INSIDE VIEW ON POLITICAL HISTORY OF RUSSIA IN THE 1990s AS A TOOL OF DEMYTHOLOGIZATION

 The purpose of the present research is to explore nature and degree of the subjectivity of the constellation of stereotypes, myths united by the “dashing nineties” cliché that surround the period of 1990s of the Russian history.

The first part of the article is devoted to the literature review on the ontology of social “mythologization” of historical events. It reveals that subjective interpretation of the past (“construction of history”) is signifi cant as a tool for legitimizing the present, primarily the political. In addition, review reveals a number of persistent historical narratives, associated with the 1990s , that have been circulating in Russian political discourse.

The methodological basis of the work are in-depth interviews with people who held positions in Russian offi cial bodies throughout the 1990s . Informants disclosed that life diffi culties that the majority of citizens had faced during the 1990s , coupled with the usage of the negative ideological stamp of “dashing 90s” by the contemporary Russian political regime are the main causes of mythologization. In turn, respondents pointed out that each particular mythology mentioned are the simplifi ed derivatives of the reception of events by ordinary people suffering from a fl awed and incomplete understanding of what was happening.

In conclusion, it is inferred that the presence of a quasi-offi cial state position that reinforce the philistine view of the 1990s imposes certain restrictions on the scope and intensity of public discussion about the role of the 1990s in the history of the Russian state, which defi nitely hinders the demythologization of this period in the mass consciousness. 

1. A Period of Reforms in Russia – Myths and Reality / Ed. by G.V. Osipov. Moscow: ISPR RAS, 2014. 510 p.

2. Actual Problems of Teaching History and Social Science in Schooling Institutions of Various Types: Collective Monography / Ed. by L.V. Alekseeva. Nizhnevartovsk: Nizhnevartovck State University, 2016. 196 p.

3. Alshenqeeti, H. Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review // English Linguistics Research, 2014, No. 1.

4. Carr, E.H. What is History? Penguin UK, 2018.

5. Corn, M.G. Russian Political Myths as Mythologizing of the Past // Vestnik of Moscow State Art and Cultural University, 2011, No. 5, pp. 117-122.

6. Gorbatova, N.V. Phenomenon of Mythology in Russia’s Political Scene: the 90s: Thesis: cand. of political science: 23.00.02 / Natalia Valentinovna Gorbatova; RANEPA. Saint Petersburg, 2004. 160 p.

7. Goryeva, T.M. Political Censorship in the USSR: 1917-1991. 2 ed. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), 2009.

8. Iggers, G. Review of History and Truth. In: The American Political Science Review. New York: State University of New York, 1966. P. 118.

9. Levchenko, Y. Neprikosnovennyj zapas, 2005, No. 2-3, pp. 40-41 – Review: The Past Is a Foreign Country. Lowenthal D.; transl. by A.V. Govorunov. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. 624 p.

10. Lukin, A.V.; Lukin, P.V. Myths of Russia’s Political Culture and Russian History // Polis, 2009, No. 2, pp. 147-162.

11. Ricoeur, P. History and Truth. Northwestern University Press, 1965.

12. Ricoeur, P. Memory, History, Forgetting. University of Chicago Press, 2004.

13. Rudenko, Z.Y. Stereotypes of Political Power in Russia // Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University, 2007, No. 3, pp. 265-268.

14. Sogrin, V.V. Political History of Modern Russia. 1985-2001: From Gorbachev to Putin. 4 ed. Moscow: Ves’ Mir, 2001

15. Timofeeva, O. History and Truth Review // Neprikosnovennyi Zapas, 2005, No. 2-3.

16. Vyazemskiy, Y. Problem of Falsifi cation of Russian History and the General Historical Education: Theoretical and Practical Aspects // Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya, 2012, No. 1, pp. 28-43.