<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">comparativepolitics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сравнительная политика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comparative Politics Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2221-3279</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-4990</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Издательская группа «Юрист»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46272/2221-3279-2024-4-15-7</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">comparativepolitics-1723</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>«МИРОВОЕ БОЛЬШИНСТВО» В СВОЕМ МНОГООБРАЗИИ: РЕГИОНАЛЬНОЕ ИЗМЕРЕНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THE “GLOBAL MAJORITY“ IN ITS DIVERSITY: THE REGIONAL DIMENSION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Треугольник Индия – Китай – США в Южной Азии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The India-China-USA Triangle in South Asia and Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5850-1188</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лунев</surname><given-names>С. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Lunev</surname><given-names>S. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Лунев Сергей Иванович – доктор исторических наук, профессор МГИМО МИД России, главный научный сотрудник Института востоковедения РАН.</p><p>119454, Москва, Проспект Вернадского, д. 76</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. Sergey I. Lunev – Dr. of Science (History), Professor, MGIMO University; Principal Chief Research Fellow, Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.</p><p>76 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">silounev@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Давыденко</surname><given-names>А. Ю.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Davydenko</surname><given-names>A. Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Давыденко Анатолий Юрьевич – кандидат исторических наук, доцент МГИМО МИД России.</p><p>119454, Москва, Проспект Вернадского, д. 76</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. Anatoly Yu. Davydenko – Assistant Professor, MGIMO University.</p><p>76 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">andavy10@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГИМО МИД России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>MGIMO University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>01</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title>Мировое большинство в чаянии пассионарности</issue-title><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>131</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Лунев С.И., Давыденко А.Ю., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Лунев С.И., Давыденко А.Ю.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Lunev S.I., Davydenko A.Y.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1723">https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1723</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье анализируются пути трансформации Южной Азии, специфика внешнеполитических стратегий великих держав, сопряженность регионализации и глобализации (их сочетание или противостояние), а также перспективы противостояния / взаимозависимости сверхкрупных стран в регионе. В настоящее время Южная Азия неизбежно испытывает на себе многосторонние и неоднозначные последствия крупнейших геополитических сдвигов. Анализ текущей ситуации приобретает особое значение, поскольку данный регион в определенной мере отражает изменившуюся глобальную обстановку. В Южной Азии расположены государства, которые существенно отличаются друг от друга по численности населения, географическим масштабам, военной и экономической мощи, научно-техническому потенциалу, цивилизационным особенностям и другим параметрам, которые определяют все аспекты межгосударственных отношений. Индия по всем базовым параметрам намного превосходит всех соседей по региону вместе взятых, что порождает у них особые опасения и вызывает чувство собственной беспомощности. При такой ситуации соседи азиатского гиганта стремятся укрепить свои позиции, делая ставку на внерегиональные державы (в настоящий момент это, прежде всего, Китай) и вынося спорные вопросы во взаимоотношениях с Индией на международное обсуждение. В статье разбираются такие вопросы, как воздействие внешнего фактора на международную обстановку в Южной Азии, существенные перемены в положении великих держав после начала постбиполярного периода, индийско-китайское противостояние и негативная для России и Китая роль США в регионе.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article examines the transformation of South Asia, highlighting the distinctive characteristics of the foreign policy strategies of major powers, the interplay between regionalization and globalization, and the prospects for either confrontation or interdependence among the region’s dominant states. South Asia is currently undergoing multifaceted and ambiguous repercussions of significant geopolitical shifts, underscoring the growing importance of analyzing the contemporary phase of interstate relations in this region. South Asia, in many ways, mirrors the broader global changes but on a smaller scale. The region comprises countries with stark disparities in territory, population, economic capacity, scientific and technological advancement, military power, as well as cultural and civilizational traits – all of which significantly shape interstate relations. India’s dominance within the region fosters distrust among its neighbors and exacerbates their perception of vulnerability. Consequently, these states increasingly seek to strengthen their positions in both regional and international arenas by leveraging relationships with extra-regional powers, most notably China. Moreover, unresolved disputes with India are frequently brought to the attention of the international community. The article also addresses the impact of external factors on South Asia’s international relations system, focusing on the substantial shifts in the strategies of major powers following the Cold War. It explores key issues such as the Indian-Chinese rivalry in the region, the United States’ adverse influence, and Russia’s policy toward South Asia.