comparativepoliticsСравнительная политикаComparative Politics Russia2221-32792412-4990Издательская группа «Юрист»10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-1-58-76comparativepolitics-576Research ArticleСРАВНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА И ГЕОПОЛИТИКАCOMPARATIVE POLITICS AND GEOPOLITICSЕвразийство и евразийская интеграция в политической идеологии и практике ТурцииEurasianism and eurasian integration in the political ideologies and practice of TurkeyШлыковП. В.ShlykovPavel V.

Кафедра истории стран Ближнего и Среднего Востока, Институт стран Азии и Африки

Middle East History Department, Institute of Asian and African Studies

Candidate of History, Associate Professor

shlykov@iaas.msu.ruМосковский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова, г. МоскваРоссияMoscow State University, MoscowRussian Federation201711122016815876Copyright © Шлыков П.В., 20162016Шлыков П.В.Shlykov P.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/576

Аннотация: В статье в сравнительной перспективе анализируется трансформация евразийства как геополитического концепта и динамика отношения турецкой политической элиты к идеям евразийской интеграции в 1990-е и 2000-е гг. Для Турции, как и для России – географическая составляющая понятия «Евразии» и «евразийства» не выступает доминантной характеристикой этого концепта. В турецкой общественно-политической мысли евразийство уникальным образом объединило в себе черты разных идеологий – пантюркизма, панисламизма, тюркизма и неоосманизма – каждая из которых предлагала для Турции свой путь к региональному лидерству. В рамках полифонии трактовок и подходов к евразийству в Турции содержательно оформились два магистральных направления – концепт Евразии как географического мета-пространства и турецкие версии евразийской/неоевразийской идеологии. Географическое понятие Евразии стало использоваться в разных конфигурациях (в частности, Афро-Евразия) чаще всего для обозначения особой «центральной» роли Турции в обширном регионе, объединяющем пространство современного Ближнего и Среднего Востока, Балкан, Центральной Азии и Кавказа. Тем самым концепт Евразии стал универсальным инструментом в руках общественных деятелей и политиков, которые стремились доказать «исключительное геополитическое значение» Турции для глобальной мир-системы.

Abstract: The papers analyses transformations of Turkish Eurasianism as a geopolitical concept and attitudes of Turkish political elite towards ideas of Eurasian integration in the 1990s and fi rst decade of the 2000s in comparative perspective. For both Russia and Turkey the geographical dimensions of Eurasia and Eurasianism itself has never been a core characteristic of this concept. In the Turkish socio-political thought Eurasianism combined features of different ideologies (Pan-Turkism, Pan-Islamism, Turkism and Neo-Ottomanism), which offer diverse strategies for Turkey’s regional leadership. Within this polyphony of interpretations and approaches towards Eurasianism in Turkey two theoretical trends became the most prevailing: the fi rst one is a concept of Eurasia as a geographical meta-region, the second one comprises various Turkish versions of Eurasian / Neo-Eurasian ideologies. Turkish politicians and ideologists began to use geographical concept of Eurasia in different confi gurations (like Afro-Eurasia) mostly to defi ne the special “central” role of Turkey in the vast region of modern Middle East, the Balkans, Central Asia, and the Caucasus. Thus the concept of Eurasia became a universal instrument for both politicians and public intellectuals trying to prove the exceptional geopolitical signifi cance of Turkey for the global world-system.

