comparativepoliticsСравнительная политикаComparative Politics Russia2221-32792412-4990Издательская группа «Юрист»10.24411/2221-3279-2019-10045comparativepolitics-1070Research ArticleСРАВНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА И ГЕОПОЛИТИКАCOMPARATIVE POLITICS AND GEOPOLITICS«ЗОМИЯ» КАК МОДЕЛЬ НЕЗАПАДНОГО ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОГО СОПРОТИВЛЕНИЯ“ZOMIA” AS A MODEL OF NON-WESTERN POLITICAL RESISTANCEХаркевичМ. В.KharkevichM. V.

к.полит.н., доцент, доцент кафедры мировых политических процессов

Москва

Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of World Politics

Moscow

m.kharkevich@inno.mgimo.ruМосковский государственный институт международных отношений (Университет) МИД РоссииРоссияMGIMO UniversityRussian Federation201918122019104Специальный номер "Незападные трансформации"108119Copyright © Харкевич М.В., 20192019Харкевич М.В.Kharkevich M.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1070

Различные формы государственной власти связаны с различными формами сопротивления. В данной статье утверждается, что существует не только западная или незападная формы государственной власти, но и соответствующие им западная и незападная формы политического сопротивления. Методологически статья основывается на семантико-прагматическом подходе к формированию концепций. В данной статье уточняется концепция «незападного политического сопротивления». Сначала семантика этого понятия определяется через обзор релевантной научной литературы, а именно работ М. Фуко, М. Манна, И. Нойманна и Ю. Хабермаса, а затем с помощью кейс-стади Зомии как незападной формы сопротивления. В результате проведенного концептуального исследования можно следить следующие выводы. Западные формы государственной власти основаны на правительственности или инфраструктурной власти. Такие методы управления порождают соответствующие им западные стратегии политического сопротивления, основанные на делибиративной форме демократии как наиболее близкой к демократии, основанной на коммуникативной рациональности. Под незападными формами государственной власти понимаются практики управления, основанные на дисциплинарной или деспотической власти. Они порождают соответствующие им формы незападного сопротивления, включающие в себя либо стремление физически удалиться от государственного контроля в географически труднодоступные районы (Зомия), либо протестное сопротивление вплоть до по- встанческих войн и терроризма.

Various forms of state power are associated with various forms of resistance. This article argues that there is not only a Western or non-Western form of state power, but also the corresponding Western and non-Western forms of political resistance. Methodologically, the article is based on a semantic-pragmatic approach to the formation of concepts. This article clarifi es the concept of “non-Western political resistance.” First, the semantics of this concept is determined through a review of relevant scientifi c literature, namely the works of M. Foucault, M. Mann, I. Neumann and J. Habermas, and then using it studies Zomia as a case of a non-Western form of resistance. As a result of the conceptual study, the following conclusions can be made. Western forms of state power are based on governmentality or infrastructural power. Such governance methods give rise to their corresponding Western strategies of political resistance, based on the deliberative form of democracy as the closest to democracy based on communicative rationality. Non-Western forms of state power are understood as governance practices based on disciplinary or despotic power. They give rise to forms of non-Western resistance corresponding to them, which include either the desire to physically move away from state control in geographically inaccessible areas (the case of Zomia), or protest resistance up to civil wars and terrorism.

