<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">comparativepolitics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сравнительная политика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comparative Politics Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2221-3279</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-4990</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Издательская группа «Юрист»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10019</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">comparativepolitics-1129</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СРАВНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА И ГЕОПОЛИТИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>COMPARATIVE POLITICS AND GEOPOLITICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>КИТАЙСКИЙ ФАКТОР В ИНДИЙСКО-АМЕРИКАНСКИХ ОТНОШЕНИЯХ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>CHINESE FACTOR IN INDIA-US RELATIONS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шавлай</surname><given-names>Э. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shavlay</surname><given-names>E. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Эллина Петровна Шавлай</p><p>аналитик, лаборатория анализа международных процессов; преподаватель, кафедра английского языка №1; аспирант кафедры востоковедения</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ellina P. Shavlay</p><p>Analyst, Laboratory of International Trends Analysis; English Teacher, English Department № 1; Postgraduate Student in History, Department of Asian and African Studies</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">shavlaj.e.p@my.mgimo.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный институт  международных отношений (Университет) МИД России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>MGIMO University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>КИТАЙ КАК ГЛОБАЛЬНЫЙ ФАКТОР: СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ВАРИАНТОВ ОТВЕТОВ</issue-title><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Шавлай Э.П., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Шавлай Э.П.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shavlay E.P.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1129">https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1129</self-uri><abstract><p>Отношения с КНР как у Индии, так и у Соединенных Штатов Америки довольно непростые. Основой индийско-китайского диалога можно считать исторический фундамент, заложенный войной 1962 года, после которой отношения двух азиатских гигантов стали характеризоваться охлаждением друг к другу и взаимным недоверием. Несмотря на то, что конец XX века ознаменовался началом налаживания двустороннего взаимодействия, сотрудничество между Дели и Пекином всё ещё не соответствует их потенциалу. Что касается отношений США и Китая, то на современном этапе оно всё чаще именуется соперничеством двух сверхдержав – устоявшейся, но теряющей свои позиции, и потенциальной. Разногласия Китая и США находятся в рамках передела сфер влияния и вопросов региональной безопасности, так как КНР расшатывает устоявшийся баланс сил, нарушая статус-кво между сторонами, тем самым создавая угрозу американским интересам как в Азиатско-Тихоокеанском регионе (АТР), так и в глобальном масштабе. Индийско-американские отношения в ретроспективе развивались достаточно неравномерно: США отдавали предпочтение Пакистану, в то время как Индии отводилась второстепенная роль, хотя бывали и периоды активного диалога. Тогда выбор Вашингтона был обусловлен противостоянием с СССР и непосредственным образом сказался на сотрудничестве с Дели. Однако в последние годы американский истеблишмент стал обращать всё больше внимания на Азиатско-Тихоокеанский регион, что связано с подъёмом Китая и его превращением в основного геополитического соперника США в мире. На этом фоне возросла роль Индии как второй ключевой державы в регионе, который в американской внешней политике получил новое звучание, трансформировавшись в Индийско-Тихоокеанский (ИТР). Новые геополитические реалии и предопределяют актуальность данного исследования, направленного на анализ влияния китайского фактора на взаимодействие Индии и США.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Relations within India-US-China triangle are rather complicated. The basis of the Sino-Indian dialogue was laid by the 1962 war, after which mutual distrust became its permanent feature. Despite the fact that the late 20th century was marked by rapprochement of bilateral cooperation, it is still off the mark. As for relations between the United States and China, today it is increasingly referred to as the rivalry of two superpowers – an established, but losing its positions, and a potential one. Historically, Indian-American relations suffered fluctuations: the US gave preference to Pakistan, while India was assigned a secondary role, though in some periods the parties saw active dialogue. Washington’s choice was determined by its confrontation with the USSR, which directly affected cooperation with Delhi. However, in recent years, the American establishment has begun to pay more attention to the Asia-Pacific region due to the rise of China and its transformation into the main US geopolitical rival. Against this background, India started to pave its way as the second key power in the region by promoting its regional initiatives, with the Indo-Pacific being the most prominent. This shift received a new sound in American foreign policy, too. New geopolitical realities predetermine the relevance of this study, aimed at analyzing the influence of the Chinese factor on the interaction between India and the United States.