Preview

Comparative Politics Russia

Advanced search

HISTORY LESSONS: FEATURES OF THE SINO-SOVIET MANAGEMENT OF CER IN THE 1920’S

https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10027

Abstract

The article is devoted to the Sino-Soviet management of Chinese Eastern railway (CER), which still stays poorly studied, full of contradictions. Despite the variety of studies on the history of CER there is a number of questions that need clarification. What was CER for the USSR and China? Was the equal terms real, not nominal? How justified were the claims of the Soviet and Chinese sides to each other? On the basis of unpublished archival sources, (in particular, Russian State Historical Archive), the article examines the points of view of both the Soviet and Chinese sides on the activities and importance of the CER, analyzes the composition of the CER Board and Management, employees and workers with Soviet and Chinese citizenship, identifies cases of parity violation. The author comes to the conclusion that the joint Sino-Soviet management of CER faced a number of problems related to the political, social and cultural differences between the two countries, as well as the international and domestic political situation. Both sides suspected each other of violating parity and exceeding authority, and treated hierarchy issues differently. In addition to language difficulties and problems of intercultural communication, the unclear prospects of the USSR in Northern Manchuria and increased Chinese nationalism played a role. Nevertheless, both the Soviet and Chinese sides have shown themselves being pragmatists and realists, using various strategies to strengthen and keep power at the CER.

About the Author

M. V. Krotova
St. Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Maria V. Krotova

Dr. of History, Professor, Department of International Relations, Medialogy, Political Science and History



References

1. Ablazhei, N.N. Konfl ikt na KVZhD i ego posledstviya (The Conflict on the CER and Its Consequences) // Vestnik NGU, 2006, No. 5(1).

2. Ablova, N.E. KVZhD i rossiiskaya emigratsiya v Kitae: mezhdunarodnyye i politicheskie aspekty istorii (pervaya polovina XX veka) (CER and Russian Emigration in China: International and Political Aspects of History (The First half of the Twentieth Century)). Moscow: Russkaya panorama, 2005.

3. Alekseev, M.M. Sovetskaya voennaya razvedka v Kitae i khronika “kitaiskoi smuty” (1922-1929) (Soviet Military Intelligence in China and the Chronicle of the “Chinese Turmoil” (1922-1929)]. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole, 2010.

4. Besedovskii, G. Na putyach k termidoru (On the Way to Thermidor). Moscow: Sovremennik, 1997.

5. Datsyshen, V.G. «Konflikt na KVZhD 1926 g.» i «konflikt na KVZhD 1929 g.»: sravnitel’noistoricheskii analiz sovetskoi politiki (“The Confl ict on the CER in 1926” and “the Conflict on the CER 1929”: Comparative Analysis) // Comparative Politics Russia, 2018, No. 4, pp. 67-82.

6. Kriukov, V.M.; Kriukov, M.V. Vesna i osen’ revoliutsionnoi diplomatii: Pervoe desiatiletie sovetskoi politiki v Kitae. (Spring and Autumn of Revolutionary Diplomacy: The First Decade of Soviet Politics in China). Vol. 2.: 1922-1926. Moscow: Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2015.

7. Kriukov, V.M.; Kriukov, M.V. Vzryv, kotorogo zhdali, i ego echo (The Explosion, Which Was Expected, and Its Echo). Moscow: IV RAN, 2017. Krotova, M.V. Sovetskoe prisutstvie na KVZhD v 1924- 1935 gg. (The Soviet Presence in the CER in 1924-1935) // Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka, 2013, No. 1, pp. 139-150.

8. Molodyakov, V.E. Rossiya i Yaponiya: rel’sy gudyat. Zheleznodorozhnyi uzel rossiisko-yaponskikh otnoshenii (1891-1945) (Russia and Japan: the Rails are Humming. Railway Junction of Russian-Japanese Relations (1891- 1945)). Moscow: AST, 2006. 447 p.

9. Perepiska, I.V. Stalina i G.V. Chicherina s polpredom SSSR v Kitae L.M. Karakhanom: dokumenty, avgust 1923 g. - 1926 g. (Correspondence of J. Stalin and G.V. Chicherin with the Plenipotentiary Representative of the USSR in China L.M. Karakhan: Documents, August 1923- 1926). Ed. by A. I. Kartunova. Moscow: Natalis, 2008.

10. Pisarev, A.A. Sovetsko-kitaiskii konfl ikt 1929 goda: prichiny i posledstviya (The Soviet-Chinese Conflict of 1929: Causes and Consequences) / Sin’khaiskaya revolutsiya i respublikanskii Kitai: vek revolutsii, evolutsii i modernizatsii (Xinhai Revolution and Republican China: a Century of Revolutions, Evolutions and Modernizations). Moscow: IV RAN, 2013

11. Sistemnaia istoriia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v chetyrekh tomakh. Sobytiia i dokumenty (System History of International Relations in Four Volumes. Events and Documents) 1918-2000. Ed. by A.D. Bogaturov. V. 1. Moscow, 2000.

12. Sovetsko-kitaiskie otnosheniya, 1917-1957: sbornik dokumentov (Soviet-Chinese Relations, 1917-1957: Collection of Documents). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo vostochnoi litratury, 1959.

13. Uryadova, A.V. Rukovodstvo ROVS i sovetskokitaiskie otnosheniya vtoroi poloviny 1920 godov (ROVS Leadership and Soviet-Chinese Relations of the Second Half of the 1920’s) // Vestnik DVO RAN (Bulletin of DVO RAN), 2010, Vol. 2(150).

14. Yakhimovich, S.U. Sovetskie grazhdane v Severnoi Manchzhurii (1921-1935 gg.) (Soviet Citizens in Northern Manchuria (1924-1935)). Khabarovsk: DVUI MVD, 2015.


Review

For citations:


Krotova M.V. HISTORY LESSONS: FEATURES OF THE SINO-SOVIET MANAGEMENT OF CER IN THE 1920’S. Comparative Politics Russia. 2020;11(2):166-176. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10027

Views: 444


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2221-3279 (Print)
ISSN 2412-4990 (Online)