<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">comparativepolitics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сравнительная политика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comparative Politics Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2221-3279</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-4990</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Издательская группа «Юрист»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-119-129</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">comparativepolitics-655</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МАТЕРИАЛЫ ДЛЯ ДИСКУССИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DISCUSSION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Психологическое состояние российского общества между парламентскими и президентскими выборами: cравнительный анализ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Psychological Status of Russian Society between the Latest Parliamentary and the Future Presidential Elections: A Comparative Analysis</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шестопал</surname><given-names>Е. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shestopal</surname><given-names>Elena B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.филос.н., профессор, заведующая Кафедрой социологии и психологии политики, Факультет политологии</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Political Sociology and Psychology, the Faculty of Political Science</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">shestop0505@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>05</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>Трансрегионализм и регионализм в «постзападном мире»</issue-title><fpage>119</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Шестопал Е.Б., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Шестопал Е.Б.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shestopal E.B.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/655">https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/655</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье анализируются результаты исследования психологического состояния общества перед парламентскими выборами 2016 года в России и после них. Исследование показало, что ряд параметров остается неизменным достаточно длительное время (представления о справедливости, ряд политических ценностей, степень влиятельности Президента Путина). В то время, как другие показатели претерпевают существенную трансформацию, в том числе и в результате парламентских выборов. Инерционный характер кампании, дав власти тактический успех, привел к определенной политической демобилизации общества. В глазах опрошенных снизилось влияние Премьера, Администрации Президента, Государственной Думы, губернаторов, муниципальной власти, судов, прокуратуры и политических партий. В то же время, хотя и незначительно, усилилось политическое влияние Совета Федерации, правительства, силовых структур и армии.Обращает на себя внимание резкое снижение радикальных взглядов и усиление консервативного тренда после парламентских выборов.Таким образом, успех «Единой России» выглядит еще более убедительным. Одновременно можно говорить и о росте левых настроений, поскольку увеличилось число сторонников социалистических и коммунистических идей. После выборов российские граждане стали более положительно оценивать власть. Новым трендом стало снижение традиционных персонифицированных образов власти и рост значения в них партий и групп, хотя после выборов все партии получили снижение оценок их влияния. Можно предположить, что произошло привыкание к сложившейся партийной системе. Запрос на партийно-политическое представительство говорит об укоренении в массовом сознании ценностей формальной демократии.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Paper presents the data from the study of psychological status of Russian society. As the study has shown a number of psychological parameters (concepts of justice, some political values, the level of infl uence of President Putin in public mentality) preserves rather consistent for a long time. Other indicators are transformed substantially under the infl uence of some factors including elections. Inertial character of the last elections gave tactical victory for authorities but caused political demobilization of Russian society. Respodents’ images of Prime Minister, Presidential Administration, State Duma, governors, municipal power, courts, procurators and political parties substantially declined after 2016 elections. At the same time one could see the increase of the infl uence of the Council of Federation, security agencies and intelligence service. It also should be noticed that a radical views substantially declined as the conservative trend increased. It means that success of the United Russia was proved. At the same time one can speak about a clear growth of the left moods as the growth of the socialist and communist ideas was fi xed in this study. Elections improved the image of authorities: respondents evaluate them more positively now. There is a new trend of decline of traditionally personifi ed images of authority and the growth of the infl uence of political parties and groups though all the parties have lost their infl uence. One can suggest that citizens got used to this party system. The demand to have a formal party representation proves that values of formal democracy have been rooted in mass mentality.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>психологическое состояние общества</kwd><kwd>образы власти и лидеров</kwd><kwd>парламентские и президентские выборы в России</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>psychological status of the society</kwd><kwd>images of authority and leaders</kwd><kwd>parliamentary and presidential elections in Russia</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Задорин И.