comparativepoliticsСравнительная политикаComparative Politics Russia2221-32792412-4990Издательская группа «Юрист»comparativepolitics-676Research ArticleДЕМОКРАТИЯ В РОССИЙСКОМ ЗЕРКАЛЕDEMOCRACY IN THE MIRROR OF THE RUSSIANThe origins and traditions of the information policy in RussiaThe origins and traditions of the information policy in RussiaМарковЕвгений АлфеевичMarkovEvgeny Alfeevich

Гуманитарный институт, кафедра связей с общественностью, журналистики и рекламы, 2055-5778

Doctor of Science (Politics), Professor

marevgeny@inbox.ruЧереповецкий государственный университетРоссияThe Cherepovets State UniversityRussian Federation201930032020101В номере "Информационно-правовая политика"676Copyright © Марков Е.А., 20182018Марков Е.А.Markov E.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/676

For a long time the activities of mass media in Russia have been largely determined, and are still being determined now, by the state authorities. The state controls the activities of the information impact subjects, considering information resources, on an equal basis with other resources, to be important links that connect the multinational people into a single unity, and to remain one of the sources of the strength and power of the country.

The author of the article, showing the changes that have taken place in the interaction between the state authorities and the media during three centuries of Russian history, expresses the idea of the inevitability of the active presence and control of the government institutions of the communicative and information field of the country, being an important factor ensuring the development of Russia, which conducts an independent external and internal policy and protects not only its national interests, but also the interests of a number of other countries.

For a long time the activities of mass media in Russia have been largely determined, and are still being determined now, by the state authorities. The state controls the activities of the information impact subjects, considering information resources, on an equal basis with other resources, to be important links that connect the multinational people into a single unity, and to remain one of the sources of the strength and power of the country.

The author of the article, showing the changes that have taken place in the interaction between the state authorities and the media during three centuries of Russian history, expresses the idea of the inevitability of the active presence and control of the government institutions of the communicative and information field of the country, being an important factor ensuring the development of Russia, which conducts an independent external and internal policy and protects not only its national interests, but also the interests of a number of other countries.