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Индия</kwd><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>китайский фактор</kwd><kwd>геополитика</kwd><kwd>Индо-Тихоокеанский регион</kwd><kwd>региональные державы</kwd><kwd>Азия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>India</kwd><kwd>USA</kwd><kwd>Chinese factor</kwd><kwd>geopolitics</kwd><kwd>Indo-Pacifi c region</kwd><kwd>regional powers</kwd><kwd>Asia</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при поддержке Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации (номер договора о выделении гранта 14.461.31.0002).</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The research is funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant agreement number 14.461.31.0002).</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Воскресенский А.Д. «Большая Восточная Азия»: мировая политика и энергетическая безопасность / А.Д. Воскресенский. М.: Ленанд, 2006. 124 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dutt, V.P. India’s Foreign Policy In A Changing World, 2004 / Vikas Publishing House – Delhi, p. 59-61. Mode of access: https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.131152/2015.131152.India-Foreign-Policy-In-AChanging-World#page/n63/mode/2up</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лунев С.И. Балансирование Индии между США, Китаем и Россией // Запад–Восток–Россия 2017. Ежегодник / Отв. ред.: Д.Б. Малышева, В.Г. Хорос. М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2018. 190 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Feigenbaum, E.A. The New Asian Order – And How the United States Fits In // The Foreign Affairs, February 2, 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лунёв С.И. Значение Большой Восточной Азии для укрепления позиций России / Высшая школа экономики: интернет-сайт. Режим доступа: https://www.hse.ru › data › 2010/03/29 › Lunev</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fravel, M. Taylor. U.S. Policy Towards the Disputes in the South China Sea Since 1995 / Policy Report. S. Rajarathnam School of International Studies. March 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лунев С.И. Южная Азия и Китай // Китай в XXI веке: глобализация интересов безопасности / Отв. ред. – Чуфрин Г.И. М.: Наука, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gilboy, G. Chinese and Indian Strategic Behavior. Cambridge University Press, 2012. 532 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мировое комплексное регионоведение / под ред. проф. А.Д. Воскресенского. М.: Магистр: ИНФРА-М, 2014. 416 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ikenberry, J.G. American Hegemony and East Asian Order // Australian Journal of International Affairs, 2004, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 353-367.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мировое комплексное регионоведение: введение в специальность / под ред. проф. А.Д. Воскресенского. М.: Магистр: ИНФРА-М, 2015. 448 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kanaev, E.A. China’s and the US’ Approaches to the South China Sea Issue: Changing Patterns and Strategic Implications / in: Security and Cooperation in the South China Sea. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Михайленко Е.Б. «Старый» и «новый» регионализм: теоретический дискурс // Курс лекций. Екатеринбург, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khilnani, S.; Kumar, R.; Mehta, P.B. Nonalignment 2.0. A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in the Twenty First Century. Mode of access: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/sga/kii/documents/NonAlignment20.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мосяков Д. На грани фола: политика Китая в ЮжноКитайском море // Индекс безопасности. 2013. №4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunev, S.I. Balansirovaniye Indii mezhdu SSHA, Kitayem i Rossiyey (Balancing India between the USA, China and Russia) // West – East – Russia 2017. Yearbook / Ed.: D.B. Malysheva, V.G. Khoros. Moscow: IMEMO RAS, 2018.190 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dutt, V.P. India’s Foreign Policy In A Changing World, 2004 / Vikas Publishing House – Delhi, p. 59-61. Mode of access: https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.131152/2015.131152.IndiaForeign-Policy-In-A-Changing-World#page/n63/mode/2up</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunev, S.I. Yuzhnaya Aziya i Kitay (South Asia and China) // in Kitay v XXI veke: globalizatsiya interesov bezopasnosti (China in the XXI Century: Globalization of Security Interests) / Ed. by Chufrin G.I. Moscow: