comparativepoliticsСравнительная политикаComparative Politics Russia2221-32792412-4990Издательская группа «Юрист»10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10001comparativepolitics-1078Research ArticleСРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ КОНЦЕПЦИЙ И ИНСТИТУТОВCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTS AND INSTITUTIONSГЛОБАЛЬНАЯ ГЕГЕМОНИЯ И РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ГЕГЕМОНИЯ: ВЛАСТЬ И СТРАТЕГИЯ СШАGLOBAL HEGEMONY VS. REGIONAL HEGEMONY: HOW THE US STRATEGICALLY INFLUENCES POWERКросстонМ.CrosstonM.

профессор, программный директор по исследованиям разведки

Professor, Program Director of Intelligence Studies; Senior Doctoral Faculty, Global Security and Strategic Intelligence

mcrosston@apus.eduАмериканский военный университетРоссияAmerican Military UniversityRussian Federation202014012020111515Copyright © Кросстон М., 20202020Кросстон М.Crosston M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1078

Автор статьи рассматривает противоречивый тезис о том, что стратегия США направлен на последовательное противодействие появлению региональных держав в разных частях света. Будь то Россия на постсоветском пространстве, Китай в Южно-Китайское море, Соединенные Штаты стремятся ограничить их региональную гегемонию, хотя сами по-прежнему остаются глобальным гегемоном. Автор рассматривает сущность и способы использования власти в XXI веке: является ли появление региональных гегемонов разрушительным явлением для мировой системы или конструктивным? Обусловлена ли озабоченность Соединенных Штатов о национальной безопасности и собственном глобальном влиянии альтруистической или эгоистичной мотивацией? Имеет ли значение, кто именно пытается приобрести региональное влияние? Эти и другие вопросы рассматриваются в статье, а автор предлагает новый подход на понимание того, как международная власть используется сегодня и может быть применена в обозримом будущем.

The article explores the controversial thesis that the United States strategically and consistently maneuvers against the emergence of regional hegemons across the globe. Whether it is Russia in the former Soviet space, China across the South China Sea, the United States works to disallow the expression of regional hegemonic power despite its own continued reliance on its global hegemony being accepted. The author goes to the heart of power positioning and exploitation in the 21st century: is the emergence of regional hegemons disruptive to the global system or benefi cial? Is the United States’ concerns altruistic or selfi shly motivated by its own national security interests and global infl uence? Does it matter who is trying to wield regional infl uence? These and other questions are addressed, providing a new approach to understanding how power is being wielded today and for the foreseeable future.