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Южная Азия</kwd><kwd>Индия</kwd><kwd>Китай</kwd><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>Россия</kwd><kwd>противостояние</kwd><kwd>«новая холодная война»</kwd><kwd>внешнеполитическая стратегия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>South Asia</kwd><kwd>India</kwd><kwd>China</kwd><kwd>USA</kwd><kwd>Russia</kwd><kwd>confrontation</kwd><kwd>“new cold war”</kwd><kwd>foreign policy strategy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Володин А.Г. (2016) Индия и «страны Южных морей»: геоэкономические интересы и геополитические императивы. Геополитический журнал 4(16): 7–14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bajpai K., Huang J., Mahbubani K. (2016) China-India Relations. Routledge. 242 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Галищева Н.В., Рещикова М.С. (2021) Индийско-китайские отношения: борьба «Тигра» и «Дракона» за место под солнцем. Международные процессы 19(4): 104-122. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.4.67.5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clary C., Lalwani S., Siddiqui N. (2021) Public Opinion and Crisis Behavior in a Nuclearized South Asia. International Studies Quarterly 65(4): 1064-1076. DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqab042.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Галищева Н.В., Рещикова М.С. (2023) Индия и Китай в Южной Азии: борьба за политическое и экономическое влияние в регионе. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Востоковедение и африканистика 15(1): 133-154. DOI: 10.21638/spbu13.2023.109.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ezhegodnik SIPRI, 2014. (2015) Vooruzheniya, razoruzhenie i mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost’. Moscow: IMEMO RAS. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ежегодник СИПРИ, 2014 (2015) Вооружения, разоружение и международная безопасность. Москва: ИМЭМО РАН.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galishсheva N.V., Reshсhikova M.S. (2021) Indijsko-kitajskie otnosheniya: bor`ba «Tigra» i «Drakona» za mesto pod solncem [Indian-Chinese relations: the struggle of the «Tiger» and the «Dragon» for a place in the sun]. Mezhdunarodnye processy [International Trends] 19(4): 104-122. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.4.67.5. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Замараева Н.А. (2023) Китай во внутренней и внешней политике Пакистана (2021-2022 гг.). В: Сафронова Е.И. (сост., отв. ред.) Китай в мировой и региональной политике. История и современность. Выпуск XXVIII. Москва: ИКСА РАН. С. 130-147.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galishсheva N.V., Reshсhikova M.S. (2023) Indiya i Kitaj v Yuzhnoj Azii: bor’ba za politicheskoe i ekonomicheskoe vliyanie v regione [India and China in South Asia: the struggle for political and economic influence in the region]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Oriental and African Studies] 15 (1): 133-154. DOI: 10.21638/spbu13.2023.109. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Куприянов А.В. (2020) Китайский фактор в формировании индийского подхода к концепции индо-тихоокеанского региона. Сравнительная политика 11(2): 68-75. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gupta V. (1972) Anderson Papers. A Study of Nixon’s Blackmail of India. Delhi: Indian School Supply Depot, Publication Division. 236 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Куприянов А.В. (2023) Присутствие США и КНР в регионе Индийского океана: взгляд из Нью-Дели. США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура 53(9): 32-45. DOI: 10.31857/S2686673023090031.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khalilzad Z. (1989) The United States in South Asia. Current History 88(542): 417-420. DOI: 10.1525/curh.1989.88.542.417.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лунев С.И. (2019a) Политика Китая в отношении Южной Азии и реакция Индии. В: Воскресенский А.Д. (ред.) Модель развития современного Китая: оценки, дискуссии, прогнозы. Москва: Стратегические изыскания. С. 463-486.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kupriyanov A.V. (2023) Prisutstvie SShA i KNR v regione Indiiskogo okeana: vzgliad iz N’iu-Deli [The presence of the United States and China in the Indian Ocean region: a view from New Delhi]. SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul’tura [USA and Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture] 53(9): 32-45. DOI: 10.31857/S2686673023090031. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лунев С.И. (2019b) Регионализация и интеграция: Индия и Южная Азия. Москва: Юрайт. 304 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kupriyanov A.V. (2020) Kitajskij faktor v formirovanii indijskogo podxoda k koncepcii indo-tihookeanskogo regiona [The Chinese factor in the formation of the Indian approach to the concept of the Indo-Pacific region]. Sravnitel’naia politika [Comparative Politics] 11(2): 68-75. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10020. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лунев С.И. (2020a) Проблемы терроризма и подходы к Афганистану в треугольнике Россия-Индия-Китай. Сравнительная политика 11(2): 76-88. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10021.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunev S.I. (2019a) Politika Kitaya v otnoshenii Yuzhnoj Azii i reakciya Indii [China’s policy towards South Asia and India’s reaction]. In: Voskressensky A.D. (ed.) Model’ razvitiya sovremennogo Kitaya: ocenki, diskussii, prognozy [The model of the development of modern China: assessments, discussions, forecasts]. Moscow: Strategicheskie izyskaniya. Pp. 463-486. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лунев С.И. (2020b) Россия и Индия в Индо-Тихоокеанском регионе и фактор США. Актуальные проблемы Европы 1: 182-212. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2020.01.09.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunev S.I. (2019b) Regionalizaciya i integraciya: Indiya i Yuzhnaya Aziya [Regionalization and integration: India and South Asia]. Moscow: Yurajt. 304 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шавлай Э.П. (2020) Китайский фактор в индийско-американских отношениях. Сравнительная политика 11(2): 57-67. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunev S.I. (2020a) Problemy terrorizma i podkhody k Afganistanu v treugol’nike Rossiia-Indiia-Kitai [Problems of Terrorism and Approaches to Afghanistan in the Russia-India-China Triangle]. Sravnitel’naia politika [Comparative Politics] 11(2): 76-88. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10021. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шаумян Т.Л. (2022) Индия на глобальных перекрестках. Свободная мысль 2: 145-155.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunev S.I. (2020b) Rossiia i Indiia v Indo-Tikhookeanskom regione i faktor SShA [Russia and India in the Indo-Pacific region and the US factor]. Aktual’nye problemy Evropy [Current Problems of Europe] 1: 182-212. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2020.01.09. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bajpai K., Huang J., Mahbubani K. (2016) China-India Relations. Routledge. 242 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mazumdar A. (2014) Indian Foreign Policy in Transition: Relations with South Asia. London: Routledge. 244 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clary C., Lalwani S., Siddiqui N. (2021) Public Opinion and Crisis Behavior in a Nuclearized South Asia. International Studies Quarterly 65(4): 1064-1076. DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqab042.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mearsheimer J.J. (2021) The Inevitable Rivalry: America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics. Foreign Affairs 100(6): 48-58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gupta V. (1972) Anderson Papers. A Study of Nixon’s Blackmail of India. Delhi: Indian School Supply Depot, Publication Division. 236 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mohan C. (2012) Samudra Manthan: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. 330 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khalilzad Z. (1989) The United States in South Asia. Current History 88(542): 417-420. DOI: 10.1525/curh.1989.88.542.417.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Musharraf P. (2006) In the Line of Fire: A Memoir. N.Y.: Free Press. 368 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mazumdar A. (2014) Indian Foreign Policy in Transition: Relations with South Asia. London: Routledge. 244 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaumyan T.L. (2022) Indiia na global’nykh perekrestkakh [India at global crossroads]. Svobodnaia mysl’ [Free Thought] 2: 145-155. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mearsheimer J.J. (2021) The Inevitable Rivalry: America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics. Foreign Affairs 100(6): 48-58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shavlaj E.P. (2020) Kitaiskii faktor v indiisko-amerikanskikh otnosheniiakh [The Chinese factor in Indian-American relations]. Sravnitel’naia politika [Comparative Politics] 11(2): 57-67. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10019. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mohan C. (2012) Samudra Manthan: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. 330 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Singh S. (2013) India in South Asia: Domestic identity politics and foreign policy from Nehru to the BJP. London: Routledge. 176 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Musharraf P. (2006) In the Line of Fire: A Memoir. N.Y.: Free Press. 368 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volodin A.G. (2016) Indiya i «strany Yuzhnyh morei»: geoekonomicheskie interesy i geopoliticheskie imperativy. [India and the «South Sea countries»: geo-economic interests and geopolitical imperatives]. Geopoliticheskij Zhurnal [The Geopolitical Journal] 4(16): 7-14. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Singh S. (2013) India in South Asia: Domestic identity politics and foreign policy from Nehru to the BJP. London: Routledge. 176 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zamaraeva N.A. (2023) Kitaj vo vnutrennej i vneshnej politike Pakistana (2021-2022 gg.) [China in the domestic and foreign policy of Pakistan (2021-2022)], Kitaj v mirovoj i regional’noj politike. Istoriya i sovremennost’. Vypusk XXVIII : ezhegodnoe izdanie [China in world and regional politics. History and modernity. Issue XXVIII: Annual edition]. Moscow: IKSA RAS. Pp. 130-147. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
