The Problem of Comparative-Historical Nature of the Soviet Bureaucracy in Theoretical Heritage of L.D. Trotsky
https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10003
Abstract
The article identifies and analyzes the essential provisions of Trotsky's concept regarding the Soviet bureaucracy. Its nature is determined by the connection with the genesis of Stalin's regime of personal power. The intellectual and philosophical tendencies of bureaucracy are a complex of procedures of thought and action, on which the regime of personal power is based as a modification of the enlightened monarchy, the Orthodox Church and the police state. Theories arising in these religious-political forms justify bureaucratic thinking. The history of European and Russian social thought can be studied as a process of selecting those theories that refute bureaucratic thought and practice and counteract the concentration of power in one hand. A historiographic concept is needed for which the value of the state and bureaucracy is not the main one.
According to the paper, Trotsky's views on the Soviet bureaucracy form an important link in the theory and practice of political resistance to the regime of personal power. The history of the USSR is the history of the struggle of the Soviet bureaucracy for its share in revenues and in power. The Stalinist ways of understanding the theory of Marx and the practice of Lenin are false and lead to the bureaucratization of the party and state. There is a similarity between the political practice of Stalin, the activities of the Orthodox Church, the police state, Italian fascism and German Nazism. Any theoretical works commissioned by the pinnacle of the bureaucracy contain the danger of reproducing all the features of the Stalinist way of thinking and acting.
About the Authors
V. P. MakarenkoRussian Federation
Viktor P. Makarenko, Dr. of Philosophy and Political Sciences, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Academician of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine; Head and Principal Researcher at the Center for Political Conceptology, Institute of Philosophy and Socio-Political Sciences
Rostov-on-Don
Reefat Kamaleldin Badawy Khaled
Russian Federation
Khaled Reefat Kamaleldin Badawy, Postgraduate Student, Department of Theoretical and Applied Political Science, Institute of Philosophy and Socio-Political Sciences
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Andreski, S. Samoe uiazvimoe mesto: poniatie ratsional’nosti (The Most Vulnerable Point: the Concept of Rationality) // Politicheskaia kontseptologiia, 2011, No. 1, pp. 210-235.
2. Bakunin, M.A.: pro et contra, antologiia (Pro et Contra, Anthology). 2-e izd., ispr. Sost., vstup.stat’ia, komment. P.I. Talerova. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo RKhGA, 2015. Berlin, I. Istoriia svobody. Rossiia (History of Freedom. Russia). Moscow: NLO, 2001.
3. Cherniavskii, G.I. Lev Trotskii (Lev Trostsky). 2-e izd. Moscow: Molodaia gvardiia, 2012.
4. Fel’shtinskii, Iu.; Cherniavskii, G. Predislovie k tret’emu tomu (Preface to Volume Three) / Trotskii L.D. Stalin. Kniga vtoraia. Moscow, 2011. Pp. 19-21.
5. Ionin, L.; Shkaratan, O. Parkinson i biurokraty (posleslovie-dialog) (Parkinson and the Bureaucrats (afterword dialogue) / Parkinson S.N. Zakony Parkinsona: sbornik. Per. s angl. Sost. i avt. predisl. V.S.Murav’ev. Moscow: Progress, 1989, pp. 426-447.
6. Kliamkin, I.; Kutkovets, T. Kak nas uchat liubit’Rodinu? (How We Are Taught to Love Our Homeland) / Mode of access: https://www.democracy.ru/article.php?id=1136
7. Makarenko, V.P. Sobranie sochinenii: v 3 t. Rostov-naDonu;Taganrog,:izd-voIuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta, 2019. T. 2: Biurokratiia i stalinizm. Politicheskaia inertsiia: opyt refleksii. Legitimna li gosudarstvennaia sluzhba Rossii? (Bureaucracy and Stalinism. Political inertia: the experience of reflection. Is the civil service of Russia legitimate?). Pp. 62-131.
8. Makarenko, V.P.; Khaled Refaat Kemalel’din Badavi. Analiz biurokratii: obshchaia matritsa i problema rossiiskoegipetskoi spetsifiki (Analysis of Bureaucracy: a Common Matrix and the Problem of Russian-Egyptian Specifics) // Gumanitarii Iuga Rossii, 2020, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 84-100.
9. Markin, V.A. Vozvrashchenie P.A. Kropotkina v Rossiiu (1917-1921) (The Return of P.A. Kropotkin to Russia (1917-1921)) / Petr Alekseevich Kropotkin / Ed. by I.I. Blauberg. Moscow: Rossiiskaia politicheskaia entsiklopediia (ROS-SPEN), 2012.
10. Obolonskii,A.V. Krizis biurokraticheskogo gosudarstva. Reformy gosudarstvennoi sluzhby: mezhdunarodnyi opyt i rossiiskie realii (The Crisis of the Bureaucratic State. Civil Service Reforms: International Experience and Russian Realities). Moscow: «Liberal’naia missiia», 2011.
11. Rossiiskoe gosudarstvo: vchera, segodnia, zavtra (Russian State: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow). Ed. By I.M. Kliamkin. Moscow. Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2007.
12. Trotsky, L.D. Stalin. Kniga vtoraya (Stalin. Book two). Moscow: Eksmo, 2011.
Review
For citations:
Makarenko V.P., Khaled R. The Problem of Comparative-Historical Nature of the Soviet Bureaucracy in Theoretical Heritage of L.D. Trotsky. Comparative Politics Russia. 2021;12(1):23-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10003