<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">comparativepolitics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сравнительная политика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comparative Politics Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2221-3279</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-4990</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Издательская группа «Юрист»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-4(25)-95-107</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">comparativepolitics-547</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ЛОКАЛЬНОГО ОПЫТА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LOCAL CASES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫЙ ГЕОПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЙ ПРОЕКТ «МЕЖДУМОРЬЕ»: ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>REGIONAL GEOPOLITICAL PROJECT “INTERMARIUM”: PERSPECTIVES OF REALIZATION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гольцов</surname><given-names>А. Г.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Goltsov</surname><given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.геогр.н., докторант, Институт международных отношений, Киевский национальный университет имени Тараса Шевченко</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Candidate of Geography, Institute of International Relations, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">Andrgengolts1@ukr.net</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Киевский национальный университет имени Тараса Шевченко, г. Киев, Украина<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>4(25)</issue><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>107</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Гольцов А.Г., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Гольцов А.Г.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Goltsov A.G.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/547">https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/547</self-uri><abstract><p>Появление геополитических проектов объединения стран «Междуморья» («Интермариума») относится еще к периоду после первой мировой войны. В эпоху холодной войны одни страны Балто-Черноморского региона входили в состав СССР, а другие были советскими сателлитами. В постбиполярный период расширение НАТО и ЕС на Восток привело к усилению позиций Запада в Центральной и Восточной Европе. Литва, Латвия и Эстония превратились в форпост Запада на границе с Россией. Реализация проекта «Восточное партнерство» приводит к усилению влияния ЕС в Украине и Молдове. Возможная геоэкономическая интеграция в рамках «Междуморья» будет иметь невысокую эффективность. Белоруссия занимает ключевое стратегическое положение в регионе и остается союзником России. Потенциальные угрозы, связанные с геополитикой России в Восточной Европе, стимулируют страны Балто-Черноморского региона разрабатывать новые геополитические проекты создания оборонительного военно-политического объединения. Современная неоимперская геополитика США в Европе имеет целью усиление своего  влияния и направлена, в частности, на поддержку проектов региональных межгосударственных объединений, предназначенных для «сдерживания» России. Для стран Западной Европы геополитические проекты интеграционных объединений в Балто-Черноморском регионе могут иметь целью формирование «санитарного кордона» для изоляции от России. Украина наиболее заинтересована в реализации регионального геополитического проекта «Междуморье». Потенциальное военно-политическое объединение «Междуморье» будет полноценно функционировать лишь при условии сохранения конфронтации между Западом и Россией.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The emergence of geopolitical projects of association of the countries in the “Intermarium” dates back to the period after the First World War. In the era of the Cold War, some countries of the Baltic-Black Sea region were part of the Soviet Union, while others were Soviet satellites. Expansion of NATO and EU toward the East in post-bipolar period has resulted in strengthening of the position of the West in Central and Eastern Europe. Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia have turned into an outpost of the West on the border with Russia. Implementation of the “Eastern Partnership” project leads to increased infl uence of the EU in Ukraine and Moldova. Possible geoeconomic integration within the “Intermarium” is to be of low effi ciency. Belarus has a key strategic position in the region and is an ally of Russia. Potential threats that are emanate from the geopolitics of Russia in Eastern Europe, encourages countries of the Baltic-Black Sea region to develop new geopolitical projects in creating of defensive militarypolitical association. Contemporary neo-imperial geopolitics of the US in Europe is aimed at strengthening of its infl uence and provides, in particular, the support to projects of regional interstate associations, designed to “containment” of Russia. For the countries of the Western Europe geopolitical projects of integration associations in the Baltic-Black Sea region can be designed to form a “cordon sanitaire” for the isolation of Russia Ukraine is a most interested country in the implementation of the military-political project “Intermarium”. The potential militarypolitical association «Intermarium» will be fully functioned only under condition of preservation of the confrontation between the West and Russia.