ТурцияРоссиягеополитикаевразийствопантюркизмнеоосманизмисламизмполитическая культурTurkeyRussiageopoliticsEurasianismPan-TurkismNeo-OttomanismIslamismpolitical cultureReferencesКиреев Н.Г. Российско-турецкие отношения в контексте евразийских концепций / Российско-турецкие отношения: история, современное состояние и перспективы. – М.: Институт востоковедения РАН, 2003. – С. 247-248.Acar, Özgen. Ankara-Moskova-Orta Asya Stratejik Üçgeni // Cumhuriyet, 11/09/2001.Маккиндер X. Дж. Географическая ось истории // Полис. – 1995. – № 4. – c. 162-170.Akçalı, Emel; Perinçek, Mehmet. Kemalist Eurasianism: An Emerging Geopolitical Discourse in Turkey // Geopolitics, 2009, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, pp. 550-569.Уразова Е.И. Турция сегодня: экономическое сотрудничество со странами Южного Кавказа и Центральной Азии. – М.: Ин-т востоковедения РАН, 2012 – 278 с.Altunışık, Meliha B.; Martin, Lenore G. Making Sense of Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East under AKP // Turkish Studies, 2011, Vol. 12, Iss. 4, pp. 569-587.Шлыков П.В. Военная элита в политической системе Турецкой Республики // Элиты стран Востока. – М.: Ключ-С, 2011. – С. 31-60.Aras, Bülent. Turkey’s Policy in the Former Soviet South: Assets and Options // Turkish Studies, 2000, Vol. 1, Iss. 1.Шлыков П.В. Куда идет Турция: метаморфозы прозападного курса развития // Современная Европа. – №1 (53), январь-март 2013. – с. 58-75.Aras, Bülent; Fidan, Hakan. Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination // New Perspectives on Turkey, 2009, No. 40, pp. 202-203.Acar, Özgen. Ankara-Moskova-Orta Asya Stratejik Üçgeni // Cumhuriyet, 11/09/2001. Akçalı, Emel; Perinçek, Mehmet. Kemalist Eurasianism: An Emerging Geopolitical Discourse in Turkey // Geopolitics, 2009, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, pp. 550-569.Avraysa sekilleniyor // Milliyet, 1/11/1992. Aydın, M. Turkey and Central Asia: Challenges of Change // Central Asian Survey, 1996, Vol. 2, Iss. 15.Altunışık, Meliha B.; Martin, Lenore G. Making Sense of Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East under AKP // Turkish Studies, 2011, Vol. 12, Iss. 4, pp. 569-587.Balcı, Bayram. Fethullah Gülen’s Missionary Schools in Central Asia and their Role in the Spreading of Turkism and Islam // Religion, State and Society, 2003, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 151-177.Aras, Bülent. Turkey’s Policy in the Former Soviet South: Assets and Options // Turkish Studies, 2000, Vol. 1, Iss. 1. Aras, Bülent; Fidan, Hakan. Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination // New Perspectives on Turkey, 2009, No. 40, pp. 202-203.Baran, Zeyno. The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Implications for Turkey // The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Oil Window to the West. Front Cover. S. Frederick Starr, Svante E. Cornell. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, 2005. Pp. 103-118.Avraysa sekilleniyor // Milliyet, 1/11/1992. Aydın, M. Turkey and Central Asia: Challenges of Change // Central Asian Survey, 1996, Vol. 2, Iss. 15.Bilgin, Pınar. A Return to “Civilizational Geopolitics” in the Mediterranean? Changing Geo-Political Images of the European Union and Turkey in the Post-Cold War Era // Geopolitics, 2004, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 269-291.Balcı, Bayram. Fethullah Gülen’s Missionary Schools in Central Asia and their Role in the Spreading of Turkism and Islam // Religion, State and Society, 2003, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 151-177.Bilgin, Pınar. Only Strong States Can Survive in Turkey’s Geography: The Uses of “Geopolitical Truths” in Turkey // Political Geography, 2007, Vol. 26, Iss. 7, pp. 748-749.Baran, Zeyno. The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Implications for Turkey // The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Oil Window to the West. Front Cover. S. Frederick Starr, Svante E. Cornell. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, 2005. Pp. 103-118.Bu sistem “Yeni Avrasyacılık” değil “Yeni Avrusyacılık”tır / Zaman, 10/12/2004.Bilgin, Pınar. A Return to “Civilizational Geopolitics” in the Mediterranean? Changing Geo-Political Images of the European Union and Turkey in the Post-Cold War Era // Geopolitics, 2004, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 269-291.Çağaptay, Soner. The AKP’s Foreign Policy: The Misnomer of “Neo-Ottomanism” // Turkey Analyst, 2009, Vol. 2, No. 8. Mode of access: http://www.turkeyanalyst. org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/item/164-the-akps￾foreign-policy-the-misnomer-of-neo-ottomanism.htmlBilgin, Pınar. Only Strong States Can Survive in Turkey’s Geography: The Uses of “Geopolitical Truths” in Turkey // Political Geography, 2007, Vol. 26, Iss. 7, pp. 748-749.Çeçen, Anıl. Türkiye ve Avrasya. Ankara: Fark, 2006. Cem, İsmail. Turkey in the New Century: speeches and texts (1995-2001) / İsmail Cem. Rustem: Nicosia, Mersin 2001. P. 60.Bu sistem “Yeni Avrasyacılık” değil “Yeni Avrusyacılık”tır / Zaman, 10/12/2004. Çağaptay, Soner. The AKP’s Foreign Policy: The Misnomer of “Neo-Ottomanism” // Turkey Analyst, 2009, Vol. 2, No. 8. Mode of access: http://www. turkeyanalyst.org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/ item/164-the-akps-foreign-policy-the-misnomer-of-neo-ottomanism.htmlCriss, Nur Bilge. Dismantling Turkey: The Will of the People? // Turkish Studies, 2010, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 45-58.Çeçen, Anıl. Türkiye ve Avrasya. Ankara: Fark, 2006. Cem, İsmail. Turkey in the New Century: speeches and texts (1995-2001) / İsmail Cem. Rustem: Nicosia, Mersin 2001. P. 60. Criss, Nur Bilge. Dismantling Turkey: The Will of the People? // Turkish Studies, 2010, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 45-58.Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Stratejik Derinlik / Ahmet Davutoğlu. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2001, s. 52-58.Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Stratejik Derinlik / Ahmet Davutoğlu. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2001, s. 52-58.Davutoglu, Ahmet. Stratejik Derinlik: Tü rkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu / Ahmet Davutoglu. İ stanbul: Kü re Yayınları, 2001. 584 s.Davutoglu, Ahmet. Stratejik Derinlik: Tü rkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu / Ahmet Davutoglu. İ stanbul: Kü re Yayınları, 2001. 584 s.Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Türkiye Merkez Ülke Olmalı // Radikal, 26/02/2004. Mode of Access: http://www.radikal. com.tr/haber.php?haberno=107581 Defense White Paper 2000. Mode of access: http:// mercury.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/154907/ ipublicationdocument_singledocument/8be48d28-5065- 40d4-a82c-8f001350113e/en/Turkey_2000eng.pdfDavutoğlu, Ahmet. Türkiye Merkez Ülke Olmalı // Radikal, 26/02/2004. Mode of Access: http://www.radikal. com.tr/haber.php?haberno=107581 Defense White Paper 2000. Mode of access: http:// mercury.