comparativepoliticsСравнительная политикаComparative Politics Russia2221-32792412-4990Издательская группа «Юрист»10.24411/2221-3279-2018-10003comparativepolitics-882Research ArticleСРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ КОНЦЕПЦИЙ И ИНСТИТУТОВCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTS AND INSTITUTIONSК ВОПРОСУ О МЕТОДОЛОГИИ ИСТОРИЧЕСКОГО ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ: ПРИМЕР ИЗУЧЕНИЯ ВНЕШНЕПОЛИТИЧЕСКОГО ПРОЦЕССА В ПОСЛЕВОЕННОЙ ЯПОНИИON THE QUESTION OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: THE CASE OF STUDYING FOREIGN POLICY DECISION MAKING IN POST-WAR JAPANНелидовВ. В.NelidovV. V.

аспирант, преподаватель, кафедра востоковедения; научный сотрудник, Центр японских исследований.

Москва.

Postgraduate student, Assistant Lecturer, Department of Asian and African Studies; Researcher, Center for Japanese Studies.

Moscow.

vladimir.nelidov@gmail.comМосковский государственный институт международных отношений (Университет) МИД России; Институт востоковедения Российской академии наук.РоссияMGIMO University; Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.Russian Federation20183110201894В номере "Китай и внешняя политика"4150Copyright © Нелидов В.В., 20182018Нелидов В.В.Nelidov V.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/882

В статье рассматриваются различные варианты теоретических подходов к историческому исследованию на примере анализа внешнеполитического процесса в Японии в годы пребывания у власти Либерально-демократической партии в1955-1993 гг. (период «системы1955 года»). Эти подходы классифицируются по степени их генерализуемости. Разница в методологических подходах соответствует различию в эпистемологических позициях, в частности, представлениям о возможности и целесообразности поиска закономерностей, существующих вне зависимости от культурно-исторического контекста. Делается вывод, что понимание сильных и слабых сторон подходов, а также того, какие цели могут ставиться в их рамках, имеет существенное значение для методологии внешнеполитического исследования.

The article examines different variants of theoretical approaches to historical research, using the example of the analysis of foreign policy decision making in Japan during the rule of the Liberal Democratic Party (the “1955 system” period). These approaches are sorted by the degree of their generalizability. The difference in methodological approaches corresponds to the variation of epistemological positions, particularly, to the evaluations of possibility and usefulness of searching for regularities, existing irrespective of cultural and historical context. The conclusion is drawn that understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each of these approaches, as well as of the goals that can be set within their boundaries has significant importance for historical methodology.