information spherestate controlmass mediagovernmentsocietyinformation spherestate controlmass mediagovernmentsocietyReferencesAnohin M.G., Demidov F.D., Kononenko A.V. and jthers. Technologies in politics and political and administrative management. – М., 2005.Anohin M.G., Demidov F.D., Kononenko A.V. and jthers. Technologies in politics and political and administrative management. – М., 2005.Budancev Y.P. Systematic in the study of mass information processes. - M.: 1986.Budancev Y.P. Systematic in the study of mass information processes. - M.: 1986.Buxton W.J., Bardini T. Tracing Innis and McLuhan // Canadian Journal of Communications. – 2012. – Vol. 37 – N 4Buxton W.J., Bardini T. Tracing Innis and McLuhan // Canadian Journal of Communications. – 2012. – Vol. 37 – N 4‘Decree on the Press’ 1972, O partiynoy i sovetskoy pechati, radioveshchanii i televidenii: collection, Moscow, (in Russian).‘Decree on the Press’ 1972, O partiynoy i sovetskoy pechati, radioveshchanii i televidenii: collection, Moscow, (in Russian).Dubin, BV 2005, ‘MEDIA late Soviet and post-Soviet era: the evolution of functions and population estimates’, Puti Rossii: dvadtsat' let peremen : materialy Mezhdunar. simp. (20–22 yanvarya 2005 g.), Moscow, pp. 250-263, (in Russian).Dubin, BV 2005, ‘MEDIA late Soviet and post-Soviet era: the evolution of functions and population estimates’, Puti Rossii: dvadtsat' let peremen : materialy Mezhdunar. simp. (20–22 yanvarya 2005 g.), Moscow, pp. 250-263, (in Russian).Dushkov B.A. Noopsychosociology of peoples and eras (archetypal classification). – М., 2001.Dushkov B.A. Noopsychosociology of peoples and eras (archetypal classification). – М., 2001.Dzialoshinski I.M. Mass media, power and civil society in the region . – М: 2002;Dzialoshinski I.M. Mass media, power and civil society in the region . – М: 2002;Esin, BI 2000, The history of Russian journalism (1703-1917), Moscow, (in Russian).Esin, BI 2000, The history of Russian journalism (1703-1917), Moscow, (in Russian).Fedorkina A.P. The phenomenon of consciousness in the context of psychoanalysis. – М., 1997.Fedorkina A.P. The phenomenon of consciousness in the context of psychoanalysis. – М., 1997.Golovko B.N. Information management of mass communication. – М., 2005.Golovko B.N. Information management of mass communication. – М., 2005.Gorky, M 2000, ‘Book about Russian men’, Gor'kiy M. Nesvoyevremennyye mysli, Moscow, p. 576, (in Russian).Gorky, M 2000, ‘Book about Russian men’, Gor'kiy M. Nesvoyevremennyye mysli, Moscow, p. 576, (in Russian).Grabelnikov A.A. Russian journalism at the turn of the millennium. Results and prospects. – M., 2000.Grabelnikov A.A. Russian journalism at the turn of the millennium. Results and prospects. – M., 2000.Innis H.A. The bias of communication. – Toronto etc., 2003, p. 76.Innis H.A. The bias of communication. – Toronto etc., 2003, p. 76.Kablukov V.E. Deformation of Reality in the Modern Russian Media Discourse // Izvestiya Ural Federal University. Series 1: The problems of education, science and culture. – 2015. Vol. 138. № 2. - P. 43- 51.Kablukov V.E. Deformation of Reality in the Modern Russian Media Discourse // Izvestiya Ural Federal University. Series 1: The problems of education, science and culture. – 2015. Vol. 138. № 2. - P. 43- 51.Kara-Murza S. Soviet civilization. (In two books). – М., 2002.Kara-Murza S. Soviet civilization. (In two books). – М., 2002.Karpuhin O.I., Makarevich E.F. Влияние на человека: Influence on man: Historical and sociological view. – М., 2000;Karpuhin O.I., Makarevich E.F. Влияние на человека: Influence on man: Historical and sociological view. – М., 2000;Konovchenko S.V., Kiselev A.G. Information policy in Russia: Monograph. – М: RAGS, 2004.Konovchenko S.V., Kiselev A.G. Information policy in Russia: Monograph. – М: RAGS, 2004.Kozlova O. Problems of interaction between state authorities and mass media / Economy and society. - 2016. № 4-2 (23). - P. 784-788.Kozlova O. Problems of interaction between state authorities and mass media / Economy and society. - 2016. № 4-2 (23). - P. 784-788.Lediaev V.G. Power: conceptual analysis // Policy. 2000. № 1.Lediaev V.G. Power: conceptual analysis // Policy. 2000. № 1.Mass Media and American Politics. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1995. P. 27-34.Mass Media and American Politics. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1995. P. 27-34.Mutilina K.O. Contemporary media action: where the pendulum leans? "// Politics, Economics and Innovation. - 2016. № 5 (7). - P. 4.Mutilina K.O. Contemporary media action: where the pendulum leans? "// Politics, Economics and Innovation. - 2016. № 5 (7). - P. 4.Nisnevich Y.A. Information and power. – М., 2000.Nisnevich Y.A. Information and power. – М., 2000.Ong J. Walter. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New. York: Methuen, 1982, p. 201Ong J. Walter. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New. York: Methuen, 1982, p. 201Panarin A. The temptation of globalism. – М., 2002;Panarin A. The temptation of globalism. – М., 2002;Poberezhskaya М. Communicating climate change in Russia: state and propaganda//Communicating Climate Change in Russia: State and Propaganda. - 2015. - P. 1-167.Poberezhskaya М. Communicating climate change in Russia: state and propaganda//Communicating Climate Change in Russia: State and Propaganda. - 2015. - P. 1-167.Pochepcov G. Classical media theories: Garold Innis // Media sapiens. URL: http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/ethics/manipulation/klassicheskie_mediateorii (date of the application 03.03.2017).Pochepcov G. Classical media theories: Garold Innis // Media sapiens. URL: http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/ethics/manipulation/klassicheskie_mediateorii (date of the application 03.03.2017).Poe M.T. A history of communications. – Cambridge, 2011Poe M.T. A history of communications. – Cambridge, 2011Political Communications / Ed. prof. A.I. Soloviev. – М., 2004.Political Communications / Ed. prof. A.I. Soloviev. – М., 2004.Popov V.D. Informiology and Information Policy. – М., 2003.Popov V.D. Informiology and Information Policy. – М., 2003.Popov V.D. State information policy: the state and problems of formation // Mass information processes in Russia. – М: RAGS, 2002.Popov V.D. State information policy: the state and problems of formation // Mass information processes in Russia. – М: RAGS, 2002.Postman, N. Amusing Ourselves to Death. Penguin Books. 1985. In: Vermeer Jan. P. In "Media" Res: Readings inPostman, N. Amusing Ourselves to Death. Penguin Books. 1985. In: Vermeer Jan. P. In "Media" Res: Readings inProhorov E.P. Journalism and democracy. Theoretical essays .– М., 2001.Prohorov E.P. Journalism and democracy. Theoretical essays .– М., 2001.Radzinsky, E 2003, Napoleon: life after death, Moscow, p. 336, (in Russian).Radzinsky, E 2003, Napoleon: life after death, Moscow, p. 336, (in Russian).Romanov V.L. Social self-organization and statehood. - M., 2003.Romanov V.L. Social self-organization and statehood. - M., 2003.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.