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/154907/ ipublicationdocument_singledocument/8be48d28-5065- 40d4-a82c-8f001350113e/en/Turkey_2000eng.pdfDeğişen Dünya ve Türkiye // Milliyet, 12/12/1991, s. 12, 19. Mode of Access: http://gazetearsivi.milliyet.com.tr/ GununYayinlari/tm2BCwIolnBK62fQPT2F8w_x3D__x3D_Değişen Dünya ve Türkiye // Milliyet, 12/12/1991, s. 12, 19. Mode of Access: http://gazetearsivi.milliyet.com.tr/ GununYayinlari/tm2BCwIolnBK62fQPT2F8w_x3D__x3D_Demirel, Süleyman. The Compatibility of Islam, Democracy and Secularism // Perceptions, 1997, Vol. 2, Iss. 2. Mode of Access: http://sam.gov.tr/wp-content/ uploads/2012/02/SuleymanDemirel1.pdfDemirel, Süleyman. The Compatibility of Islam, Democracy and Secularism // Perceptions, 1997, Vol. 2, Iss. 2. Mode of Access: http://sam.gov.tr/wp-content/ uploads/2012/02/SuleymanDemirel1.pdfDugin, Aleksandr. Rus Jeopolitiği: Avrasyacı Yaklaşım / Aleksandr Dugin. İstanbul: Küre, 2003. 391 s.Dugin, Aleksandr. Rus Jeopolitiği: Avrasyacı Yaklaşım / Aleksandr Dugin. İstanbul: Küre, 2003. 391 s. Dugin: Turkiye ve Avrasya // Zaman, 18/07/2004.Dugin: Turkiye ve Avrasya // Zaman, 18/07/2004. Ersanlı, Büşra. Can Eurasia Be an Identity Issue for Turkish Foreign Policy? // Turkish Views on Eurasia / editor İsmail Soysal, assistant editor Sevsen Aslantepe. Istanbul: Foundation for Middle East and Balkan Studies, 2001.Ersanlı, Büşra. Can Eurasia Be an Identity Issue for Turkish Foreign Policy? // Turkish Views on Eurasia / editor İsmail Soysal, assistant editor Sevsen Aslantepe. Istanbul: Foundation for Middle East and Balkan Studies, 2001.Ersanlı, Büşra. Türkiye’nin Dış İlişkilerinde Türkçülük ve Avrasya // Bağımsızlıklarının 10. Yılında Türk Cumhuriyetleri: Azerbaycan, Kazakistan, Kırgızistan, Özbekistan, Türkmenistan / Ed. Emine Gürsoy-Naskali, Erdal Şahin. Haarlem: SOTA 2002, s. 149-154.Ersanlı, Büşra. Türkiye’nin Dış İlişkilerinde Türkçülük ve Avrasya // Bağımsızlıklarının 10. Yılında Türk Cumhuriyetleri: Azerbaycan, Kazakistan, Kırgızistan, Özbekistan, Türkmenistan / Ed. Emine Gürsoy-Naskali, Erdal Şahin. Haarlem: SOTA 2002, s. 149-154.İlhan, Attilâ. Sultan Galiyef: Avrasya’da Dolaşan Hayalet / Attilâ İlhan. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2000. 320 s.İlhan, Attilâ. Sultan Galiyef: Avrasya’da Dolaşan Hayalet / Attilâ İlhan. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2000. 320 s.İlhan, Suat. Türklerin Jeopolitiği ve Avrasyacılık / Suat İlhan. Ankara: Bilgi, 2005. 220 s. Imanov, Vügar. Avrasyacılık: Rusya’nın Kimlik Arayışı. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2008. S. 328-334.İlhan, Suat. Türklerin Jeopolitiği ve Avrasyacılık / Suat İlhan. Ankara: Bilgi, 2005. 220 s.Kalın, İbrahim. Turkey and the Middle East: Ideology or Geo-Politics? // Private View, 2008, Vol. 13, p. 26.Imanov, Vügar. Avrasyacılık: Rusya’nın Kimlik Arayışı. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2008. S. 328-334.Kılınç: AB’den destek yok, Doğu’ya bak // Hürriyet, 07/03/2002. Mode of Access: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ kilinc-abden-destek-yok-doguya-bak-58353Kalın, İbrahim. Turkey and the Middle East: Ideology or Geo-Politics? // Private View, 2008, Vol. 13, p. 26. Kılınç: AB’den destek yok, Doğu’ya bak // Hürriyet, 07/03/2002. Mode of Access: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ kilinc-abden-destek-yok-doguya-bak-58353Kınıklıoğlu, Suat. The Return of Ottomanism // Today’s Zaman, 20/03/2007.Kınıklıoğlu, Suat. The Return of Ottomanism // Today’s Zaman, 20/03/2007. Külebi, Ali. The Forgotten Option: Turkish Eurasianism // Hürriyet Daily News, 23/08/2006. Mode of Access: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/the-forgotten-option-turkish-eurasianism.aspx?pageID=438&n=the￾forgotten-option-turkish-eurasianism-2006-08-23Kireev, N.G. Rossiisko-turetskie otnosheniia v kontekste evraziiskikh kontseptsii (Russian-Turkish Relations in the Context of Eurasian Concepts) / Rossiisko-turetskie otnosheniia: istoriia, sovremennoe sostoianie i perspektivy (Russian-Turkish Relations: History, Current Situation, and Prospects). Moscow: Institut vostokovedeniia RAN, 2003, pp. 247-248.Kut, Gün. Elçibey’in Sonu, Türkiye Modelinin Sonudur // Cumhuriyet, 24/06/1993. Kut, Şule. The Contours of Turkish Foreign Policy in the 1990s // Turkey in World Politics: An Emerging Multiregional Power / Edited by Barry Rubin & Kemal Kirişçi. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press, 2002. Pp. 8-10.Külebi, Ali. The Forgotten Option: Turkish Eurasianism // Hürriyet Daily News, 23/08/2006. Mode of Access: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/the-forgotten-option-turkish-eurasianism.aspx?pageID=438&n=the-forgotten-option-turkish-eurasianism-2006-08-23Landau, Jacob M. Pan-Turkism: From Irredentism to Cooperation. London: Hurst & Company, 1995. P. 194.Kut, Gün. Elçibey’in Sonu, Türkiye Modelinin Sonudur // Cumhuriyet, 24/06/1993. Kut, Şule. The Contours of Turkish Foreign Policy in the 1990s // Turkey in World Politics: An Emerging Multiregional Power / Edited by Barry Rubin & Kemal Kirişçi. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press, 2002. Pp. 8-10.Laruelle, Marlène. Russo-Turkish Rapprochement through the Idea of Eurasia: Alexander Dugin’s Networks in Turkey // The Jamestown Foundation Occasional Paper (April 2008). Mode of access: http://www.jamestown.org/ uploads/media/Jamestown-LaruelleRussoTurkish.pdfLandau, Jacob M. Pan-Turkism: From Irredentism to Cooperation. London: Hurst & Company, 1995. P. 194.Mackinder, Halford John. Democratic Ideals and Reality: A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction. Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1944. Mango, Andrew. Turkish Model // Middle Eastern Studies, 1993, Vol. 29, Iss. 4, pp. 726-757.Laruelle, Marlène. Russo-Turkish Rapprochement through the Idea of Eurasia: Alexander Dugin’s Networks in Turkey // The Jamestown Foundation Occasional Paper (April 2008). Mode of access: http://www.jamestown.org/ uploads/media/Jamestown-LaruelleRussoTurkish.pdfMoskova’ya Alti Cevap // Miliyet, 20/10/1994.Mackinder, Halford John. Democratic Ideals and Reality: A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction. Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1944.Özdağ, Ümit. Türkiye’nin Türk Dünyası Politikasının Teorik Çerçevesi // Asya-Avrupa, 1/12/2004.Mackinder, Halford John. Geografi cheskaia os’ istorii (Geographical Axis of History) // Polis, 1994, No. 4, pp. 162-170.Özdoğan, Günay Göksu. Turan’dan ‘Bozkurt’a: Tek Parti Döneminde Türkçülük (1931-1946). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2002.Mango, Andrew. Turkish Model // Middle Eastern Studies, 1993, Vol. 29, Iss. 4, pp. 726-757. Moskova’ya Alti Cevap // Miliyet, 20/10/1994.Perinçek, Doğu. Avrasya Seçeneği: Türkiye İçin Bağımsız Dış Politika / Doğu Perinçek. Istanbul: Kaynak, 1996. 