Nauka, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feigenbaum, E.A. The New Asian Order – And How the United States Fits In // The Foreign Affairs, February 2, 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunev, S.I. Znacheniye Bol’shoy Vostochnoy Azii dlya ukrepleniya pozitsiy Rossii (The Importance of Greater East Asia for Strengthening Russia’s Positions) / Higher School of Economics: Website. Mode of access: https:// www.hse.ru ›data› 2010/03/29 ›Lunev</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fravel, M. Taylor. U.S. Policy Towards the Disputes in the South China Sea Since 1995 / Policy Report. S. Rajarathnam School of International Studies. March 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunev, S.I.; Shavlay, E.P. Russia and India in the IndoPacific // Asian Politics and Policy, 2018, No. 10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gilboy, G. Chinese and Indian Strategic Behavior. Cambridge University Press, 2012. 532 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Madan, T. The U.S.-India Relations and China // Brookings, 20.01.2015. Mode of access: http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2015/01/20-us-indiarelationship-and-china-madan</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ikenberry, J.G. American Hegemony and East Asian Order // Australian Journal of International Affairs, 2004, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 353-367.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mikhailenko, E.B. Staryy» i «novyy» regionalizm: teoreticheskiy diskurs (“Old” and “New” Regionalism: Theoretical Discourse). Ekaterinburg, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kanaev, E.A. China’s and the US’ Approaches to the South China Sea Issue: Changing Patterns and Strategic Implications / in: Security and Cooperation in the South China Sea. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mirovoye kompleksnoye regionovedeniye (World Comprehensive Regional Studies) / Ed. by Prof. Alexei D. Voskressenski. Moscow: Master: INFRA-M, 2014. 416 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khilnani, S.; Kumar, R.; Mehta, P.B. Nonalignment 2.0. A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in the Twenty First Century. Mode of access: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/sga/kii/documents/NonAlignment20.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mirovoye kompleksnoye regionovedeniyevvedeniye v spetsial’nost’ (World Comprehensive Regional Studies: introduction to the specialty) / Ed. by Prof. Alexei D. Voskressenski. Moscow: Master: INFRA-M, 2015. 448 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lunev, S.I.; Shavlay, E.P. Russia and India in the IndoPacific // Asian Politics and Policy, 2018, No. 10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mosyakov, D. Na grani fola: politika Kitaya v YuzhnoKitayskom more (On the Verge of a Foul: China’s Policy in the South China Sea) // Indeks bezopasnosti, 2013, No. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Madan, T. The U.S.-India Relations and China // Brookings, 20.01.2015. Mode of access: http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2015/01/20-us-india-relationshipand-china-madan</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nonalignment 2.0. A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in 21 Century / Centre for Policy Research, 2012 72</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nonalignment 2.0. A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in 21 Century / Centre for Policy Research, 2012 72 p. Mode of access: http://ris.org.in/images/RIS_images/pdf/NonAlignment.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">p. Mode of access: http://ris.org.in/images/RIS_images/pdf/NonAlignment.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Palit, A. Economics in Modi’s Foreign Policy / IFRI, p. 13. // Mode of access: https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/fi les/asie_visions77_0.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Palit, A. Economics in Modi’s Foreign Policy / IFRI, p. 13. // Mode of access: https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/asie_visions77_0.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tellis, J.A.; Mirski, S. Crux of Asia. China, India and the Emerging World Order / A.J. Tellis, S. Mirski. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2013. 270 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tellis, J.A.; Mirski, S. Crux of Asia. China, India and the Emerging World Order / A.J. Tellis, S. Mirski. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2013. 270 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Voskressenski, Alexei D. “Bol’shaya Vostochnaya Aziaya”: Mirovaya Politika I Energeticheskaya Bezopasnost’ (“The Greater East Asia”: World Politics and Energy Security). Moscow: Lenand, 2006. 124 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voskressenski, Alexei D. “Bol’shaya Vostochnaya Aziaya”: Mirovaya Politika I Energeticheskaya Bezopasnost’ (“The Greater East Asia”: World Politics and Energy Security). Moscow: Lenand, 2006. 124 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