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>«Междуморье»</kwd><kwd>геополитический проект</kwd><kwd>многосторонность</kwd><kwd>союзник</kwd><kwd>неоимперская геополитика</kwd><kwd>«санитарный кордон»</kwd><kwd>военно-политическое объединение</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>“Intermarium”</kwd><kwd>geopolitical project</kwd><kwd>multilateralism</kwd><kwd>ally</kwd><kwd>neo-imperial geopolitics</kwd><kwd>“cordon sanitaire”</kwd><kwd>military-political association.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Воскресенский А.Д. Концепции регионализации, региональных подсистем, региональных комплексов и региональных трансформаций в современных международных отношениях // Сравнительная политика. – 2012. – Т. 3, №2(8) – С. 30- 58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foreign Minister Rinkēvičs urges to transform Eastern Partnership into Euro-Atlantic  Eastern Partnership. Mode of access: http://www.mfa.gov.lv/en/news/latestnews/13631</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гаман-Голутвина О.В., Пономарева Е.Г., Шишелина Л.Н. «Восточное партнерство: борьба сценариев развития // Полис. – 2014. – № 5. – C. 20-40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Friedman, George. Borderlands: A Geopolitical Journey in Eurasia. Austin, TX: Stratfor, 2011. 112 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Горелова Г.В., Рябцев В.Н. Разработка когнитивных моделей геополитических систем (Черноморско-Каспийский регион) // Известия ЮФУ. Технические науки. – 2014. – № 6. – С. 22-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Friedman, George. Borderlands: The New Strategic Landscape // Stratfor, 2014. May 6.  Mode of access: https://www.stratfor.com/weekly/borderlands-new-strategiclandscape</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Грачев М.Н. Геополитическое моделирование как разновидность структурно- функционального анализа мировой политики // Современные геополитические процессы: новые вызовы и поиски решений: в 2 т. Т.1. – СПб.: БГТУ, 2011. – C. 11-16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gaman-Golutvina, O.V.; Ponomaryova, E.G.; Shishelina, L.N. “Vostochnoye  partnerstvo”: bor’ba stsenariyev razvitiya (EU’s “Eastern Partnership”: Rival  Development Scenarios) // Polis, 2014, No. 5, pp. 20-40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ильин М.В. Геохронополитика Балто-Черноморья // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. Сер. Политология. – 2009. – №1. – C. 49-58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gorelova, G.V.; Ryabtsev, V.N. Razrabotka kognitivnykh modeley geopoliticheskikh  sistem (Chernomorsko-Kaspiyskiy region) (Development of Cognitive Models  Geopolitical Systems (Black Sea– Caspian Region)) // Izvestiya YUFU. Tekhnicheskiye nauki, 2014, No. 6, pp. 22-32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Исаев Б.А. Геополитика классическая и геополитика современная // Полис. – 2011. – №2. – С. 69-85.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grachev, M.N. Geopoliticheskoye modelirovaniye kak raznovidnost’ strukturno- funktsional’nogo analiza mirovoy politiki (Geopolitical Simulation as a Variety of Structural and Functional Analysis of World Politics) // Sovremennyye  geopoliticheskiye protsessy: novyye vyzovy i poiski resheniy: 2 Vol. Vol.1. Saint  Petersburg: BGTU, 2011. Pp. 11-16.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Липа Ю. Всеукраїнська трилогія: у 2 т. Т. 2 Чорноморська доктрина. Чорноморський простір (Атлас). Розподіл Росії. – Киев: МАУП, 2007. 392 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ilyin, M.V. Geokhronopolitika Balto-Chernomor’ya (Geochronopolitics of the Baltic- Black Sea Region) // Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. Seriya. Politologiya, 2009, No. 1, pp. 49-58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лурье С.В., Казарян Л.Г. Принципы организации геополитического пространства (введение в проблему на примере Восточного вопроса) // Общественные науки и современность. – 1994. – №4. – C. 85-96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Isaev, B.A. Geopolitika klassicheskaya i geopolitika sovremennaya (The Geopolitics  Classical and the Geopolitics Modern) // Polis, 2011, No. 2, pp. 69-85.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рудницький С.Л. Чому ми хочемо самостійної України? – Львів: Світ, 1994. 416 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jorgensen, Knud E. The European Union in Multilateral Diplomacy // The Hague Journal  of Diplomacy, 2009, Vol. 4, pp. 189-209.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Указ Президента України «Про рішення Ради національної безпеки і оборони України від 6 травня 2015 року №287/2015 «Про Стратегію національної безпеки України». Режим доступа: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/287/2015</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lurie, S.V.; Kazaryan, L.G. Printsipy organizatsii geopoliticheskogo prostranstva  (vvedeniye v problemu na primere Vostochnogo voprosa) (Principles of Organization of  the Geopolitical Space (Introduction to the Problem on the Example of the Eastern  Problem)) // Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’, 1994, No. 4, pp. 85-96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Цымбурский В.