136 s.Özdağ, Ümit. Türkiye’nin Türk Dünyası Politikasının Teorik Çerçevesi // Asya-Avrupa, 1/12/2004.Perinçek, Mehmet. Avrasyacılık: Türkiye’deki Teori ve Pratiği / Mehmet Perinçek. Ankara: Bilgi, 2006. S. 139-141.Özdoğan, Günay Göksu. Turan’dan ‘Bozkurt’a: Tek Parti Döneminde Türkçülük (1931-1946). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2002.Robins, Philip. Between Sentiment and Self-Interest: Turkey’s Policy Toward Azerbaijan and the Central Asian States // The Middle East Journal, 1993, Vol. 47, Iss. 4, pp. 593-610.Perinçek, Doğu. Avrasya Seçeneği: Türkiye İçin Bağımsız Dış Politika / Doğu Perinçek. Istanbul: Kaynak, 1996. 136 s.Rusya Federasyonu ile Türkiye Cumhuriyeti arasında Avrasya’da İşbirliği Eylem Planı (İkili İşbirliğinden Çok Boyutlu Ortaklığa) / Rusya Federasyonu’nun Türkiye Büyükelçiliği. Mode of Access: http://www.turkey.mid.ru/ relat_2_t.html Rusya’ya karşı ortak tavır // Miliyet, 20/10/1994.Perinçek, Mehmet. Avrasyacılık: Türkiye’deki Teori ve Pratiği / Mehmet Perinçek. Ankara: Bilgi, 2006. S. 139-141.Rusya’dan Çin’e bir örgüt // Radikal, 12/08/2007. Mode of Access: http://www.radikal.com.tr/ek_haber. php?ek=r2&haberno=7341Robins, Philip. Between Sentiment and Self-Interest: Turkey’s Policy Toward Azerbaijan and the Central Asian States // The Middle East Journal, 1993, Vol. 47, Iss. 4, pp. 593-610.Sözen, Ahmet. A Paradigm Shift in Turkish Foreign Policy: Transition and Challenges // Turkish Studies, 2010, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 107-108.Rusya Federasyonu ile Türkiye Cumhuriyeti arasında Avrasya’da İşbirliği Eylem Planı (İkili İşbirliğinden Çok Boyutlu Ortaklığa) / Rusya Federasyonu’nun Türkiye Büyükelçiliği. Mode of Access: http://www.turkey.mid.ru/ relat_2_t.htmlSpeech Delivered by the Minister of Foreign Affairs H.E. Ahmet Davutoğlu at the 28th Annual Conference on US-Turkish Relations Organized by ATC-DEIK (Washington DC, 2 June 2009) / Republic of Turkey. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Mode of access: http:// www.mfa.gov.tr/minster_s-speechat-the-28th-annual-conference-on-us-turkish-relations.en.mfa]Rusya’ya karşı ortak tavır // Miliyet, 20/10/1994.T.B.M.M. Tutanak Dergisi. Cilt: 65, 1-inci Birleşim, 1.9.1994 Perşembe, s. 16-32 / Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi Resmi İnternet Sitesi. Mode of Access: https:// www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/TUTANAK/TBMM/d19/ c065/tbmm19065001.pdfRusya’dan Çin’e bir örgüt // Radikal, 12/08/2007. Mode of Access: http://www.radikal.com.tr/ek_haber. php?ek=r2&haberno=7341Taşpınar, Ömer. Batı’ya Kızgınlık Büyüyor // Radikal, 27/07/2005. Mode of Access: http://www.radikal.com.tr/ yorum/batiya-kizginlik-buyuyor-753072/ TBMM’yi yoğun gündem bekliyor // Milliyet, 31/08/1994, s. 17.Shlykov, P.V. Kuda Idet Turciya: Metamorfozy Prozapadnogo Kursa Razvitiya (Where is Turkey Heading for? Metamorphoses of pro-Western Course of Development) // Contemporary Europe, 2013, No. 1 (53), pp. 58-75.Tellal, Erel. Türk Dış Politikasında Avrasya Seçeneği // Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2005, Vol. 2, Iss. 5, p. 50.Shlykov, P.V. Voennaya Ehlita v Politicheskoj Sisteme Tureckoj Respubliki (Military Elite in the Political System of Turkey) // Elity stran Vostoka (Elites of the East Countries). Moscow: Kluch-S, 2011. Pp. 31-60.Türk Kurultayı İzmir’de başladı // Milliyet, 21/10/1994.Sözen, Ahmet. A Paradigm Shift in Turkish Foreign Policy: Transition and Challenges // Turkish Studies, 2010, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 107-108.Türkiye’nin Türk dünyasında ‘’ağabey’ değil ‘ekonomik partner’ olduğu vurgulandı // Milliyet, 6/10/1999.Speech Delivered by the Minister of Foreign Affairs H.E. Ahmet Davutoğlu at the 28th Annual Conference on US-Turkish Relations Organized by ATC-DEIK (Washington DC, 2 June 2009) / Republic of Turkey. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Mode of access: http:// www.mfa.gov.tr/minster_s-speechat-the-28th-annual-conference-on-us-turkish-relations.en.mfa] T.B.M.M. Tutanak Dergisi. Cilt: 65, 1-inci Birleşim, 1.9.1994 Perşembe, s. 16-32 / Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi Resmi İnternet Sitesi. Mode of Access: https:// www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/TUTANAK/TBMM/d19/ c065/tbmm19065001.pdfUslu, Emrullah. Ulusalcılık: The Neo-nationalist Resurgence in Turkey // Turkish Studies, 2008, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 73-97.Taşpınar, Ömer. Batı’ya Kızgınlık Büyüyor // Radikal, 27/07/2005. Mode of Access: http://www.radikal.com.tr/ yorum/batiya-kizginlik-buyuyor-753072/ TBMM’yi yoğun gündem bekliyor // Milliyet, 31/08/1994, s. 17.Winrow, Gareth M. Turkey in Post-Soviet Central Asia. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, Russia and CIS Programme, 1995. 53 p.Tellal, Erel. Türk Dış Politikasında Avrasya Seçeneği // Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2005, Vol. 2, Iss. 5, p. 50.Yanık, Lerna K. The Politics of Educational Exchange: Turkish Education in Eurasia // Europe-Asia Studies, 2004, Vol. 56, Iss. 2, pp. 300-301.Türk Kurultayı İzmir’de başladı // Milliyet, 21/10/1994. Türkiye’nin Türk dünyasında ‘’ağabey’ değil ‘ekonomik partner’ olduğu vurgulandı // Milliyet, 6/10/1999.Yavuz, Hakan. Turkish Identity and Foreign Policy in Flux: The Rise of Neo-Ottomanism // Middle East Critique, 1998, Vol. 7, Iss. 12, pp. 19-41.Urazova, E.I. Turtsiia segodnia: ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo so stranami Iuzhnogo Kavkaza i Tsentral’noi Azii (Turkey Today: Economic Cooperation with the States of South Caucasus and Central Asia). Moscow: Institut vostokovedeniia RAN, 2012. 278 p.Zirvede sıkıntı // Milliyet, 31/10/1992.Uslu, Emrullah. Ulusalcılık: The Neo-nationalist Resurgence in Turkey // Turkish Studies, 2008, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 73-97.Winrow, Gareth M. Turkey in Post-Soviet Central Asia. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, Russia and CIS Programme, 1995. 53 p.Winrow, Gareth M. Turkey in Post-Soviet Central Asia. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, Russia and CIS Programme, 1995. 53 p.Yanık, Lerna K. The Politics of Educational Exchange: Turkish Education in Eurasia // Europe-Asia Studies, 2004, Vol. 56, Iss. 2, pp. 300-301.Yanık, Lerna K. The Politics of Educational Exchange: Turkish Education in Eurasia // Europe-Asia Studies, 2004, Vol. 56, Iss. 2, pp. 300-301.Yavuz, Hakan. Turkish Identity and Foreign Policy in Flux: The Rise of Neo-Ottomanism // Middle East Critique, 1998, Vol. 7, Iss. 12, pp. 19-41.Yavuz, Hakan. Turkish Identity and Foreign Policy in Flux: The Rise of Neo-Ottomanism // Middle East Critique, 1998, Vol. 7, Iss. 12, pp. 19-41.Zirvede sıkıntı // Milliyet, 31/10/1992.Zirvede sıkıntı // Milliyet, 31/10/1992.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.