comparativepoliticsСравнительная политикаComparative Politics Russia2221-32792412-4990Издательская группа «Юрист»10.24411/2221-3279-2019-10043comparativepolitics-1068Research ArticleСРАВНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА И ГЕОПОЛИТИКАCOMPARATIVE POLITICS AND GEOPOLITICSСРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИХ РЕЖИМОВ КНР И КИТАЙСКОЙ РЕСПУБЛИКИ НА ОСТРОВЕ ТАЙВАНЬCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL REGIMES IN PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (PRC) AND REPUBLIC OF CHINA (ROC)БореевА. П.BoreevA. P.

студент магистратуры «GR и международный лоббизм»

Москва

MA student “GR and International Lobbying”

Moscow

arseny.boreev@gmail.comМосковский государственный институт международных отношений (Университет) МИД РоссииРоссияMGIMO UniversityRussian Federation201918122019104Специальный номер "Незападные трансформации"7796Copyright © Бореев А.П., 20192019Бореев А.П.Boreev A.P.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/1068

Статья посвящена сравнительному анализу политических режимов в КНР и Китайской Республике на острове Тайвань, в частности особенностям режимных изменений на острове и материке в рамках третьей волны демократизации. В ходе исследования был дан ответ на вопрос, почему КНР после событий на площади Тяньаньмэнь не перешла к демократии. В результате были выявлены некоторые особенности процесса политической трансформации незападного типа по обе стороны Тайваньского пролива, а также установлено, что конфуцианская политическая культура не ведет ни к демократии, ни к авторитаризму, определяя только институциональный дизайн двух политических режимов.

The article focuses on the comparative analysis of political regimes and regime change within the “third wave” of democratization in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC, Taiwan). The study sheds some light on the failure of democratic transition in China’s after the Tiananmen Square protests. In the course of the study, the key features of non-Western political transformation across the Taiwan Strait were identifi ed. As a result, it was found that Confucian political culture leads to neither democracy, nor authoritarian rule, it merely determines institutional design of the political regimes..

сравнительный анализполитические режимыполитическая трансформация незападного типаКитайКНРТайваньпроблема двух Китаевдемократизациядемократический транзитcomparative analysispolitical regimesChinaPRCTaiwancross-strait relationsdemocratizationdemocratic transitionReferencesсъезд КПК: внешние и внутренние последствия и перспективы реформ в Китае (материалы круглого стола) // Сравнительная политика. 2018. № 2.s”yezd KPK: vneshniye i vnutrenniye posledstviya i perspektivy reform v Kitaye (materialy kruglogo stola) (19th Congress of the CPC: External and Internal Consequences and Prospects of Reforms in China (materials of the roundtable)) // Comparative Politics Russia, 2018, No. 2.Алмонд, Г., Верба С. Гражданская культура: политические установки и демократия в пяти странах / пер. с англ. Е. Генделя. М.: Мысль, 2014. 500 с.Allen, T. Cheng. The United States of China: How Business Is Moving Taipei and Beijing together // Asiaweek, July 6, 2001. Mode of access: http://qps.ru/9LTtwБуров В.Г. Модернизация тайваньского общества. М., 1998. 234 с.Almond, G.; Verba S. Grazhdanskaya kul’tura: politicheskiye ustanovki i demokratiya v pyati stranakh (Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Countries) / per. s angl. Ye. Gendelya. Moscow: Mysl’, 2014. 500 p.Виноградов А.В. XIX съезд КПК: великий поход к возрождению // Проблемы Дальнего Востока. 2018. № 1. С. 68-80.Bahro, Horst. Duverger’s Concept: Semi-presidential Government Revisited // European Journal of Political Research, 1998, No. 34, pp. 201-224.Виноградов А.В. Новый авторитаризм в Китае // Социально-политическая ситуация накануне XIX съезда КПК. Материалы ежегодной научной конференции Центра политический исследований и прогнозов ИДВ РАН, 2017. С. 70-79.Bell, Daniel A. Chinese Democracy Isn’t Inevitable. Can a Political System Be Democratically Legitimate without Being Democratic? // The Atlantic, May 29, 2015. Mode of access: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/05/chinese-democracy-isntinevitable/394325/Воскресенский А.