
22. Wu, Yu-shan. The Evolution of the KMT’s Stance on the One-China Principle: National Identity in Flux. In Gunter Schubert, Jens Damm (eds) Taiwanese Identity in the Twenty-first Century: Domestic, Regional and Global Perspectives. London: Routledge, 2011.
Review
For citations:
Dikarev A.D., Lukin A.V. “Taiwan Nation”: From Myth to Reality? Comparative Politics Russia. 2021;12(1):118-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10009