Л. Борьба за евразийскую «Атлантиду»: геоэкономика и геостратегия // Остров Россия. Геополитические и геохронологические работы. 1993- 2006. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2007. – C. 301-339.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lypa, Yu. Vseukrayins’ka trylohiya: u 2 t. Vol. 2 Chornomors’ka doktryna.  Chornomors’kyy prostir (Atlas). Rozpodil Rosiyi. (All-Ukrainian Trilogy: in 2 vol.  Vol. 2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Foreign Minister Rinkēvičs urges to transform Eastern Partnership into Euro-Atlantic Eastern Partnership. Mode of access: http://www.mfa.gov.lv/en/news/latestnews/13631</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Black Sea Doctrine. Black Sea Area (Atlas). Division of Russia) Kiev: MAUP, 2007. 392 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Friedman, George. Borderlands: A Geopolitical Journey in Eurasia. Austin, TX: Stratfor, 2011. 112 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manners, Ian. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? // Journal of Common  Market Studies, 2002, Vol. 40, No.2, pp. 235-238.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Friedman, George. Borderlands: The New Strategic Landscape // Stratfor, 2014. May 6. Mode of access: https://www.stratfor.com/weekly/borderlands-new-strategiclandscape Jorgensen, Knud E. The European Union in Multilateral Diplomacy // The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2009, Vol. 4, pp. 189-209.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rudnytsky S.L. Chomu my khochemo samostiynoyi Ukrayiny? (Why Do We Want an  Independent Ukraine?) Lviv: Svit, 1994. 416 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Manners, Ian. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? // Journal of Common Market Studies, 2002, Vol. 40, No.2, pp. 235-238.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ruggie, John G. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution // International  Organization, 1992, Vol. 46, pp. 561-598.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ruggie, John G. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution // International Organization, 1992, Vol. 46, pp. 561-598.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Troebst, Stefan. “Intermarium” and “Wedding to the Sea”: Politics of History and  Mental Mapping in East Central Europe // European Review of History, 2003, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 293-321.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Troebst, Stefan. “Intermarium” and “Wedding to the Sea”: Politics of History and Mental Mapping in East Central Europe // European Review of History, 2003, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 293- 321.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsymbursky V.L. Bor’ba za yevraziyskuyu “Atlantidu”: geoekonomika i geostrategiya //  Ostrov Rossiya.Geopoliticheskiye i geokhronologicheskiye raboty. 1993- 2006. (The  Fight for a “Eurasian Atlantis”: Geoeconomics and Geostrategy // Island Russia.  Geopolitical and Chronopolitical Work. 1993-2006). Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2007. pp. 301- 339.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">USEUCOM Theater Strategy, October 2015. Mode of access: http://www.eucom.mil/media- library/documents/2016</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrayiny “Pro rishennya Rady natsional’noyi bezpeky i oborony  Ukrayiny vid 6 travnya 2015 roku № 287/2015 “Pro Stratehiyu natsional’noyi bezpeky  Ukrayiny” (Decree of the President of Ukraine “On the decision of the National  Security and Defense Council of Ukraine on May 6, 2015 No 287/2015 “On National  Security Strategy of Ukraine”). Mode of access: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/287/2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zielonka, Jan. Europe as a global actor: empire by example? // International Affairs, 2008, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 471-484.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">USEUCOM Theater Strategy, October 2015. Mode of access: http://www.eucom.mil/media- library/documents/2016 Voskressenski, A.D. Kontseptsii regionalizatsii, regional’nykh podsistem, regional’nykh kompleksov i regional’nykh trans-formatsiy v  sovremennykh mezh du narodnykh otnosheniyakh (Concepts of Regionalization, Regio nal  Subsystems, Regional Complexes and Regional Transformation in Contemporary International Relations) // Comparative Politics Russia, 2012, Vol. 3, No.2(8),  pp.30-58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zielonka, Jan. Europe as a global actor: empire by example? // International  Affairs, 2008, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 471-484.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zielonka, Jan. Europe as a global actor: empire by example? // International  Affairs, 2008, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 471-484.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
