AUTHORITARIAN LIBERALISM IN CONTEMPORARY EUROPE: METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES AND CONCEPTUAL MODELS

The author conducts a comparative analysis of authoritarian liberalism’s concepts in contemporary political theory. The article deals with the main directions of interpretation of authoritarian liberalism in the framework of methodological approaches and conceptual models of neoliberalism, ordoliberalism, John Rawls' theory of political liberalism, Jan-Werner Mueller's “restrained democracy”, Jürgen Habermas' “legitimation crisis”, Colin Crouch's “post-democracy”, Michael Wilkinson's “de-democratization”, Crawford Macpherson's “participatory democracy”, Wolfgang Streeck's “democratic capitalism crisis”, Giandomenico Majone's «crypto-federalism». The basic analytical concept is the idea of   authoritarian economic liberalism, fi rst proposed by H. Heller and K. Polanyi. For the purpose of methodological refl ection, an analytical review of methods and concepts based on modern political and constitutional theory and used in the study of the institutional specifi cs of authoritarian liberalism has been carried out. Authoritarian liberalism is conceptualized as the neoliberal ideology and practice of de-democratization and restriction of democracy, which results in regionalization of protest against the supranational regime of liberal democracy and political integration in Europe. If authoritarian liberalism focuses on economic liberalism, then authoritarian ways of implementing policies are subject to the interests of private property: authoritarianism strengthens economic liberalism, which, in turn, reinforces the EU's “authoritarian transformation”. In the context of the Euro-crisis, authoritarian liberalism restricts traditional forms of representative democracy, political struggle, and the legitimation of power, contributing to the reanimation of ethnic nationalism. In contemporary Europe, right-wing euroskeptics are gaining popularity. The authoritarian-liberal restriction of social democracy can lead not only to the strengthening of capitalism, but also to the revival of the reactionary forms of «new nationalism» and authoritarian illiberalism. The EU is developing today in the “neo-colonial paradigm” in accordance with the relations between the core and the periphery between creditor countries and debtor countries. Transnational solidarity suppressed by authoritarian liberalism can become a democratically legitimate tool for resolving a fundamental confl ict between market capitalism and representative democracy

authoritarian liberalism, market capitalism, representative democracy, neoliberalism, ordoliberalism, political liberalism, economic liberalism, de-democratization, restrained democracy, post-democracy, ideology, legitimation, transnational solidarity, European integration

1. Alexander, L. Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 1998.

2. Althusser, L. On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. London: Verso, 2014. 320 р.

3. Barber, B. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.

4. Beck, U. German Europe. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2013.

5. Bruff, I. The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism // Rethinking Marxism, 2014, Vol. 26, Iss. 1, pp. 113-129.

6. Cristi, R. Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism: Strong State, Free Economy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1998.

7. Crouch, K. Postdemokratiia (Post-democracy). Moscow: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta – Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2010.

8. Crozier, M.; Huntington, S.; Watanuki, J. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press, 1975.

9. Friedrich, C. The Political Thought of Neo-liberalism // American Political Science Review, 1955, Vol. 49, pp. 77-96.

10. Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1996. P. 78;

11. Rawls, J. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. 1993.

12. Habermas, J. Problema legitimatsii pozdnego kapitalizma (The Problem of Legitimation of Late Capitalism). Moscow: Praksis, 2010.

13. Habermas, J. Raskoloty Zapad (The Divided West). Moscow: Ves’ Mir, 2008.

14. Habermas, J. The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2012.

15. Hailbronner, M. Tradition and Transformations: The Rise of German Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

16. Hayek, F. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge, 1960.

17. Heller, H. Authoritarian Liberalism? // European Law Journa, 2015, Vol. 21, Iss. 3.

18. Lane, D. Mirazh demokratii (The Mirage of Democracy) // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2014, No. 6.

19. Levakin, Igor V. Ob otchuzhdenii po obshchestvennomu dogovoru: komparativistskiy analiz osnovnykh chert aliyenatsii i dealiyenatsii v konstitutsiyakh burzhuaznodemokraticheskikh, sotsialisticheskikh, post sotsialisticheskikh i religioznykh gosudarstv (The Alienation along the Social Contract: Comparative Analysis of Basic Features of Alienation and Dealienation in the Constitutions of Burgium-democratic, Socialist, Post-socialist and Theocratic and Clerical States) // Comparative Politics Russia, 2019, No. 3, pp. 22-31.

20. Macpherson, C. The Real World of Democracy. Toronto: CBC Radio, 1966. Macpherson, C. Zhizn’ i vremena liberal’noi demokratii (The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy). Moscow: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta – Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2011.

21. Mair, P. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso, 2013.

22. Majone, G. Europe as the Would-be World Power: The EU at Fifty. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

23. Muller, J.-V. Spory o demokratii: Politicheskie idei v Evrope XX veka (The Debate about Democracy: Political Ideas in Europe of the XX Century). Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara, 2014.

24. Peregudov, S.P. Liberalizm XXI veka – krizis ili obnovleniye? (Liberalism of the XXI Century – a Crisis or an Update?) // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2015, №4.

25. Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 2001.

26. Popov, M.E. Sociocultural integration policy: main theoretical approaches (The Policy of Socio-Cultural Integration: Basic Theoretical Approaches) // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2017, №1.

27. Rawls, J. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

28. Sandel, M. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Allen Lane, 2012.

29. Scharpf, F. After the Crash: A Perspective on MultiLevel European Democracy // European Law Journal, 2015, Vol. 21.

30. Schmitter, P.; Karl, T. What Democracy Is... And Is Not. In: Global Resurgence of Democracy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1993.

31. Schumpeter, J. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York, London: Routledge, 2000.

32. Semenenko, I.S. Grazhdanskaya identichnost’ (Civic Identity) / Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoe izdanie (Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. An Encyclopedia). Ed. by I. Semenenko. Moscow: Ves MIR Publishers, 2017.

33. Streeck, W. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso, 2013.

34. Wilkinson, M. Authoritarian Liberalism in the European Constitutional Imagination: Second Time as Farce? // European Law Journal, 2015, Vol. 21, Iss. 3, pp. 313-339.

35. Zakaria, F. The Rise of Illiberal Democracy // Foreign Affairs, 1997, Vol. 76, Iss. 6, pp. 22-43.