Д. Общие закономерности, региональная специфика и концепция незападной демократии // Демократия в российском зеркале: монография / редакторы-составители A.M. Мигранян, А. Пшеворский. М.: МГИМО-Университет, 2013. C. 289-343.Burov, V.G. Modernizatsiya tayvan’skogo obshchestva (Modernization of Taiwanese Society). Moscow, 1998. 234 p.Воскресенский А.Д. Политические институты материкового и островного Китая // Сравнительная политология / Под. ред. О.В. Гаман-Голутвиной. М.: «Аспект Пресс», 2015. С. 625-653.Cheng, Li. Intra-Party Democracy in China: Should We Take It Seriously? / The Brookings Institution, Fall, 2009. Mode of access: http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2009/11/fall-china-democracy-liВоскресенский А.Д. Эволюция политической системы и политическая модернизация КНР: Проблемы и преимущества «китайской модели» // Модернизация и демократизация в странах БРИКС: Сравнительный анализ / Под ред. И.М. Бусыгиной, И.Ю. Окунева. М.: Издательство «Аспект Пресс», 2015. С. 27-53.China. World Development Indicators (WDI 2014), 18.04.2016. Mode of access: http://data.worldbank.org/country/chinaВоскресенский А.Д. Эволюция политической системы и политическая модернизация КНР: проблемы и преимущества «китайской модели» // Сравнительная политика. 2014. № 1. С. 120-138.Cultural Map – World Values Survey Wave 6 (2010- 2014) / WorldValuesSurvey. Mode of access: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jspГаленович Ю.М. Цзян Чжунчжэн, или неизвестный Чан Кайши. М.: Муравей, 2000. 360 с.Diamond, Larry. How Democratic Is Taiwan? Five Key Challenges for Democratic Development and Consolidation / Paper for the Symposium on “The Transition from One-Party Rule: Taiwan’s New Government and Cross-Straits Relations”, Columbia University, April 6-7, 2001. 20 p.Галенович Ю.М. Чжао Цзыян и реформы в Китае. М.: «СПСЛ»; «Русская панорама», 2012. 752 с.Doh, Chull Shin. Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 376 p.Гаман-Голутвина О.В. Элитообразование и внутренние расколы относительно характера, направлений и скорости модернизации // Модернизация и демократизация в странах БРИКС: Сравнительный анализ / Под. ред. И.М. Бусыгиной и И.Ю. Окунева. М.: Издательство «Аспект Пресс», 2015. C. 106-158.Election Types. Taiwan Central Election Commission, 18.04.2016. Mode of access: http://engweb.cec.gov.tw/fi les/11-1030-3859.phpИшутина Ю.А., Поповичева Ю.Н. Эволюция официального национализма на Тайване // «Россия и АТР». 2007. № 3. С. 110-117.Elgie, Robert. Semi-Presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations // Political Studies Review, 2004, Vol. 2, pp. 314-330.Корсун В.А. Идентичность «с китайской спецификой» // Полис. Политические исследования. 2008. № 3. С. 68-79.Fish, S.; Brooks, R.S. Does Diversity Hurt Democracy? // Journal of Democracy, 2012, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 154-166.Корсун В.А. Поиски и находки в решении проблем этнического сепаратизма Китая // Этносы и конфессии на Востоке: конфликты и взаимодействие. М.: МГИМО- Университет, 2005. С. 494-529.Fukuyama, F. Confucianism and Democracy // Journal of Democracy, 1995, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 22-33.Корсун В.А. Правящая элита современного Китая: тенденции модернизации и архаизации // Элиты стран Востока / под. ред. А.Ю. Другова, Н.П. Малетина, О.В. Новаковой. М.: ИД «Ключ-С», 2011.Galenovich, Yu.M. Chzhao TSzyyan i reformy v Kitaye (Zhao Ziyang and Reforms in China). Moscow: «SPSL»; «Russkaya panorama», 2012. 752 p.Мельвиль А.Ю. Опыт теоретико-методологического синтеза структурного и процедурного подходов к демократическим транзитам // Полис. Политические исследования. 1998. № 2.Galenovich, Yu.M. TSzyan Chzhunchzhen, ili neizvestnyy Chan Kayshi (Jiang Zhongzheng, or the Unknown Chiang Kai-shek). Moscow: Muravey, 2000. 360 p.Переломов Л.С. Конфуцианство и современный стратегический курс КНР. М.: ЛКИ, 2007. 256 с.Gaman-Golutvina, O.V. Elitoobrazovaniye i vnutrenniye raskoly otnositel’no kharaktera, napravleniy i skorosti modernizatsii (Elite Formation and Internal Schisms Regarding the Nature, Directions and Speed of Modernization) // Modernizatsiya i demokratizatsiya v stranakh BRIKS: Sravnitel’nyy analiz (Modernization and Democratization in the BRICS Countries: A Comparative Analysis) / Ed.by I.M. Busygina. I.Yu. Okunev. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo «Aspekt Press», 2015. Pp. 106-158.Переломов Л.С. Конфуций и конфуцианство с древности по настоящее время (V в. до н.э. – XXI в.). М.: Стилсервис, 2009. 706 с.Gilley, Bruce. China’s Democratic Future: How It Will Happen and Where It Will Lead Bruce Gilley. New York, Columbia University Press, 2004. 320 p.Переломов Л.С. Конфуций: Луньюй. М.: Восточная литература, 2001. 588 с.Göbel, Christian. Towards a Consolidated Democracy? Informal and Formal Institutions in Taiwan’s Political Process / Paper prepared for the Conference Group on Taiwan Studies at the APSA Meeting 2001. San Francisco, August 30th – September 2nd 24 p.Пшеворский А. Переходы к демократии // Путь. 1993. № 3.Halbeisen, Hermann. Taiwan’s Domestic Politics since the Presidential Elections 2000 // Duisburg Working Papers on East Asian Studies, 2003, No. 53, 22 p.Растоу Д.А. Переходы к демократии: попытка динамической модели // Полис. Политические исследования. 1996. № 5. С. 5-15.Hung-Mao, Tien. Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave. An East Gate Book, 1996. 272 p.Сартори Дж. Искажение концептов в сравнительной политологии // Полис. Политические исследования. 2003. № 5. С. 65-75.Huntington, S. The Clash of Civilization and the Remarking of World Order. N.Y.: Simon & Schuster, 2007. 368 p.Сергеев В.М. Демократия как переговорный процесс. М.: «Фазис», 1999. 146 с.Huntington, S. Tret’ya volna. Demokratizatsiya v kontse XX veka (Third Wave. Democratization at the End of the 20th Century) / Moscow: «Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya» (ROSSPEN), 2003. 368 p.Смирнов Д.А. Особенности эволюции института главы государства в материковом Китае и на Тайване // Общество и государство в Китае. Т. XLVII, Ч. 1. Институт востоковедения РАН. Москва, 2017. С. 490-498.Huntington, Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1968. 263 p.Сунь Ятсен. Избранные произведения. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Главная редакция восточной литературы, издательство «Наука», 1985. 759 с.Inglehart, Ronald; Baker, Wayne E. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values // American Sociological Review, 2000, Vol. 65, No. 1, Looking Forward, Looking Back: Continuity and Change at the Turn of the Millenium, pp. 19-51.Хантингтон С. Третья волна. Демократизация в конце XX века / Пер. с англ. М.: «Российская политическая энциклопедия» (РОССПЭН), 2003. 368 с.Ishutina, Yu.A.; Popovicheva, Yu.N. Evolyutsiya ofi tsial’nogo natsionalizma na Tayvane (The Evolution of Offi cial Nationalism in Taiwan) // «Rossiya i ATR», 2007, No. 3, pp. 110-117.Харитонова О.Г. Траектории режимных изменений и пределы демократизации // Модернизация и демократизация в странах БРИКС: Сравнительный анализ / Под. ред. И.М. Бусыгиной и И.Ю. Окунева. М.: Издательство «Аспект Пресс», 2015. С. 158-212.Kharitonova, O.G. Trayektorii rezhimnykh izmeneniy i predely demokratizatsii (The Trajectories of Regime Changes and the Limits of Democratization) // Modernizatsiya i demokratizatsiya v stranakh BRIKS: Sravnitel’nyy analiz (Modernization and Democratization in the BRICS Countries: A Comparative Analysis) / Ed. by I.M. Busygina, I.Yu. Okunev. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo «Aspekt Press», 2015. Pp. 158-212.Allen, T. Cheng. The United States of China: How Business Is Moving Taipei and Beijing together // Asiaweek, July 6, 2001. Mode of access: http://qps.ru/9LTtwKorsun, V.A. Identichnost’ «s kitayskoy spetsifi koy» (Identity “with Chinese Characteristics”) // Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya, 2008, No. 3, pp. 68-79.Bahro, Horst. Duverger’s Concept: Semi-presidential Government Revisited // European Journal of Political Research, 1998, No. 34, pp. 201-224.Korsun, V.A. Poiski i nakhodki v reshenii problem etnicheskogo separatizma Kitaya (Searches and Finds in Solving the Problems of Ethnic Separatism in China) // Etnosy i konfessii na Vostoke: konfl ikty i vzaimodeystviye (Ethnic Groups and Faiths in the East: Confl icts and Interaction). Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 2005. Pp. 494-529.Bell, Daniel A. Chinese Democracy Isn’t Inevitable. Can a Political System Be Democratically Legitimate without Being Democratic? // The Atlantic, May 29, 2015. Mode of access: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/05/chinese-democracy-isntinevitable/394325/Korsun, V.A. Pravyashchaya elita sovremennogo Kitaya: tendentsii modernizatsii i arkhaizatsii (The Ruling Elite of Modern China: Trends of Modernization and Archaization) // Elity stran Vostoka (Elites of the East) / Ed. by A.Yu. Drugov, N.P. Maletin, O.V. Novakova. Moscow: ID «Klyuch-S», 2011.Cheng, Li. Intra-Party Democracy in China: Should We Take It Seriously? / The Brookings Institution, Fall, 2009. Mode of access: http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2009/11/fall-china-democracy-liLaakso, M.; Taagepera, R. Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe // Comparative Political Studies, 1979, No. 1, pp. 3-27.Diamond, Larry. How Democratic Is Taiwan? Five Key Challenges for Democratic Development and Consolidation / Paper for the Symposium on “The Transition from One- Party Rule: Taiwan’s New Government and Cross-Straits Relations”, Columbia University, April 6-7, 2001. 20 p.Levy, Richard. Village Elections in China – Democracy or Façade? / New Politics, Electoral Politics, Winter 2010, Vol. XII-4, No. 48. Mode of access: http://newpol.org/content/village-elections-china-democracy-orfa%C3%A7adeDoh, Chull Shin. Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 376 p.Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999. 351 p.Election Types. Taiwan Central Election Commission, 18.04.2016. Mode of access: http://engweb.cec.gov.tw/files/11-1030-3859.phpLink, Perry. What It Means to be Chinese: Nationalism and Identity in Xi’s China // Foreign Affairs, 2015, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 25-31.Elgie, Robert. Semi-Presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations // Political Studies Review, 2004, Vol. 2, pp. 314-330.Linz, J.; Stepan, A. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 504 p.Fish, S.; Brooks, R.S. Does Diversity Hurt Democracy? // Journal of Democracy, 2012, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 154-166.Linz, Juan J.; Stepan, Alfred C. Toward Consolidated Democracies // Journal of Democracy, 1996, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 14-33.Fukuyama, F. Confucianism and Democracy // Journal of Democracy, 1995, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 22-33.Magaloni, B.; Kricheli, R. Political Order and One- Party Rule // Annual Review of Political Science, 2010, No. 13, pp. 123-143.Gilley, Bruce. China’s Democratic Future: How It Will Happen and Where It Will Lead Bruce Gilley. New York, Columbia University Press, 2004. 320 p.Mel’vil’, A.Yu. Opyt teoretiko-metodologicheskogo sinteza strukturnogo i protsedurnogo podkhodov k demokraticheskim tranzitam (The Experience of Theoretical and Methodological Synthesis of Structural and Procedural Approaches to Democratic Transit) // Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya, 1998, No. 2.Göbel, Christian. Towards a Consolidated Democracy? Informal and Formal Institutions in Taiwan’s Political Process / Paper prepared for the Conference Group on Taiwan Studies at the APSA Meeting 2001. San Francisco, August 30th – September 2nd 24 p.Meseznikov, G. Democratization and Civil Society Development in Taiwan: Some Lessons for Central Europe. Institute for Public Affairs, Bratislava. Pp. 29-53.Halbeisen, Hermann. Taiwan’s Domestic Politics since the Presidential Elections 2000 // Duisburg Working Papers on East Asian Studies, 2003, No. 53, 22 p.O’Donnell, Guillermo; Schmitter, Philippe C. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 1986. 99 p.Hung-Mao, Tien. Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave. An East Gate Book, 1996. 272 p.Ondrej, Kucera. Is Taiwan a Presidential System? // China Perspectives, 2006, No. 66 – July-August, 14 p.Huntington, S. The Clash of Civilization and the Remarking of World Order. N.Y.: Simon & Schuster, 2007. 