гегемониярегионализмСоединенные Штатывнешняя политикаРоссияКитайвластьhegemonyregionalismUnited Statesforeign policyRussiaChinapowerReferencesBurman, S. Necklace or Noose? Challenges to American Hegemony // Foresight: The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 2008, No. 10(4), pp. 69-75.Burman, S. Necklace or Noose? Challenges to American Hegemony // Foresight: The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 2008, No. 10(4), pp. 69-75.Diez, T. Normative Power as Hegemony // Cooperation and Confl ict, 2013, No. 48(2), pp. 194-210.Diez, T. Normative Power as Hegemony // Cooperation and Confl ict, 2013, No. 48(2), pp. 194-210.Good, A. American Exception: Hegemony and the Dissimulation of the State // Administration & Society, 2018, No. 50(1), pp. 4-29.Good, A. American Exception: Hegemony and the Dissimulation of the State // Administration & Society, 2018, No. 50(1), pp. 4-29.Hurrell, A. Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-be great Powers? // International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944),2006, No. 82(1), pp. 1-19.Hurrell, A. Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-be great Powers? // International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944),2006, No. 82(1), pp. 1-19.Inkster, N. Coming to Terms with Chinese Power // Survival, 2016, No. 58(1), pp. 209-216.Inkster, N. Coming to Terms with Chinese Power // Survival, 2016, No. 58(1), pp. 209-216.Keaney, M. Globalisation, hegemony and perspective // Political Studies Review, 2015, No. 13(3), pp. 339-350.Keaney, M. Globalisation, hegemony and perspective // Political Studies Review, 2015, No. 13(3), pp. 339-350.Kilic, C. Chinese Hegemony: What Kind of Global Power? // All Azimuth, 2017, No. 6(1). Kirkham, K. The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How Successful Is the Russian Regional Hegemony? // Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2016, No. 7(2), pp. 111-128.Kilic, C. Chinese Hegemony: What Kind of Global Power? // All Azimuth, 2017, No. 6(1). Kirkham, K. The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How Successful Is the Russian Regional Hegemony? // Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2016, No. 7(2), pp. 111-128.Knight, W.A. From Hegemony to Post Hegemony? // Ideaz, 2012, 10-12.Knight, W.A. From Hegemony to Post Hegemony? // Ideaz, 2012, 10-12.Kuchins, A.C. Russia in the CIS in 2013: Russia’s Pivot to Asia // Asian Survey, 2014, No. 54(1).Kuchins, A.C. Russia in the CIS in 2013: Russia’s Pivot to Asia // Asian Survey, 2014, No. 54(1).Layne, C. The Waning of U.S. Hegemony-Myth or Reality? A Review Essay // International Security, 2009, No. 34(1), pp. 147-172.Layne, C. The Waning of U.S. Hegemony-Myth or Reality? A Review Essay // International Security, 2009, No. 34(1), pp. 147-172.Ljungwall, C.; Bohman, V. Mending Vulnerabilities to Isolation: How Chinese Power Grows out of the Development of the Belt and Road Initiative // The RUSI Journal, 2017, No. 162(5).Ljungwall, C.; Bohman, V. Mending Vulnerabilities to Isolation: How Chinese Power Grows out of the Development of the Belt and Road Initiative // The RUSI Journal, 2017, No. 162(5).Monaghan, A. “Calmly Critical”: Evolving Russian Views of US Hegemony // Journal of Strategic Studies, 2006, No. 29(6), pp. 987-1013.Monaghan, A. “Calmly Critical”: Evolving Russian Views of US Hegemony // Journal of Strategic Studies, 2006, No. 29(6), pp. 987-1013.Pan, C. Rethinking Chinese Power: A Conceptual Corrective to the “Power Shift” Narrative // Asian Perspective, 2014, No. 38(3).Pan, C. Rethinking Chinese Power: A Conceptual Corrective to the “Power Shift” Narrative // Asian Perspective, 2014, No. 38(3).Parmar, I. Foundation Networks and American Hegemony // European Journal of American Studies, 2012, Vol. 7, No. 1.Parmar, I. Foundation Networks and American Hegemony // European Journal of American Studies, 2012, Vol. 7, No. 1.Paun, S. Is American Hegemony Stable and Sustainable? // Geopolitics, History and International Relations, 2010, No. 2(1), pp. 134-139.Paun, S. Is American Hegemony Stable and Sustainable? // Geopolitics, History and International Relations, 2010, No. 2(1), pp. 134-139.Pieper, M. Chinese, Russian, and Turkish Policies in the Iranian Nuclear Dossier: Between Resistance to Hegemony and Hegemonic Accommodation // Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 2014, No. 2(1).Pieper, M. Chinese, Russian, and Turkish Policies in the Iranian Nuclear Dossier: Between Resistance to Hegemony and Hegemonic Accommodation // Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 2014, No. 2(1).Selden, Z. Balancing against or Balancing with? The Spectrum of Alignment and the Endurance of American Hegemony // Security Studies, 2013, No. 22(2), pp. 330- 364.Selden, Z. Balancing against or Balancing with? The Spectrum of Alignment and the Endurance of American Hegemony // Security Studies, 2013, No. 22(2), pp. 330- 364.Valladao, A.G.A. Democratic Hegemony and American Hegemony // Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2006, No. 19(2), pp. 243-260.Valladao, A.G.A. Democratic Hegemony and American Hegemony // Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2006, No. 19(2), pp. 243-260.Willerton, J.P.; Goertz, G.; Slobodchikoff, M.O. Mistrust and Hegemony: Regional Institutional Design, the FSU-CIS, and Russia // International Area Studies Review, 2015, No. 18(1), pp. 26-52.Willerton, J.P.; Goertz, G.; Slobodchikoff, M.O. Mistrust and Hegemony: Regional Institutional Design, the FSU-CIS, and Russia // International Area Studies Review, 2015, No. 18(1), pp. 26-52.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.