правительственностьинфраструктурная властьдисциплинарная властьЮго-Восточная АзияРоссияЗападнезападgovernmentalityinfrastructural authoritydisciplinary authoritySoutheast AsiaRussiathe Westnon-WestReferencesАрендт Х. Что такое авторитет? // Между прошлым и будущим. Восемь упражнений в политической мыс- ли. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара, 2014.Agamben, G. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press, 1998.Каспэ С.И. Центры и иерархии. Пространственные метафоры власти и западная политическая форма. М.: Московская школа политических исследований, 2008.Arendt, H. Chto takoye avtoritet? (What Is Authority?) / Between Past and Future. Eight Exercises in Political Thought. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2014.Обичкина Е.О. Cоциально-политический кризис во Франции: «жёлтые жилеты» и завершение «первой фазы» правления Э. Макрона // Вестник МГИМО- Университета. 2019. № 2(65). С. 101-135.Bevir, M.; Kedar, A. Concept Formation in Political Science: an Anti-Naturalist Critique of Qualitative Methodology // Perspectives on Politics, 2008, No.6, рр. 503-517.Фуко М. Рождение биополитики. Наука, 2010. Хардт М., Негри А. Империя. М.: Праксис, 2004. 440 с.Börzel, T.A.; Risse, Th.; Draude, A. The Oxford Handbook of Governance and Limited Statehood. Oxford University Press, 2018.Agamben, G. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press, 1998.Castells, M. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Bevir, M.; Kedar, A. Concept Formation in Political Science: an Anti-Naturalist Critique of Qualitative Methodology // Perspectives on Politics, 2008, No.6, рр. 503-517.Eisenstadt, Sh. Multiple Modernities // Daedalus, 2000, No.129.1, рр. 1-29.Börzel, T.A.; Risse, Th.; Draude, A. The Oxford Handbook of Governance and Limited Statehood. Oxford University Press, 2018.Foucault, M. Rozhdeniye biopolitiki (Birth of Biopolitics). Moscow: Science Publ., 2010.Castells, M. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Fukuyama F. Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.Eisenstadt, Sh. Multiple Modernities // Daedalus, 2000, No.129.1, рр. 1-29.Gerring, J. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Fukuyama F. Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.Gill, S. European governance and new constitutionalism: Economic and monetary union and alternatives to disciplinary neoliberalism in Europe // New Political Economy. 1998. No. 3(1). P. 5-26. doi:10.1080/13563469808406330Gerring, J. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Gill, S. Globalisation, market civilisation, and disciplinary neoliberalism / Millennium – Journal of International Studies. 1995. No. 24(3). P. 399-423. doi:10.1177/03058298950240030801Gill, S. European governance and new constitutionalism: Economic and monetary union and alternatives to disciplinary neoliberalism in Europe // New Political Economy. 1998. No. 3(1). P. 5-26. doi:10.1080/13563469808406330Gill, S. Transnational class formations, European crisis and the silent revolution // Critical Sociology. 2017. No. 43(4-5). P. 635-651. doi:10.1177/0896920516656920Gill, S. Globalisation, market civilisation, and disciplinary neoliberalism // Millennium – Journal of International Studies. 1995. No. 24(3). P. 399-423. doi:10.1177/03058298950240030801Goertz, G. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Gill, S. Transnational class formations, European crisis and the silent revolution // Critical Sociology. 2017. No. 43(4-5). P. 635-651. doi:10.1177/0896920516656920Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Goertz, G. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and Systems, a Critique of Functionalist Reason. Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Hardt, M.; Negri, A. Imperiya (Empire). Moscow: Praxis, 2004. 440 p.Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and Systems, a Critique of Functionalist Reason. Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Kaspe, S.I. Tsentry i iyerarkhii. Prostranstvennyye metafory vlasti i zapadnaya politicheskaya forma (Centers and Hierarchies. Spatial Metaphors of Power and the Western Political Form). Moscow: Moscow School of Political Studies, 2008.Mann, M. The Sources of Social Power: the Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760-1914. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Mann, M. The Sources of Social Power: the Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760-1914. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Michaud, J. Zomia and beyond // Journal of Global History, 2010, No. 5.2, рр. 187-214.Michaud, J. Zomia and beyond // Journal of Global History, 2010, No. 5.2, рр. 187-214.Neumann, I.B. Russia as a Great Power, 1815-2007 // Journal of International Relations and Development, 2008, No. 2, рр. 128-151.Neumann, I.B. Russia as a Great Power, 1815-2007 // Journal of International Relations and Development, 2008, No. 2, рр. 128-151.Neumann, I.B.; Sending, O.J. Governing the Global Polity: Practice, Mentality, Rationality. University of Michigan Press, 2010.Neumann, I.B.; Sending, O.J. Governing the Global Polity: Practice, Mentality, Rationality. University of Michigan Press, 2010.Neumann, I.B.; Wigen, E. The Steppe Tradition in International Relations: Russians, Turks and European State Building 4000 BCE–2017 CE. Cambridge University Press, 2018.Neumann, I.B.; Wigen, E. The Steppe Tradition in International Relations: Russians, Turks and European State Building 4000 BCE–2017 CE. Cambridge University Press, 2018.Risse, Th. Governance without a State?: Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. Columbia University Press, 2011.Obichkina, E.O. Cotsial’no-politicheskiy krizis vo Frantsii: «zholtyye zhilety» i zaversheniye «pervoy fazy» pravleniya E. Makrona (Socio-Political Crisis in France: “Yellow Vests” and the Completion of the “First Phase” of the Reign of E. Macron) // MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2019, No. 2 (65), рр. 101-135.Scott, J.C. Against the Grain: a Deep History of the Earliest States. Yale University Press, 2017.Risse, Th. Governance without a State?: Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. Columbia University Press, 2011.Scott, J.C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. Yale university press, 1990.Scott, J.C. Against the Grain: a Deep History of the Earliest States. Yale University Press, 2017.Scott, J.C. The Art of not being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Nus Press, 2010.Scott, J.C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. Yale university press, 1990.Stiglitz, J.E. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. WW Norton & Company, 2012.Scott, J.C. The Art of not being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Nus Press, 2010.Van Schendel, W. Geographies of Knowing, Geographies of Ignorance: Jumping Scale in Southeast Asia // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2002, No. 20.6, рр. 647-668.Stiglitz, J.E. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. WW Norton & Company, 2012.Van Schendel, W. Geographies of Knowing, Geographies of Ignorance: Jumping Scale in Southeast Asia // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2002, No. 20.6, рр. 647-668.Van Schendel, W. Geographies of Knowing, Geographies of Ignorance: Jumping Scale in Southeast Asia // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2002, No. 20.6, рр. 647-668.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.