В. Качество и качества власти: восприятие населения // Полития. – 2005. – № 2. – С. 96-115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caplan, B. Rational Ignorance versus Rational Irrationality // Kyklo, 2001, Vol. 54. No. 1, pp. 3-26.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лапкин В.В., Семененко И.С. «Человек политический» перед вызовами «infomodernity» // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2013. – № 6. – С. 64-81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Feldman, S.; Conover, P.J. Candidates, Issues and Voters. The Role of Inference in Political Perception // Journal of Politics, 1983, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 810-839.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Преснякова Л.А. Структура личностного восприятия политической власти // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2000. – № 4. – С. 135-139.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Granberg, D., Kasmer, J., Nanneman, T. An Empirical Examination of Two Theories of Political Perception // Political Research Quarterly, 1988, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 29-46.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шестопал Е. Образы власти в эпоху перемен (Психологическая трансформация общества в постсоветской России) / Четверть века после СССР: люди, общество, реформы. – М.: Издательство МГУ, 2015. – С. 291-330.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fiske, S.; Neuberg, S.N. A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Infl uences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (ed. by M.P. Zanna). New York: Academic Press, 1990, Vol. 23, pp. 1-74.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шестопал Е.Б. Путин 3.0. Общество и власть в новейшей истории России. – М., Аргамак-Медиа, 2015. – С. 49-79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">King Pu-tsung. The Press, Candidate Images, and Voter Perceptions. in Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory (ed. by M. McCombs, D.L. Shaw, D. Weaver). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1997. Pp. 31-32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caplan, B. Rational Ignorance versus Rational Irrationality // Kyklo, 2001, Vol. 54. No. 1, pp. 3-26.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lapkin, V.V.; Semenenko, I.A. “Chelovek Politicheskii” pered vyzovamy “infomodernity” (”Homo Politicus” in the Face of “Infomodernity” Challenges) // Polis. Poiticheskie issledovaniya, 2013, No. 6, С. 64-81.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Granberg, D., Kasmer, J., Nanneman, T. An Empirical Examination of Two Theories of Political Perception // Political Research Quarterly, 1988, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 29-46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Presnyakova, L.A. Struktura lichnostnogo vospriyatiya politicheskoi vlasti (Structure of Personal Perception of Political Authority) // Polis, Political studies, 2000, No. 4, pp. 135-139.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feldman, S.; Conover, P.J. Candidates, Issues and Voters. The Role of Inference in Political Perception // Journal of Politics, 1983, Vol.45, No. 4, pp. 810-839.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shestopal, E. Obrazy vlasti v epokhu peremen (Psikhologicheskaia transformatsiia obshchestva v postsovetskoi Rossii) (Images of Authorities during Time of Change (Psychological Transformation of Society in Post-Soviet Russia)) / Chetvert’ veka posle SSSR: liudi, obshchestvo, reformy. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU, 2015. Pp. 291-330.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fiske, S.; Neuberg, S.N. A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Infl uences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (ed. by M.P. Zanna). New York: Academic Press, 1990, Vol. 23, pp. 1-74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shestopal, Elena. New Trends in Russian Political Mentality / Putin 3.0. Lexington books, 2016. Pp. 37-67.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">King Pu-tsung. The Press, Candidate Images, and Voter Perceptions. in Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory (ed. by M. McCombs, D.L. Shaw, D. Weaver). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1997. Pp. 31-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sniderman, P.M.; Brody, R.A.; Tetlock, P.E. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press. 1993. 324 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sniderman, P.M.; Brody, R.A.; Tetlock, P.E. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press. 1993. 324 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sullivan, J.L.; Oxendine, A.; Borgida, E.; Riedel, E.; Jackson, M.; Dial, J. The Importance of Political Context for Understanding Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis // Political Behavior, 2007 March, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 31-67.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sullivan, J.L.; Oxendine, A.; Borgida, E.; Riedel, E.; Jackson, M.; Dial, J. The Importance of Political Context for Understanding Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis // Political Behavior, 2007 March, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 31-67.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zadorin, I.V. Kachestvo i kachestva vlasti (Quality and Qualities of Power: Popular Perception) // Politeia, 2005, No. 2, pp. 96-115.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