368 p.Perelomov, L.S. Konfutsianstvo i sovremennyy strategicheskiy kurs KNR (Confucianism and the Modern Strategic Course of the PRC). Moscow: LKI, 2007. 256 p.Huntington, Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1968. 263 p.Perelomov, L.S. Konfutsiy i konfutsianstvo s drevnosti po nastoyashcheye vremya (V v. do n.e. – XXI v.) (Confucius and Confucianism from Antiquity to the Present (V Century BC ‒ XXI Century)). Moscow: Stilservis, 2009. 706 p.Inglehart, Ronald; Baker, Wayne E. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values // American Sociological Review, 2000, Vol. 65,Perelomov, L.S. Konfutsiy: Lun’ yuy (Confucius: Lun Yu). Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura, 2001. 588 p.No. 1, Looking Forward, Looking Back: Continuity and Change at the Turn of the Millenium, pp. 19-51.Pshevorsky, A. Perekhody k demokratii (Transitions to Democracy) // Put’, 1993, No. 3.Laakso, M.; Taagepera, R. Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe // Comparative Political Studies, 1979, No. 1, pp. 3-27.Quermonne, J.L. Les regimes Politiques Occidentaux. Paris: Ed. Du Seuil, 1986. 337 p.Levy, Richard. Village Elections in China – Democracy or Façade? / New Politics, Electoral Politics, Winter 2010, Vol. XII-4, No. 48. Mode of access: http://newpol.org/content/village-elections-china-democracy-orfa%C3%A7adeRigger, Shalley. Democratic Transition and Consolidation in Taiwan // Future in the Asian Century: Toward a Strong, Prosperous and Enduring Democracy Conference. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC. November 10, 2011. 17 p.Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999. 351 p.Rostow, D.A. Perekhody k demokratii: popytka dinamicheskoy modeli (Transitions to Democracy: an Attempt at a Dynamic Model) // Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya, 1996, No. 5, pp. 5-15.Link, Perry. What It Means to be Chinese: Nationalism and Identity in Xi’s China // Foreign Affairs, 2015, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 25-31.Salvatore, Babones. Country Lessons: a Rural Incubator for China’s Political Reform? // Foreign Affairs, October 14, 2015. Mode of access: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2015-10-14/country-lessonsLinz, J.; Stepan, A. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 504 p.Sartori, Dzh. Iskazheniye kontseptov v sravnitel’noy politologii (The Distortion of Concepts in Comparative Political Science) // Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya, 2003, No. 5, pp. 65-75.Linz, Juan J.; Stepan, Alfred C. Toward Consolidated Democracies // Journal of Democracy, 1996, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 14-33.Sergeev, V.M. Demokratiya kak peregovornyy protsess (Democracy as a Negotiation Process). Moscow: «Fazis», 1999. 146 p.Magaloni, B.; Kricheli, R. Political Order and One- Party Rule // Annual Review of Political Science, 2010, No. 13, pp. 123-143.Shugart, Matthew Soberg; Carey, John M. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1992. 332 p.Meseznikov, G. Democratization and Civil Society Development in Taiwan: Some Lessons for Central Europe. Institute for Public Affairs, Bratislava. Pp. 29-53.Smirnov, D.A. Osobennosti evolyutsii instituta glavy gosudarstva v materikovom Kitaye i na Tayvane (Features of the Evolution of the Institution of the Head of State in Mainland China and Taiwan) // Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitaye (Society and State in China). Vol. XLVII, Ch. 1. Institut vostokovedeniya RAN. Moskow, 2017. Pp. 490-498.O’Donnell, Guillermo; Schmitter, Philippe C. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 1986. 99 p.Stepan, A.; Linz, J.; Yadav, Y. Crafting State-Nations. India and Other Multinational Democracies. The John Hopkins University Press, 2010. 336 p.Ondrej, Kucera. Is Taiwan a Presidential System? // China Perspectives, 2006, No. 66 – July-August, 14 p.Sun’, Yatsen. Izbrannyye proizvedeniya (Sun Yat-sen. Selected Works). Moscow: Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury, izdatel’stvo «Nauka», 1985. 759 p.Quermonne, J.L. Les regimes Politiques Occidentaux. Paris: Ed. Du Seuil, 1986. 