TENSIONS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS FOR COMPARATIVE RESEARCH

The article is devoted to the theoretical interpretation of the concept of “tension” as a necessary prerequisite for its operationalization and transformation into a tool for applied comparative analysis. The increase of tensions in different regions and types of government, within and between countries is a refl ection of the profound changes that the modern world is undergoing. At the same time, the number of attempts at serious scientifi c understanding and conceptualization, as well as operationalization and measurement, remains extremely limited. The fi rst part of the article presents a brief review of previous studies on the phenomenon of “tension” in the context of world politics and international relations. The second part is devoted to a conceptual analysis of the phenomenon of “tension” as a special dynamic state that is present not only in competition (war) relations, but also in cooperation (peace) relations, and which, therefore, is a more common type of interstate interactions.

tension, world politics, international competition, international cooperation, war, confl ict, peace, partnership, comparative analysis

1. Antsulov, A.Ia.; Shipilov, A.I. Konfl iktologiia (Confl ictology). Moscow: IuNITI, 1999.

2. Buchanan, W. Stereotypes and Tensions as Revealed by UNESCO International Poll // International Sociological Science Bulletin, 1951, Vol. 3, No. 3.

3. Cantril, H. Tensions That Cause Wars. Urbana: University Illinois Press, 1951;

4. Krech, D.; Crutchfi eld, R.S. Theory and Problems of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill, 1948.

5. Davis, Christina L.; Meunier, Sophie. Business as Usual? Economic Responses to Political Tensions // American Journal of Political Science, 2011, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 628-646.

6. Goldmann, Kjell. Cooperation and Tension Among Great Powers: A Research Note // Cooperation and Confl ict, 1980, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 31-45.

7. Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza; Ghorbaninejad, Rebaz; Ahmadipour, Zahra; Ghavam, Abdolali. Tension and Confl ict Theories between Countries: Review, Critique and Presenting a Theoretical Model // Geopolitics Quarterly, 2014, Vol. 9, No. 4.

8. Hensel, Paul R. An Evolutionary Approach to the Study of Interstate Rivalry // Forthcoming in Confl ict Management and Peace Science, 1999, Vol. 17, No. 2.

9. Holsti, K.J. The Use of Objective Criteria for the Measurement of International Tension Levels // Background, 1963, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 77-95.

10. Holsti, O.R. The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study // Journal of Confl ict Resolution, 1962, Vol. 6, pp. 244-252.

11. Introduction. The UNESCO Tensions Project. In: The Nature of Confl ict. Studies on the Sociological Aspects of International Tensions. Вy the International Sociological Association in collaboration with Jessie Bernardt, T.H. Pear, Raymond Aron, Robert C. Angell. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization, 1957.

12. Jessie, Bernard. Chapter 1. The Sociological Study of Confl ict. In: The Nature of Confl ict. Studies on the Sociological Aspects of International Tensions. Paris: United Nations Educational. Scientifi c and Cultural Organization, 1957.

13. Kalevi Jaakko Holsti. Peace and War: Armed Confl icts and International Order, 1648-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

14. Kaplan, Morton A. The International Arena as a Source of Disfunctional Tension // World Politics, 1954, Vol. 6, No. 4.

15. Klineber, O. Tensions Affecting International Understanding. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1950.

16. Klingberg, F.L. Studies in Measurement of the Relations Among Sovereign States // Psychometrica, 1941, No. 6, pp. 335-352.

17. Krech, D.; Crutchfi eld, R.S. Theory and Problems of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill, 1948. Рр. 443-622.

18. Leifer, M. The Foreign Relations of the New States. Australia. Longman, 1974.

19. Pear, T.H. The Psychological Study of Tensions and Confl ict. In: The Nature of Confl ict. Studies on the Sociological Aspects of International Tensions. Paris: United Nations Educational. Scientifi c and Cultural Organization, 1957.

20. Rabush, T.V. Jevoljucija ideologicheskoj sostavljajushhej v sovetsko-amerikanskom protivoborstve v regional’nyh vooruzhennyh konfl iktah (1970-1980-e gody) (The Evolution of the Ideological Component in the Soviet-American Confrontation in Regional Armed Confl icts (1970-1980’s)) // Vestnik SPbGU. Politologija. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 75-85.

21. Tsygankov, P.A. Politicheskaia sotsiologiia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii (Political Sociology of International Relations). Moscow: Radiks, 1994.

22. William, R. Thompson. Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics // International Studies Quarterly, 2001, Vol. 45, Iss. 4, pp. 557-586.

23. Wright, Q. The Nature of Confl ict // Western Political Quarterly, 1951, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 193-208.

24. Wright, Q. The Peaceful Adjustment of International Relations: Problems and Research Approaches // Journal of Social Issues, 1955, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 3-12.

25. Zinnes, Dina A.; North, Robert C.; Koch, Howard E. Capability, Threat and the Outbreak of War. In: James N. Rosenau (ed.) International Politics and Foreign Policy. New York: Free Press, 1961. Pp. 469-482.