методологияэпистемологиятеорияЯпониявнешнеполитический процесс«система 1955 года»новейшая историяmethodologyepistemologytheoryJapanforeign policy decision making“1955 system”contemporary historyReferencesБродель Ф. Очерки истории. – М.: Академический проект; Альма Матер, 20 ьцова. – М.: Аспект Пресс, 2011. – С. 306-336.Allison, G. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis //The American Political Science Review, 1969, Vol. 63, No. 3.Стрельцов Д.В. Система государственного управления Японии в послевоенный период. – М.: МАКС Пресс, 2002. – 304 с.Braudel, F. Ocherki istorii (On History). Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt; Al’ma Mater, 2015.Стрельцов Д.В. Система доминантной партии в Японии: некоторые уроки исторического опыта// Японские исследования. – 2016. – №3.Campbell, J.; Scheiner, E. Fragmentation and Power: Reconceptualizing Policy Making under Japan’s 1955 System //Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2008, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 89-113.Allison, G. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis // The American Political Science Review, 1969, Vol 63, No. 3.Curtis, G.The Logic of Japanese Politics. Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Campbell, J.; Scheiner, E.Fragmentation and Power: Reconceptualizing Policy Making under Japan’s 1955 System // Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2008, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 89-113.Drohan, T.American-Japanese Security Agreements, Past and Present. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2007. 214 p.Curtis, G.The Logic of Japanese Politics. Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Hagan, J.et al. Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy / J. Hagan, P. Everts, H. Fukui, J. Stempel // International Studies Review, 2001,Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 169-216.Drohan, T.American-Japanese Security Agreements, Past and Present. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2007. 214 p.King, G. et al. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research / G. King, R. Keohane, S. Verba. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Hagan, J. et al. Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy / J. Hagan, P. Everts, H. Fukui, J. Stempel // International Studies Review,2001,Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 169-216.Merton, R. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press, 1968.King, G. et al. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research / G. King, R. Keohane, S. Verba. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Minor, M.Decision Models and Japanese Foreign Policy Decision Making / M. Minor // Asian Survey,1985, Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 1229-1241.Merton, R.Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press, 1968.Panov, A.N.Diplomaticheskaya sluzhba Yaponii i evolyutsiya yapono-sovetskikh i yapono-rossiiskikh otnoshenii v poslevoennyi period (1945-1995 gg.) (Japanese Diplomatic Service and the Evolution of JapanSoviet and Japan-Russian Relations in the Post-War Period (1945-1995)). Moscow: MGIMO, 1994. 94 p.Minor, M. Decision Models and Japanese Foreign Policy Decision Making / M. Minor // Asian Survey,1985, Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 229-1241.Panov, A.N. Yaponskaya diplomaticheskaya sluzhba (Japanese Diplomatic Service). Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 1988. 184 p.Przeworski, A.; Teune, H.The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Pub. Co., 1982.Przeworski, A.; Teune, H. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Pub. Co., 1982.Rosenblueth, A.; Wiener, N. The Role of Models in Science // Philosophy of Science, 1945, No. 4.Rosenblueth, A.; Wiener, N.The Role of Models in Science // Philosophy of Science, 1945, No. 4.Strel’tsov D.V. Sistema gosudarstvennogo upravleniya Yaponii v poslevoennyi period (The System of Public Administration of Japan in the Post-War Period). Moscow: MAKS Press, 2002. 304 p.Strel’tsov D.V. Sistema gosudarstvennogo upravleniya Yaponii v poslevoennyi period (The System of Public Administration of Japan in the Post-War Period). Moscow: MAKS Press, 2002. 304 p.Strel’tsov, D.V.Sistema dominantnoi partii v Yaponii: nekotorye uroki istoricheskogo opyta (The Dominant Party System in Japan: Some Lessons of Historical Experience) // Yaponskie issledovaniya (Japanese Studies in Russia), 2016, No. 3.Strel’tsov, D.V.Sistema dominantnoi partii v Yaponii: nekotorye uroki istoricheskogo opyta (The Dominant Party System in Japan: Some Lessons of Historical Experience) // Yaponskie issledovaniya (Japanese Studies in Russia), 2016, No. 3.Strel’tsov, D.V.Vneshnepoliticheskii protsess v sovremennoi Yaponii (The Foreign Policy Process in Contemporary Japan) // Vneshnepoliticheskii protsess v stranakh Vostoka (The Foreign Policy Process in the Countries of the East). Ed. by D.V. Strel’tsov. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2011. Pp. 306-336.Strel’tsov, D.V.Vneshnepoliticheskii protsess v sovremennoi Yaponii (The Foreign Policy Process in Contemporary Japan) // Vneshnepoliticheskii protsess v stranakh Vostoka (The Foreign Policy Process in the Countries of the East). Ed. by D.V. Strel’tsov. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2011. Pp. 306-336.Yoshida, S.Nichibei do:mei no seidoka. Hatten to shinka no rekishi katei (The Institutionalization of the Japan-US Alliance. The Historical Process of Development and Deepening). Nagoya: Nagoya daigaku shuppankai, 2012. 424 p.Yoshida, S.Nichibei do:mei no seidoka. Hatten to shinka no rekishi katei (The Institutionalization of the Japan-US Alliance. The Historical Process of Development and Deepening). Nagoya: Nagoya daigaku shuppankai, 2012. 424 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.