337 p.Thompson, M.R. Totalitarian and Post-Totalitarian Regimes in Transition and Non-Transitions from Communism // Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 2002, No. 1, pp. 79-106.Rigger, Shalley. Democratic Transition and Consolidation in Taiwan // Future in the Asian Century: Toward a Strong, Prosperous and Enduring Democracy Conference. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC. November 10, 2011. 17 p.Vanhanen, T. Prospects of Democracy. A Study of 172 Countries. L.; N. Y.: Routledge, 1997. 392 p.Salvatore, Babones. Country Lessons: a Rural Incubator for China’s Political Reform? // Foreign Affairs, October 14, 2015. Mode of access: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2015-10-14/country-lessonsVinogradov, A.V. Novyy avtoritarizm v Kitaye (New Authoritarianism in China) // Sotsial’no-politicheskaya situatsiya nakanune XIX s”yezda KPK. (Socio-political Situation on the Eve of the 19th CPC Congress) Materialy yezhegodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii Tsentra politicheskiy issledovaniy i prognozov IDV RAN, 2017. Pp. 70-79.Shugart, Matthew Soberg; Carey, John M. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1992. 332 p.Vinogradov, A.V. XIX s”yezd KPK: velikiy pokhod k vozrozhdeniyu (IX Congress of the CPC: the Great Campaign for Revival) // Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka, 2018, No. 1, pp. 68-80.Stepan, A.; Linz, J.; Yadav, Y. Crafting State-Nations. India and Other Multinational Democracies. The John Hopkins University Press, 2010. 336 p.Voskressenski, A.D. Evolyutsiya politicheskoy sistemy i politicheskaya modernizatsiya KNR: Problemy i preimushchestva «kitayskoy modeli» (The Evolution of the Political System and Political Modernization of the PRC: Problems and Advantages of the “Chinese Model”) // Modernizatsiya i demokratizatsiya v stranakh BRIKS Sravnitel’nyy analiz (Modernization and Democratization in the BRICS Countries: A Comparative Analysis) / Ed. by I.M. Busygina, I.Yu. Okunev. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo «Aspekt Press», 2015. Pp. 27-53.Thompson, M.R. Totalitarian and Post-Totalitarian Regimes in Transition and Non-Transitions from Communism // Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 2002, No. 1, pp. 79-106.Voskressenski, A.D. Evolyutsiya politicheskoy sistemy i politicheskaya modernizatsiya KNR: problemy i preimushchestva «kitayskoy modeli» (The Evolution of the Political System and Political Modernization of the PRC: Problems and Advantages of the “Chinese Model”) // Comparative Politics Russia, 2014, No. 1, pp. 120-138.Vanhanen, T. Prospects of Democracy. A Study of 172 Countries. L.; N. Y.: Routledge, 1997. 392 p.Voskressenski, A.D. Obshchiye zakonomernosti, regional’naya spetsifi ka i kontseptsiya nezapadnoy demokratii (General Laws, Regional Specifi cs and the Concept of non-Western Democracy) // Demokratiya v rossiyskom zerkale: monografi ya / Ed,. by A.M. Migranyan, A. Przeworski. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 2013. Pp. 289-343.Weingast, Barry R.; Qian, Yingyi; Montinola, Gabriella. Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China // World Politics, 1995, Vol. 48, No.1, pp. 50-81.Voskressenski, A.D. Politicheskiye instituty materikovogo i ostrovnogo Kitaya (Political Institutions of Mainland and Island China) // Sravnitel’naya politologiya (Comparative Political Science) / Ed. by O.V. Gaman- Golutvina. Moscow: «Aspekt Press», 2015. Pp. 625-653.Wu, Yu-Shan. Appointing the Prime Minister under Incongruence: Taiwan in Comparison with France and Russia // Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2005, Vol. 1, No. 1,pp. 103-132.Weingast, Barry R.; Qian, Yingyi; Montinola, Gabriella. Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China // World Politics, 1995, Vol. 48, No.1, pp. 50-81.Wu, Yu-Shan. Appointing the Prime Minister under Incongruence: Taiwan in Comparison with France and Russia // Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2005, Vol. 1, No. 1,pp. 103-132.Wu, Yu-Shan. Appointing the Prime Minister under Incongruence: Taiwan in Comparison with France and Russia // Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2005, Vol. 1, No. 1,pp. 103-132.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.